- Jan 10, 2010
- 37,281
- 8,501
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
How do we test it for accuracy.....against what?
How do we know the age of something to test it?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
A new dating method of ultrasensitive isotope trace analysis has been recently developed, Atom Trap Trace Analysis (ATTA), has captured the attention of the Earth Science community.
Try looking at the links I provided in post #1 and #3. They are all full access papers describing that very thing. And against what? Measuring sensitivity down to PPT and PPQ as well as comparison with other methods and samples of known age.How do we test it for accuracy.....against what?
Comparison with other dating methods and items of historically known age. Again, try sourcing the papers I linked.How do we know the age of something to test it?
Try looking at the links I provided in post #1 and #3. They are all full access papers describing that very thing. And against what? Measuring sensitivity down to PPT and PPQ as well as comparison with other methods and samples of known age.
Comparison with other dating methods and items of historically known age. Again, try sourcing the papers I linked.
Could be if you had a way to observe the future or past.This assumes that time is fixed. It is not.
Quantum principles acknowledge that the "future" or "present" can change the "past".
Some creationist arguments are unaffected by this new technique:
1. You can't prove the sample was always in a closed system.
2. You can't prove that radioactive decay rates haven't changed over time.
These are two of the more popular anti-isotope dating arguments, also, btw.
If you cannot read what I have already suggested for you to read, which answers those questions in detail, not to mention several posts where I have already commented on those very things. I don't care to play childish games with you.What things do we know the age of?
Your baby shoes....perhaps.
And how would we know the new method is better than the ones we think are inferior...
...which we are using to check the new one.
"Gödel’s incompleteness theorems - Proven in 1931 by Kurt Gödel, these theories say that with any given set of logical rules, except for the most simple, there will always be statements that are undecidable, meaning that they cannot be proven or disproven due to the inevitable self-referential nature of any logical systems that is even remotely complicated"
If you cannot read what I have already suggested for you to read, which answers those questions in detail, not to mention several posts where I have already commented on those very things. I don't care to play childish games with you.
I get that you don't understand what the articles say or am able to answer general questions about them.
Being critical of your own claim is a tough thing to do.
I think Rick probably understands these articles better than you do.
Papias
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?