Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Would it be all right with you if I addressed this in a PM?Constant witness:
I am missing your point regarding the uncircumsised man being too sensitive and thus "less" sensitive to the female's "needs". Sorry. Without being to graphic do you mind explaining. I've often wondered what he mean and sometimes I though it might men that an uncircumsized man could not handle certain sexual activities that a circumsized man could. However, my arguement back to him is that a more sensitive male in this area would be more in tune to his body, preventing release, and thus being more sensitive to his wife.
You know, I'm going to be a horrible parent. I don't see anything sensual about breastfeeding or changing diapers. I can see the intimacy in breast feeding, but intimacy doesn't automatically mean to me sensual/sexual... I definately see nothing sensual or intimate about changing a diaper. I see that as mom or dad changing the diaper of baby so they're not wallowing in their own waste. And doing those acts, pretty much the last thing on my mind is their sexuality. Yes, those acts involve "private parts" or "sexual parts" as defined by Americans, but just because something involves a breast, genitals, or nudity, I don't think it's the blossoming of a sexual experience.
Really, when I look at any baby, or even picture my own future baby, I've never thought "Hey man, I hope that when you're of age, you'll really have lots of fun having sex, because man oh man, it's great."
In the end, though, I think that theorizing about the sexual gratification one may or may not have in the future if they do or don't have a circumcision is kind of like theorizing how much your adult child will enjoy drinking alcohol. Somebody's enjoyment from taking a drink, much like having sex, varies a lot depending on a whole lot of factors, certainly more complicated than if they have a foreskin or not. I think it's kind of like trying to make plans to go to the beach on a weather prediction that it will be sunny on July 17th, 2025... You just don't know.
I would use this information as part of my decision, yes; coupled with other information regarding health concerns, pain infliction, and appearance.So if somebody were to say "I've known several people who had foreskins who found sex less enjoyable, which is why I opted to circumsice my son" you'd consider that a valid reason to circumcise?
I, too, have heard of accounts such as these men described to your husband. In the research I've done, I've found that these are typically accounts of men whose foreskins were not retracted enough through their child-hood and youth; so that by the time they reached adult-hood, their foreskins were not prepared for mature sexual relations. I'm certain this was not the case for ALL the accounts as were reported to your husband, as well as not the case for all the accounts as were presented to me in my research. In talking with our pediatrician, however, he assured us that it was likely the case for MOST of the men who report such accounts.Tropical Wilds said:My husband was stationed over in Germany, and he knew several men who opted for adult circumcision because they found sex not enjoyable due to their foreskin. They were willing to go through a procedure that was, by all accounts, absolutely horrible to go through as an adult due to the sexual disatisfaction, and all said that sex post-circumcision was significantly more enjoyable than with their foreskins.
I would view it as a viable addition to the argument supporting circumcision, yes. I would take it into consideration and further my research (as I did when our son was born).Tropical Wilds said:If one can argue to not have a child circumcised due to future sexual satisfaction, would you view it as viable an argument to have a child circumcised due to future sexual satisfaction and the paired desire to not have them do a procedure that becomes more painful as they grow up so as to bring about said sexual satisfaction after the potential trauma experincing sexual inadequacies/issues?
You know, I'm going to be a horrible parent. I don't see anything sensual about breastfeeding or changing diapers. I can see the intimacy in breast feeding, but intimacy doesn't automatically mean to me sensual/sexual... I definately see nothing sensual or intimate about changing a diaper. I see that as mom or dad changing the diaper of baby so they're not wallowing in their own waste. And doing those acts, pretty much the last thing on my mind is their sexuality. Yes, those acts involve "private parts" or "sexual parts" as defined by Americans, but just because something involves a breast, genitals, or nudity, I don't think it's the blossoming of a sexual experience.
Really, when I look at any baby, or even picture my own future baby, I've never thought "Hey man, I hope that when you're of age, you'll really have lots of fun having sex, because man oh man, it's great."
In the end, though, I think that theorizing about the sexual gratification one may or may not have in the future if they do or don't have a circumcision is kind of like theorizing how much your adult child will enjoy drinking alcohol. Somebody's enjoyment from taking a drink, much like having sex, varies a lot depending on a whole lot of factors, certainly more complicated than if they have a foreskin or not. I think it's kind of like trying to make plans to go to the beach on a weather prediction that it will be sunny on July 17th, 2025... You just don't know.
