• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Difference between a fact ,theory and a guess

Status
Not open for further replies.

Justatruthseeker

Newbie
Site Supporter
Jun 4, 2013
10,132
996
Tulsa, OK USA
✟177,504.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others
if its possible to get similar genes by convergent evolution its also possible to get identical genes by convergent evolution. so evolution has no problem to explain convergent at the genetic level too.
Throw it out. All engineers take what already works and then adapt it to similar but different uses. For some reason unexplainable they always want God to ignore a good design and reinvent the wheel for every creature.

But I noticed some of them arguing against convergent evolution when you asked why mammals could not develop feathers in the future.

Then suddenly convergent evolution became ridiculous.

Regardless that feathers have nothing to do with scales and reptiles....
 
Last edited:
Reactions: xianghua
Upvote 0

xianghua

Well-Known Member
Feb 14, 2017
5,215
555
44
tel aviv
✟119,055.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Single
But I noticed some of them arguing against convergent evolution when you asked why mammals could not develop feathers in the future.

Then suddenly convergent evolution became ridiculous.
yes. that is funny.
 
Upvote 0

xianghua

Well-Known Member
Feb 14, 2017
5,215
555
44
tel aviv
✟119,055.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Single

by the way human does have genes for feathers:

Your Inner Feather
 
Upvote 0

Justatruthseeker

Newbie
Site Supporter
Jun 4, 2013
10,132
996
Tulsa, OK USA
✟177,504.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others
yes. that is funny.
What’s even more funny is research now show feathers have nothing to do with reptilian scales. But that what they call scales are actually feather buds arrested early in development.

Not scales becoming feathers, but feathers becoming scales????
 
Upvote 0

Justatruthseeker

Newbie
Site Supporter
Jun 4, 2013
10,132
996
Tulsa, OK USA
✟177,504.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others
Upvote 0

VirOptimus

A nihilist who cares.
Aug 24, 2005
6,814
4,422
54
✟258,187.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Ha, facts are facts that are truly facts. Water boils at temperature of 211.9 °F. That's a fact that can't be considered otherwise. There's a whole world of "so called facts" which are only just that demonstrated later not to be so.

According to you, what is a fact?
 
Upvote 0

FrumiousBandersnatch

Well-Known Member
Mar 20, 2009
15,405
8,144
✟349,292.00
Faith
Atheist
False assumption. What direction they are moving is irrelevant, only that they move at the same approximate velocities.
Objects share a proper (co-moving) frame if they have the same velocity.

Direction is clearly relevant when dealing with velocities because velocity is a vector of speed and direction.

No. all I said was, "if A & B are in relative motion, A is moving at exactly the same speed relative to B as B is to A". The speed they are moving relative to some other observer is irrelevant. Consider the limit case where A and B share a proper frame; A is moving at 0 mph relative to B, and B is moving at 0 mph relative to A.

Sure he did, use your brain. If B must be transformed into the measurements of A, then the measurements are not the same....
Yet you can't provide any quote, link, or reference to his use of that phrase. The Lorentz transformations simply translate from one inertial frame to another, so you can see what an observer in another inertial frame will observe. Of course observers in different frames will make different measurements, that's SR.

No, just observers moving at the same approximate velocity. Hence all other observers not moving at your velocity have clocks of a different duration and rulers of a different length.
All observers in different inertial frames will make different observations. Only observers sharing a proper frame will make the same observations.

No such frame exists......
You'll have to explain what you mean - all frames are in relative motion.

You must adjust GPS clocks. No third observer is required. Their rate is not the same as yours. They neither measure the same time as you nor the same distance as you, because their velocity is not approximately equal to yours.
Approximate doesn't come into it; unless the velocities are exactly equal, i.e. they share a frame, observers will make different measurements.
 
Reactions: Astrophile
Upvote 0

DogmaHunter

Code Monkey
Jan 26, 2014
16,757
8,531
Antwerp
✟158,395.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
if its possible to get similar genes by convergent evolution its also possible to get identical genes by convergent evolution. so evolution has no problem to explain convergent at the genetic level too.

There are limits to what is reasonable here.

Replicating 300 million years worth of evolution to build something like feathers, is not just going to repeat itself in another species.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.