Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Can you be specific?
Ya ... ex nihilo & ex materia are codewords for "we don't know," aren't they?Sure. Creationist know they will never know how God created stuff,
Ya ... ex nihilo & ex materia are codewords for "we don't know," aren't they?
No.Ya ... ex nihilo & ex materia are codewords for "we don't know," aren't they?
Fair enough.No.
'From what' is not the same as 'how'.
Yes He spoke. Let there be light and there was light.Fair enough.
The Bible say God "spoke/spake" and it was done.
More confused now?
Um ... alrighty then.Yes He spoke. Let there be light and there was light.
I don't assume that every last word He spoke was recorded. Just as everything that Jesus said and did would have filled too many books, so could the creation event have been.
the most important point here is that we can prove the existence of the designer: My favorite argument for the existence of God
Creationists try to prove; Scientists, I'm not sure what 'evolutionists' are, try to disprove.
Creationists agree on what is true; Scientists, no matter how much supporting evidence there is, always have some doubt.
Thanks, but no thanks. I have faith in my salvation in Christ already. It doesn't require that evolution be disproved.Creationists try to disprove evolution in order to support creation. Neither can be proven scientifically although either can be believed. We are also trying to save evolutionists from wandering too far from Godly tenets as this isn't good for humanity.
That indicates a common ancestry, descendant from a single living cell..
The reason is, we not only see the same DNA with variations, we see the same (physical design) repeated over and over again.
Especially as there was no one around to record His words.I don't assume that every last word He spoke was recorded.
True, neither can be proven. However, creationism is based solely on religious beliefs with no supporting evidence, while evolution is based on scientific research and has overwhelming scientific, supporting evidence support. Unlike creationists, scientists always have at least a modicum of doubt no matter how much support a theory has, because that is how science works. Creationists say G-d or some creator did it and leave no room for doubt. Scientists say that this is what the evidence shows now, but the conclusion will change if further knowledge, for which scientists are looking, shows that our conclusion is invalid.Creationists try to disprove evolution in order to support creation. Neither can be proven scientifically although either can be believed. We are also trying to save evolutionists from wandering too far from Godly tenets as this isn't good for humanity.
.That indicates a common ancestry, descendant from a single living cell.
In order find indications of a designer, you first have to believe in a designer.
Religious thought in a nut shell..
Of course there is only one God and Creator of the Universe, there is no other.
1) There has always been only One Code Writer.
2) God holds the Patents, and the Copyrights.
3) Point being, with only one Designer and one Code, there isn't any differentiation, by the mere fact there aren't any other Designers using any Code whatsoever.
We don't believe because of Scientific proof, we believe in Faith, Scientific proof only reinforces the existence of a God which has Created what Science says exists.
3) Point being, with only one Designer and one Code, there isn't any differentiation, by the mere fact there aren't any other Designers using any Code whatsoever.
Your statement about "....wandering away form G-dly tenets...." only applies to your beliefs, not to mine. Read my signature and you will see that.
.If there were multiple designers using a common standard, you wouldn't be able to differentiate that though.
So it's a bit of a moot point, I suppose.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?