Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Your misunderstanding is that you don't recognize that the fine tuning is a real phenomena just like atoms and quarks.
If Davies, Barnes, Tipler and many many others saw this they would think you very inept in understanding the problem.
Plays the victim card. Typical.
Since you can't present evidence demonstrating the existence of a fine tuner, why should I have to disprove a fine tuner?
What evidence did Davies, Barnes, and Tipler present for the existence of a fine tuner?
No fine tuner, no fine tuning.
I am going to correct that mockery is the only possible tool...so is a straw man argument.
Denial of a scientific term is no better.
No fine tuner, no fine tuning.
Multiple years of strengthening the defense mechanisms and this is what you get.
Back to square one.
Denial of a scientific term is no better.
I'm sorry, but you can break free of them if you try hard. I have hope for you yet.
When you have actual evidence for a fine tuner, let us know.
Twisting of a scientific term is the worst, which is exactly what you do.
Never made that claim. Straw man.The fine tuning argument does not posit that there is a fine tuner?
False. The term is a scientific term used by those in the field.
Never made that claim. Straw man.
Then the position you are arguing for isn't related to ID or anything theistic.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?