• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Could Christ have sinned.

k4c

Well-Known Member
Nov 3, 2003
4,278
39
Rhode Island
✟4,820.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I came across some people that said that Christians do not believe that Christ could have sinned and failed in his mission on earth. Well then how could he be 'tempted in the desert?"Where does this idea come from?

It probably came for the same minds that believe Mary was without sin.
 
Upvote 0

Pythons

Well-Known Member
Feb 17, 2008
4,215
226
✟5,503.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I came across some people that said that Christians do not believe that Christ could have sinned and failed in his mission on earth. Well then how could he be 'tempted in the desert?"Where does this idea come from?


Where did you "come upon" these people and "who" are they? Are you sure you didn't post the argument "those" people gave for why they teach Christ was PECCABLE? I say this because you just quoted the argument used by groups who maintain Christ was peccable. And I mean to a "T".

The only denominations I know of that teach Christ was peccable are those who hail from an Adventist source such as the Jehovah's Witnesses, Christadelphians, WWCOG, etc, etc.

The Catholic Church, Orthodox Church, Lutheran, Baptist, Methodist all reject the notion that Christ was peccable (could have sinned) and claim it is heresy.

The Fifth General Council of Constantinople in 553 openly CONDEMNED the teaching that Christ only became impeccable after the Resurrection. This means that every denomination that sprang from Orthodox sources would reject the notion that Christ was Peccable as heresy of the worst sort.


It would be interesting if you could direct me to the those individuals who claim that if Christ "couldn't sin" then He failed. I would really like to have the chance to discuss this with them.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

reddogs

Contributor
Site Supporter
Dec 29, 2006
9,229
512
✟553,269.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Lets get to scripture and see what it says.

  1. Matthew 4:1 Then was Jesus led up of the Spirit into the wilderness to be tempted of the devil.
  2. Mark 1:13 And he was there in the wilderness forty days, tempted of Satan; and was with the wild beasts; and the angels ministered unto him.
  3. Luke 4:2 Being forty days tempted of the devil. And in those days he did eat nothing: and when they were ended, he afterward hungered.
If Christ could not sin, then there was nothing He could do to prove Satan wrong when he came in the flesh, as temptation was not possible.

Hebrews 2:14-18
Forasmuch then as the children are partakers of flesh and blood, he also himself likewise took part of the same; that through death he might destroy him that had the power of death, that is, the devil; 15And deliver them who through fear of death were all their lifetime subject to bondage. 16For verily he took not on him the nature of angels; but he took on him the seed of Abraham. 17Wherefore in all things it behoved him to be made like unto his brethren, that he might be a merciful and faithful high priest in things pertaining to God, to make reconciliation for the sins of the people. 18For in that he himself hath suffered being tempted, he is able to succour them that are tempted.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Pythons

Well-Known Member
Feb 17, 2008
4,215
226
✟5,503.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican


Hi Reddogs, I've taken the liberty of making BOLD and coloring red the context of your quoted scriptures above. Read them and let me know what you think.
 
Upvote 0

Pythons

Well-Known Member
Feb 17, 2008
4,215
226
✟5,503.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Do you really believe that God can sin? Or do you believe Christ wasn't/isn't God?

In Christ alone...


If I could change anything about what you wrote above I would; Just add the word "WHY" to the first sentence and replace the first two words of the second sentence with another "WHY".
 
Upvote 0
O

OntheDL

Guest
Not at all. I would affirm that Christ was never 'not God' and that God cannot sin.

Yes, agreed.

However Jesus was fully divine, yet fully human at the same time in the same being. While the divinity could not have sinned, the humanity was fully capable.

When Jesus was tempted, He did not use His own divine power, He relied on the power of the Father.

Hebrews 5:7 Who in the days of his flesh, when he had offered up prayers and supplications with strong crying and tears unto him that was able to save him from death, and was heard in that he feared;

It was the Father who delivered Him from temptation so He did not sin, not by His own. His own human nature was fully capable of sinning. Notice the following verse.

Hebrews 5:8 Though he were a Son, yet learned he obedience by the things which he suffered;

Though He was the Son of God, He had to learn obedience from the things He suffered because He didn't naturally know to obey.
 
Upvote 0

freeindeed2

In Christ We Are FREE!
Feb 1, 2007
31,130
20,046
56
A mile high.
✟87,197.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Those texts do not indicate that God/Christ could sin. Christ and the Father were one (just like always). God cannot sin. Suffering is not sinning.

In Christ alone...
 
Upvote 0

Pythons

Well-Known Member
Feb 17, 2008
4,215
226
✟5,503.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Christ the Divine could not have sinned. But Christ the Man was fully capable. Are you denying Christ came in the flesh?

