• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Cryogenics and the soul

nyj

Goodbye, my puppy
Feb 5, 2002
20,976
1,304
USA
Visit site
✟46,748.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Current cryogenic techniques are not adequate enough to freeze persons and realistically think that these people can be brought back to life sometime in the future. Most, if not all, of those cells will be damaged to the point of no return. Anyone, to this point, who has been cryogenically frozen (which always afaik has occured after death anyways) is dead and will remain dead.
 
Upvote 0

Phred

Junior Mint
Aug 12, 2003
5,373
998
✟22,717.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Fascinating question tho... if the body contains a soul and if that soul is required for life, then if there is even the slightest possibility of revival must that soul be bound to that body?

Scientifically... they're all dead. Too much damage to tissue. But it's a good question to ponder.
 
Upvote 0

signalerror

Active Member
Mar 22, 2004
43
2
✟173.00
Faith
Agnostic
Shekinahs said:
I would think if your heart is not beating you would be dead.

Ever heard of open heart operations? Many people have their hearts stopped for hours and yet can live. Mainly in part due to blood pumping devices.

Yet, many 3rd world contries will perform the same operation by chilling the body with packed ice to cause the heart to slow or stop then they will operate.

As for a person being cryo frozen... Their has been limited success with freezeing rodents for about a days period and then having a complete revival.

But then agian where is our soul stored and can we lose it when we are frozen? I dont know. But if I had to pick one, I would say the soul lives on.
 
Upvote 0

Mike Flynn

Well-Known Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,728
35
✟2,069.00
Faith
Christian
Phred said:
Fascinating question tho... if the body contains a soul and if that soul is required for life, then if there is even the slightest possibility of revival must that soul be bound to that body?
I suppose it would depend on how the soul is bound to the body. Some theology tells us that all biological systems are bound to a spiritual existence of some kind...and this linkage has something to do with the difference between a live cell and the inanimate pile of chemicals that make up that cell. IOW, the spiritual element, on some level, has something to do with the animation of living things.

When you think about it, evolution tells us that life itself is really the tale of a singular kind of existence...living cells with a common origin copying themselves and reproducing through history. If you look at history you can construct a kind of evolutionary 'tree of life' (and the bible uses a similar analogy for spiritual life: the tree of life in eden). The spiritual element is intrinsically linked to the biological element. Death represents the separation of these elements. IOW, spiritual existence makes (even a single cell) live.

What about a frozen cell? Well, we can certainly freeze single cells. And when they are thawed they live...and so they are still bound to a spiritual existence (according to some interpretations). Of course, no one can say how that spiritual exitence experiences time when the biological components are 'frozen'. Perhaps it does not experience time at all.

Phred said:
Scientifically... they're all dead. Too much damage to tissue. But it's a good question to ponder.
The trick is to avoid the formation of ice crystals, which are toxic to the cells. Using liquid nitrogen, we can get vitrification of the water (no crystals)...but the freezing has to be quite rapid...not possible for dense organ tissue.
 
Upvote 0

Bushido216

Well-Known Member
Aug 30, 2003
6,383
210
39
New York
✟30,062.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Engaged
Politics
US-Democrat
Roman Soldier said:
Are those who have been cryogenically frozen "dead" as far as the soul is concerned?
I guess if you were frozen while still alive your soul would still be in your body. You'd just be sleeping for a LOOOOOOOOONG time.
 
Upvote 0

Aggie

Soldier of Knowledge
Jan 18, 2004
1,903
204
41
United States
Visit site
✟25,497.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Libertarian
Mike Flynn said:
The trick is to avoid the formation of ice crystals, which are toxic to the cells. Using liquid nitrogen, we can get vitrification of the water (no crystals)...but the freezing has to be quite rapid...not possible for dense organ tissue.

I read an article on this a few weeks ago. Right now there is a way to freeze people fast enough to prevent ice crystals from forming--the problem is that nobody has yet invented a way to THAW people fast enough to allow them to recover. At the moment, there's a facility that has cryogenically frozen a few terminally ill people in hope that someone will one day invent a way to thaw them and cure them. Perhaps there never will be, but it's the only chance these people have of recovering from their illnesses.

Of course, if you think being cryogenically frozen traps your soul in your body, then it might be preferable to just go ahead and die rather than remaining frozen for some unspecified amount of time. But since I don't believe that our souls are effected by our physical bodies, if they exist, I might consider getting myself frozen if my OCD ends up going back to taking 24 hours a day.
 
Upvote 0