Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I think it is a faster spin that shortens days.
Another thought is the molten center wobbling creates its own driving force to increase the spin slightly.
Another suggestion is that a asteroid in a close fly by tugged on the waters of earth and created a force to speed the earth's spin.
Another thought is the molten center wobbling creates its own driving force to increase the spin slightly.
I'm going to take a different stance for a moment on the term in bold italics above. The most that someone has ever dug into the surface of the earth is 12.262 km, specifically the Kola Superdeep Borehole in the Pechengsky District in Russia.
When they reached the deeper depths, expecting to find molten substances, they only found superheated water (that superheating seeming to have been the result of intense pressure) and hydrogen gas (the latter being a by-product of the water, as the oxygen bonded with earth element). The core samples that were pulled gave evidence of deep sources of water, which serve as physical proof of the account of "the fountains of the deep" which burst forth in the account of Noach in B'resheet 7 and 8.
We've all seen the grade school images in science texts, showing the usual crust/mantle/outer core/inner core model, but there has not been direct, perceivable evidence to show that such a model holds true. Simply put, no one's ever dug down farther than 12.262 km, and, when looking at a world with a diametre of ~12,742 km, that comes up really short. So, how do they know what's down past 12.262 km? The school model sounds like an interesting hypothesis, but nothing's been observed to verify it.
I imagine that is a good thing, given what we read about what comes out of the deep in the Last Days (cf. Chazon (Revelation) 9).
I know, no proof of molten center, but what if, then, scenario was given.I'm going to take a different stance for a moment on the term in bold italics above. The most that someone has ever dug into the surface of the earth is 12.262 km, specifically the Kola Superdeep Borehole in the Pechengsky District in Russia.
When they reached the deeper depths, expecting to find molten substances, they only found superheated water (that superheating seeming to have been the result of intense pressure) and hydrogen gas (the latter being a by-product of the water, as the oxygen bonded with earth element). The core samples that were pulled gave evidence of deep sources of water, which serve as physical proof of the account of "the fountains of the deep" which burst forth in the account of Noach in B'resheet 7 and 8.
We've all seen the grade school images in science texts, showing the usual crust/mantle/outer core/inner core model, but there has not been direct, perceivable evidence to show that such a model holds true. Simply put, no one's ever dug down farther than 12.262 km, and, when looking at a world with a diametre of ~12,742 km, that comes up really short. So, how do they know what's down past 12.262 km? The school model sounds like an interesting hypothesis, but nothing's been observed to verify it.
I imagine that is a good thing, given what we read about what comes out of the deep in the Last Days (cf. Chazon (Revelation) 9).
I know, no proof of molten center, but what if, then, scenario was given.
It is not conclusive regarding the center of the earth.I don't follow. Could you restate?
It is not conclusive regarding the center of the earth.
I presented from the point of a molten center for how the earth can be slowed down in it rotation.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?