Sacred Scripture speaks of this condition,

James 1 said:
A double minded man is unstable in all his ways.



The following is what Ellen White taught on the subject,

Ellen White said:
Was the human nature of the Son of Mary changed into the divine nature of the Son of God? No, the two natures were mysteriously BLENDED in one person--the Man Christ Jesus.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

SoldierOfTheKing

Christian Spenglerian
Jan 6, 2006
9,242
3,050
Kenmore, WA
✟293,968.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
Perhaps we could say that He could have sinned, but He certainly would not have sinned. His perfect obedience to the Law was a necessary condition of His sinlessness. Had He broken the Law at any point, it would have been a sin, which is why He kept the Law. As God, however, sin was contrary to His nature, and He certainly would have no part in it. He was tempted, as Adam was before the fall, (before he sinned) but Christ was to succeed where Adam failed.
 
Upvote 0

Pythons

Well-Known Member
Feb 17, 2008
4,215
226
✟5,503.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican

If He could have sinned He would have been guilty of sin right out of the gate. James 1, 15.
 
Upvote 0

cesty

Philippians 4:19
Jul 29, 2008
730
68
Visit site
✟23,825.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
If He could have sinned He would have been guilty of sin right out of the gate. James 1, 15.

Did Adam sin? He certainly did. But was he guilty of sin when God had created him? Obviously not. Yet he was capable of making a choice to sin and did just that.

With that said, why is it so hard to believe that Jesus could have chosen to turn from the path of righteousness but didn't? How could He have been tempted to sin if He had never had a choice in the matter? And what sense was there in saying that "He learned obedience by the things which He suffered" if He had no choice but to be obedient (see Hebrews 5:8)? You do believe that Jesus is God, right? How could God learn obedience when He already knows all things (Isa. 46:10)? Moreover, you referred to James 1:15; but didn't you notice verse 13 which says, "God cannot be tempted by evil...?" Yet Jesus, being God, was tempted in all points like as we are, but didn't sin (Heb. 4:15).
It appears to me that you are ignoring the fact that Jesus was also human, or that you just don't know what that means. It also appears that you don't believe that He had free will. But maybe you do believe that He had free will. If that is the case, then why is it so hard for you to believe that Jesus could have exercised His free will in such a way as to yield to temptation?

Note: I am not saying that Jesus sinned. What I am suggesting is that Jesus was not only Divine; He also had a human nature. Furthermore, Adam was not sinful when God created him; yet he was human. That is, he was created with a human nature, not a sinful one (not prior to the fall anyway). And so Jesus, like Adam, had a human nature, but wasn't sinful. And Just as Adam had freedom of choice, Jesus also had freedom of choice. The difference however, was that Adam chose to sin and Jesus didn't. But both had free will and exercised it to make a choice; you can't make a choice without having more than one option. And if you have more than one option then it is possible for you to choose either one.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

reddogs

Contributor
Site Supporter
Dec 29, 2006
9,229
512
✟553,269.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others

I think this is the correct direction, as Christ was made flesh like Adam and was tempted just like we are, so is able to succour them (that means us) that are tempted...

Main Entry: 1suc·cor
Pronunciation: \ˈsə-kər\
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English socour, sucurs (taken as plural), from Anglo-French sucur, sucors, from Medieval Latin succursus, from Latin succurrere to run to the rescue, bring aid, from sub- + currere to run — more at car
Date: 13th century
1 : relief; also : aid, help
2 : something that furnishes relief

Main Entry: 2succor
Function: transitive verb
Inflected Form(s): suc·cored; suc·cor·ing \ˈsə-k(ə-)riŋ\
Date: 13th century
: to go to the aid of : relieve
 
Upvote 0

catmommy

Member
Feb 9, 2008
154
10
✟23,139.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Single
Christ had the ability to sin. He was a second Adam- a man that was not born in sin but still retained his free will. Anyone who has free will has the ability to make the wrong decision. Jesus was sent to earth for two reasons. He was to die for the sins of humanity and also show us how to live. If he came without the ability to sin and without true understanding of the human condition, the argument could still be made that God was asking us to do the impossible. By being tempted as we are and having the ability to fall he proves to humanity that we are capable of living as God commands us. I think the theology of Jesus remaining God while being human is confusing and unbiblical. The focus of Jesus on earth is that he was human. Trying to understand how this was achieved and trying to work out this in our human minds creates more problems than it solves.
 
