Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Somewhere earlier I stated that the Orthodox would probably agree more with the Molinist understanding of everything, but would tell the theologians and scholars to stop attempting to scholastize everything and understand this great mystery logically. Yes, Orthodoxy definitely does not agree with the Calvinist developments concerning election and foreknowledge, that much is certain.countrymousenc said:I just looked up Molinism in the Catholic Encyclopedia, which contrasts it with Thomism. It seems that Molinism comes at the question from freedom of will, whereas Thomism approaches from efficacious grace.
My best guess, based on what little I know, is that the Orthodox view would be something like "Stop trying to reduce great mysteries to simple logic!" Far as I can tell, Orthodoxy does not deny election, yet does not agree with the Calvinist development of it.
Is that anywhere close?
but would tell the theologians and scholars to stop attempting to scholastize everything and understand this great mystery logically
Shelb5 said:Patristic,
May I ask a question?
What is your interest in comparing Catholic theory to Orthodox in this area? Are you trying to settle on a theory that you can feel comfortable with? I would assume you have already rejected Reformed views.
What exactly is the EO view on all this?
Patristic said:I have read several things that have said that Catholics and Orthodox have much in common on these issues, and you yourself said the same. I am basically trying to compare and contrast the two Churches teachings on the subject. I don't think the Orthodox would agree with the Thomist's, so I am just assuming they would be more inclined to agree with the Molinist's.
I. THE LIFE OF MAN - TO KNOW AND LOVE GOD
1 God, infinitely perfect and blessed in himself, in a plan of sheer goodness freely created man to make him share in his own blessed life. For this reason, at every time and in every place, God draws close to man. He calls man to seek him, to know him, to love him with all his strength. He calls together all men, scattered and divided by sin, into the unity of his family, the Church. To accomplish this, when the fullness of time had come, God sent his Son as Redeemer and Savior. In his Son and through him, he invites men to become, in the Holy Spirit, his adopted children and thus heirs of his blessed life.
2 So that this call should resound throughout the world, Christ sent forth the apostles he had chosen, commissioning them to proclaim the gospel: "Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, to the close of the age."4 Strengthened by this mission, the apostles "went forth and preached everywhere, while the Lord worked with them and confirmed the message by the signs that attended it."5
3 Those who with God's help have welcomed Christ's call and freely responded to it are urged on by love of Christ to proclaim the Good News everywhere in the world. This treasure, received from the apostles, has been faithfully guarded by their successors. All Christ's faithful are called to hand it on from generation to generation, by professing the faith, by living it in fraternal sharing, and by celebrating it in liturgy and prayer.6
Patristic said:Is that quote from the CCC by any chance? I'm assuming that it is because of the format and content. The Orthodox Church doesn't have any specific teaching document like the Catechism to pinpoint exact dogmatic assertions. As far as I can tell, the Eastern Churches would most likely agree with that statement, but it is very vague. So when someone wants to approach the issue on a deeper level, I think that is when comparing and contrasting theoretical theological frameworks becomes beneficial.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?