What utter rubbish. Another fable and scare mongering about circ'ing.
Good grief what will they think of next.
I dont know how it works in the States but here in Canada we have to pay for Circumsision...and its the choice of the parent...we were given both sides presented and allowed time to make a decision...a fair one and we choose what we did (in our case we circumsized-no painkillers were used as the nurse and doctors said tht the baby did not feel pain that they cried because they were being held down...took one clip and they were done-oldest had a bell, 2nd had nothing)Due in a couple weeks with our first son, Lucas.
That being said...found out at Drs. appt today that my insurance doesn't cover circumcision. That being said, it brought up lots of questions, and in that, wanted to ask some here...
What are your thoughts on circumcision? Aside from the religious reasons people have, what do you think about it? Yea or Nay?
I've done lots and lots of reading today. Prior to finding out about the insurance my husband and I had agree to have our son circumsized, but now we face the decision with a great more thought.
Help!Thoughts please?
Though you may perceive it as utter rubbish, it's merely informational. I encourage you, or anyone who's considering circumcision to research the topic in depth before making the decision
I never made that presumption about you, or anyone. The only things I've done in my post are to encourage people to look into the matter for themselves and to recognize that there is research and opinion available that supports the idea of non-circumcision.Do not presume, ever, that this subject has not been looked into or researched before hand.
My encouragement to seek a well-founded decision was for anyone reading this thread who might be making that decision.Also it is a bit late to be giving me this advice as all of my boys are circ'ed, and the eldest is 21, the youngest is 1yr. I also am married to a man for over 25 years who also is circ'ed, hence my statement about the above being "utter rubbish".
Let's hope that people who have never had to make that decision have an opportunity to hear the arguments for and against circumcision. Let's hope that by reading threads like these, they may have a better understanding of the pro's and con's of circumcision, and of the very real emotions tied into making such decisions.It was not you who was shunned, had doors slammed in your face, verbally abused, and ridiculed for having your children circ'ed, especially when it was by people who had never had to make that decision or by people who didn't even have children.
My condolences for the pain and suffering her children received because of the decisions she made. Likewise, you have my condolences for the ridicule you received for making the decision for circumcising your sons.If you have read this whole thread, you would have read where my sister, who is the educated one, and has the doctorate, didn't circ her children because she knew better, and then because of constant infections requiring hospitalization, had all her boys circ'ed.
Which is why it is so important that both the arguments for and against be presented--such that persons who are in the throes of making this decision are well-informed.You would have also read post 43, which is more of the "scare tactics" and offensive statements that are used. For every "research paper, and study" done against circ'ing, I can find just as many debunking the nay sayers.
I have no intention of getting into religious discussion regarding circumcision, but I will say this: what of the fact that God created men perfectly in His image, and did not require Adam (who was made perfect) to have this procedure?If our God requested this of His covenant people, regardless of whether you believe it was only for the Jews and not for the Gentiles, why would he give this command that would make His man deformed? in what ever way you want to percieve this "deformity"? The God we serve is a God of righteousness, love and compassion, not a God that would deliberately "mutilate" His men. It just doesn't make sense to me.
I do pray that you don't feel as if I've berated you in any way. I don't intend to do so, and I truly respect your decision that you've made; from what you've said, it was well-informed. For what it's worth, the reason many people who choose not to circumcise their sons are defensive of their choice is that circumcision is expected of them and they are often ridiculed as well. Perhaps it's simply a matter of the "grass is always greener"?It is also interesting that the people who are most upset about this issue, are people who don't circ. In all of the circles that I have been in, I am yet to hear any one who believes in circ'ing, berate someone who hasn't circ'ed their kids, but I have heard and experienced many the other way around.
I am pleased to hear that your decision is one that yo don't regret. Is it possible that you might regard my decision in an equal light--well-informed and "right" for my family?Personally it is a decision that neither myself or my husband have ever regreted doing, and over the years have never had second thoughts about. Sadly though, my sister cannot say the same.
Tracey
I also find that the anti-circ'ing people tend to be rather nasty about(and to) those of us who do circ, while those of us who circ our boys could care Less if someone else circ's their boys or not.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?