Upvote 0

freeindeed2

In Christ We Are FREE!
Feb 1, 2007
31,130
20,046
56
A mile high.
✟87,197.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Christ had the ability to sin.
Then, according to your post, God can sin, for Christ was FULLY God.

catmommy said:
He was a second Adam- a man that was not born in sin but still retained his free will.
He couldn't have been 'born into sin', he was God.

catmommy said:
Anyone who has free will has the ability to make the wrong decision.
Does God have 'free will'? Can he sin?

He didn't ask us to 'do the impossible'. God asks us to believe in his Son for our salvation.

catmommy said:
By being tempted as we are and having the ability to fall he proves to humanity that we are capable of living as God commands us.
Being tempted is not sin. What is it that God can 'fall' to? Are you 'living as God commands' you? If not, why not?

catmommy said:
I think the theology of Jesus remaining God while being human is confusing and unbiblical.
The Bible is clear that Jesus IS/WAS/ALWAYS WILL BE/ALWAYS HAS BEEN God is completely biblical.

catmommy said:
The focus of Jesus on earth is that he was human.
The focus of Jesus was that God came down to save lost people who could not save themselves. Jesus and the Father were/are ONE. He was the Word in flesh to redeem fallen humanity.

catmommy said:
Trying to understand how this was achieved and trying to work out this in our human minds creates more problems than it solves.
We should simply trust that Jesus meant what he said as he revealed his nature in scripture and made humanly audacious claims to be equal with God.

In Christ alone...
 
Upvote 0

catmommy

Member
Feb 9, 2008
154
10
✟23,139.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Single
 
Upvote 0

Pythons

Well-Known Member
Feb 17, 2008
4,215
226
✟5,503.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Christ had the ability to sin. He was a second Adam- a man that was not born in sin but still retained his free will.

Unless you are prepared to accept that God created, into Adam, evil desires that pulled Adam and Eve internally toward breaking God's Law you can't use this, for Adam was tempted externally - he was not pulled toward this act by his own evil lust to do it.


cat said:
Anyone who has free will has the ability to make the wrong decision

Adam had free will w/out concupiscence Vs man after Adam has free will w/ concupiscence.

A man is tempted WHEN he is drawn away by HIS own EVIL desires. This "evil" desire is "UN-PERFECTED SIN", it's NOT, as you are suggesting NOT SIN.

James 1 said:
and each one is tempted, by his own desires being led away and enticed,

afterward the desire having conceived, doth give birth to sin, and the sin having been perfected, doth bring forth death.


EVERY single Translation I've look at renders it the same. If Christ was tempted within Himself ( like you and I ) the inception of that event, no matter the shortness of duration DEFAULTS that a microscopic "larva" of sin resided in Christ because EACH ONE is tempted by their OWN desires. If you seriously think about what you are saying is that Satan had something in Christ but Christ never FULLY PERFECTED "HIS" SIN.



Jesus Christ! said:
Hereafter I will not talk much with you: for the prince of this world cometh, and hath NOTHING in me

Catmommy, if 1000 people come up and "tempt" you YOU are ONLY tempted to do those things YOU DESIRE or LUST FOR. If you have to RESIST a temptation so you don't YIELD to it that means YOUR OWN evil desire is trying to GET OUT OF YOU AND PERFECT ITSELF. You are maintaining that Satan had something in Christ which equates to Christ having an evil desire but thank Father God Jesus was able to not yield to HIS evil lust and not perfect HIS SIN.

/ temptedThat's why the Bible says related to OUR "infirmities" ( sin's effect on our body - hunger - pain - thirst -wanting to live- etc ) that Christ was tested in ALL ways "APART FROM SIN".


Jesus is our creator! Does a preacher need to be a prostitue prior to helping a prostitute? Does a doctor need to contract HIV prior to treating someone with HIV? Of course not.

catmommy said:
By being tempted as we are and having the ability to fall he proves to humanity that we are capable of living as God commands us.

"Apart from SIN" = OUTSIDE OF SIN and if Christ was ever tempted to tell a lie and needed to resist HIS OWN EVIL DESIRES to do so then Jesus wasn't the Christ.

catmommy said:
I think the theology of Jesus remaining God while being human is confusing and unbiblical.

You don't say.



Luke 1 said:
And the angel answered and said unto her, The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee, and the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee: therefore also that holy thing which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God.

Luke 7 said:
Then Jesus answering said unto them, Go your way, and tell John what things ye have seen and heard; how that the blind see, the lame walk, the lepers are cleansed, the deaf hear, the dead are raised, to the poor the gospel is preached.

catmommy said:
The focus of Jesus on earth is that he was human. Trying to understand how this was achieved and trying to work out this in our human minds creates more problems than it solves.

Take it to the bank, God became man w/out ceasing to be God. Having such a feverish focus on Jesus having to resist HIS OWN evil desires creates some massive problems theologically IMHO.
 
Upvote 0