Voegelin

Reactionary
Aug 18, 2003
20,145
1,430
Connecticut
✟26,726.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
Walter Duranty.The New York Times, Friday March 31st 1933:
Letter from an woman in the northern Caucasus to her uncle in Germany. April 24, 1933:
Harold Denny, New York Times Oct 7, 1934:
Gareth Jones. The Sun (UK). March 29, 1933:
Eugene Lyons. 1937 : The Press Corps Conceals a Famine

A one time mistake by the New York Times? Forward ahead 40 years to the start of Pol Pot's reign of terror which killed nearly 2 million Cambodians.
 

Voegelin

Reactionary
Aug 18, 2003
20,145
1,430
Connecticut
✟26,726.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
SonWorshipper said:
Didn't I also read somewhere that it was the NYT that was denying the Holocaust as well? Who owns that paper, anyone know?

The Sulzberger family owns the voting stock. Arthur Sulzberger Jr. is the nominal publisher.

"Holocaust" is a neologism coined in the 1970s.

Arthur "Pinch" Sulzberger did, a few years back, claim the worst misinformation his family's paper put out was not reporting on the "Holocaust."

But that is not true. The paper did report on Jews under Nazi Germany. Yes, the term "holocaust" was not used because it had not been invented.

But the Times did hold back on the plight of Jews in Germany during WWII. There were reasons for this. Mainly that, with hundreds of thousands, millions of others being murdered, it would not be productive to concentrate on Jewish suffering. There was also the fear that, if the Times did harp on Jews, Nazis would make things even worse.

The fact is that the New York Times did try to alleviate the suffering of Jews during the war.

But the New York Times repressed the murder of over 7 million Christians over a decade earlier.
 
Upvote 0

Woodsy

Returned From Afar.
Site Supporter
Jun 24, 2003
3,698
271
Pacific NW
✟35,414.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Voegelin said:
But that is not true. The paper did report on Jews under Nazi Germany. Yes, the term "holocaust" was not used because it had not been invented.
Facts don't seem to get in your way when you have a chance to insult Jews or to imply some sort of conspiracy, Voegelin...

HOLOCAUST:

Word History: Totality of destruction has been central to the meaning of holocaust since it first appeared in Middle English in the 14th century, used in reference to the biblical sacrifice in which a male animal was wholly burnt on the altar in worship of God. Holocaust comes from Greek holokauston (“that which is completely burnt”), which was a translation of Hebrew ‘
(literally “that which goes up,” that is, in smoke).
In this sense of “burnt sacrifice,” holocaust is still used in some versions of the Bible. In the 17th century the meaning of holocaust broadened to “something totally consumed by fire,” and the word eventually was applied to fires of extreme destructiveness. In the 20th century holocaust has taken on a variety of figurative meanings, summarizing the effects of war, rioting, storms, epidemic diseases, and even economic failures. Most of these usages arose after World War II, but it is unclear whether they permitted or resulted from the use of holocaust in reference to the mass murder of European Jews and others by the Nazis. This application of the word occurred as early as 1942, but the phrase the Holocaust did not become established until the late 1950s.


From: http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=holocaust
 
Upvote 0