Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
ah... so here is the other side of the argument, if fits HER and HER alone, because of what she did, etcetera etcetera....
which is it guys, is EVERYONE a co-redeemer, or just Mary?
Either way, it's very wrong.
sorry, you know a Judge who has the title "merciful?"
And merciful judge fits Jesus just as well as it does all human merciful judges.
So wich one is it?
She can be called co-redeemer in the order of Grace.<<<<< Notice the qualifer here
Peace
I know.. my point was in the context of liturgical worship, we do refer to Jesus by his "bible only" title.I was addressing the list given, Bene.
Absolutely not, I'm hung up on the truth.
Im hung up on Jesus, and He doesn't share
His glory with a co-anything.
I guess whatever the angel called her would
be what God called her and would be a fine title.
I think you are overlooking the point.I know.. my point was in the context of liturgical worship, we do refer to Jesus by his "bible only" title.
We all give him titles and it's not wrong to do that. The bible does not tell us we can't do that.
So we're just trying to figure out why you all say we can't give Mary a title? You do not have to agree with the title we give and I don't have to either.
Like "Lamb of God," some of Mary's titles can not be argued against, like Mother of God. But Co Redeemer can. You are free to disagree with this and so am I.
The point is, why can't we give her a title though? You all give them to Christ? Right?
.
ah, so I suppose everything you do now that is a "good work" is attributed to you as righteousness?
talking about ascriptural? and error? please.
I think you are overlooking the point.
Adding a title for the SAKE of a title, is what I said.
because if it were true what you say, about us all being
co-redeemers in our actions, then it would be a title we should all share, not just given to Mary.
It is applied to Mary, however, so that she can have yet another title in the long pantheon of Marian Devotion.
ah... so your righteousness comes from your works.When it's done in faith, in Christ- darn right it is. We don't believe in that substitutionary imputed righteousness stuff.
.
sorry, you know a Judge who has the title "merciful?"
explain your qualifier.
Do not confuse the reason Christmas is celebrated with the Incarnation.
Celebrating birthdays is a Chaldean tradition based on Astrology. Job was making atoning sacrifices for his children's birthday parties in the opening chapter of the book that bears his name.
Classic example of confusion by equivocation.
ah... so your righteousness comes from your works.
interesting. False, but interesting.
(suggest a biblegateway search on righteousness.....)
Baloney.
"When there is sin there is no grace when there is grace there is no sin."
Grace is where sin is, because that is where it is needed
[/QUOTE]
Red herring.
This is what I posted.
Sin and grace the opposites of eahc other. When there is sin there is no grace when there is grace there is no sin.
Filled completely with grace as she was there was no sin on her.
Peace
ah... so your righteousness comes from your works.
interesting. False, but interesting.
(suggest a biblegateway search on righteousness.....)
What a bunch if pseudo-knowledge.
Christmass is because of the Incanation.
Peace
Romans 5:20-21"When there is sin there is no grace when there is grace there is no sin."
Grace is where sin is, because that is where it is needed.
Apart from Christ we aren't and cannot
be righteous.
He is our righteousness.
Which I'm sure you knew anyhow.
Maybe Bene is talking about
acting righteous, not being righteousness
enough by her own works.
1 John 3:7
7 Little children, let no man deceive you:
he that doeth righteousness is righteous,
even as he is righteous.
Here Bene, this is what UB is speaking of,
not OT stuff.
Romans 4:5-6
5 But to him that worketh not,
but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly,
his faith is counted for righteousness.
6 Even as David also describeth the blessedness of the man,
unto whom God imputeth
righteousness without works,
Romans 10:2-5
2 For I bear them record that they have a zeal of God,
but not according to knowledge.
3 For they being ignorant of God's righteousness,
and going about to establish their own righteousness,
have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God.
4 For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness
to every one that believeth.
5 For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law,
That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
Apart from Christ we aren't and cannot
be righteous.
He is our righteousness.
Which I'm sure you knew anyhow.
sunlover
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?