• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

wintermile

Bioconservative
May 9, 2011
1,320
35
✟24,222.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I would rather be harassed by christian dominionists than christian swingers.

These swingers use faith to demonstrate they do not love the law.

Of the numerous individuals who will accept Yeshua's gift of salvation during end times, none of the individuals will name swingers as witnesses.
 
Upvote 0

Serendipity..

sǝɹǝupıdıʇʎ
May 23, 2011
771
40
✟16,215.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Now what makes me think that won't catch on or last long..

Maybe this:
1 Corinthians 6
Do you not know that your bodies are members of Christ himself? Shall I then take the members of Christ and unite them with a prostitute? Never! 16 Do you not know that he who unites himself with a prostitute is one with her in body? For it is said, “The two will become one flesh.”b 17But whoever is united with the Lord is one with him in spirit.c
 
Upvote 0

Serendipity..

sǝɹǝupıdıʇʎ
May 23, 2011
771
40
✟16,215.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private

Thats the thing, they might end up being faithful believers later that are led astray by wrong teachings and sexual desires of youth for a while. They can think about it paying for child maintenance and divorces afterwards.
 
Upvote 0

Eudaimonist

I believe in life before death!
Jan 1, 2003
27,482
2,738
58
American resident of Sweden
Visit site
✟126,756.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Libertarian
Is it morally acceptable for Christians to engage in "swinging"?

Moral according to what standard?

If you mean moral according to Pauline sexual morality, almost certainly not.


eudaimonia,

Mark
 
Upvote 0

Jonathan95

Veteran
Sep 13, 2011
2,132
78
29
Sweden
✟26,977.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Moral according to what standard?

If you mean moral according to Pauline sexual morality, almost certainly not.


eudaimonia,

Mark

Your conscience tells you it's immoral.

Who are the victims and what is the sin?

What do you mean who are the victims? The sin is commited against a Holy God. It's self-seeking love, lust, which is not of God.
 
Upvote 0

madaz

dyslexic agnostic insomniac
Mar 14, 2012
1,408
26
Gold Coast Australia
✟24,455.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Your conscience tells you it's immoral.
What do you mean who are the victims?
The sin is commited against a Holy God. It's self-seeking love, lust, which is not of God.

An immoral act produces a victim, that is a reason why it is immoral. Are you suggesting god is being victimized here?
 
Upvote 0

Rajni

☯ Ego ad Eum pertinent ☯
Site Supporter
Dec 26, 2007
8,567
3,943
Visit site
✟1,373,667.00
Country
United States
Faith
Unorthodox
Marital Status
Single
[FONT=verdana,sans-serif]Wow. That's .... interesting!

It's probably not seen as moral if certain bible verses are used, but the bible is very ... flexible ... so one could use it to justify pretty much anything.

[/FONT]
I'm just speculating here .... I'm wondering how successful the average swinging-couple (Christian or otherwise) is in sustaining their primary relationships with their spouses doing it this way.

The reason I say this, is that in the Old Testament, 'biblical marriage' consisted of multiple people (wives/concubines ... I don't recall multiple husbands but it's been awhile since I cracked open one of my bibles). Such arrangements could've had (theoretically) a better chance of enduring because the pressure isn't on just one individual to make the other happy (at least, in the physical-relations front, which can be a point of friction in many relationships if the drives are not equal). In such arrangements, if one wife had a 'headache' and didn't feel like makin' whoopie on any given night, there would be someone else available amongst the group who might be more inclined to do so.

Nowadays, marriage is generally between just two individuals, which might be one reason why marriages based on the monogamy-model go flat after awhile.

Edit: All the above is to say that maybe swingers are on to something, and the way OT marriages were done is a clue.

[FONT=verdana,sans-serif]Disclaimer: This is all assuming that sexual relations are seen by the couple in question as absolutely critical in a marriage. If the people involved are asexual, then the absence of sex isn't going to cause the marriage to come tumbling down. [/FONT]
[FONT=verdana,sans-serif]

-
[/FONT]
 
Upvote 0

Shemjaza

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Apr 17, 2006
6,466
4,001
47
✟1,122,435.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
AU-Greens
Kind of a silly question really. ONe can't be christian and swing. Thats like saying married but single. Or you like pizza but hate sauce, dough and cheese.

I'm willing to accept that in most Christian variations both swinging and any form of polyamory are right out... but doing something wrong doesn't usually kick you out of the club, does it?
 
Upvote 0
D

dies-l

Guest
I'm willing to accept that in most Christian variations both swinging and any form of polyamory are right out... but doing something wrong doesn't usually kick you out of the club, does it?

Doing something wrong? No. But, a lifestyle that is built around brazenly disregarding a central aspect of biblical morality is pretty solid evidence that one doesn't really want to be "part of the club".
 
Upvote 0

wintermile

Bioconservative
May 9, 2011
1,320
35
✟24,222.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Thats the thing, they might end up being faithful believers later that are led astray by wrong teachings and sexual desires of youth for a while. They can think about it paying for child maintenance and divorces afterwards.

And Yeshua receives the glory. Yeshua knows His sheep.

A proper christian reponse is to contact the owner in order to hold him/her accountable.

Another response is to pray.
 
Upvote 0

madaz

dyslexic agnostic insomniac
Mar 14, 2012
1,408
26
Gold Coast Australia
✟24,455.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Doing something wrong? No. But, a lifestyle that is built around brazenly disregarding a central aspect of biblical morality is pretty solid evidence that one doesn't really want to be "part of the club".

Are you suggesting the phineas priesthood, aryan nations, army of god, the covenant, the ku klux klan, the nlft, the iron guard, the lra, the ira, christian identity, hutaree, christian patriots and various other christian terrorist groups "dont really want to be" part of the club?
I can assure you these groups wouldn't claim to be christian if they didn't want to be part of it.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

ebia

Senior Contributor
Jul 6, 2004
41,711
2,142
A very long way away. Sometimes even further.
✟54,775.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
AU-Greens
madaz said:
An immoral act produces a victim, that is a reason why it is immoral. Are you suggesting god is being victimized here?
Well, that's one way of thinking about ethics, but it's not the only one.
 
Upvote 0

ebia

Senior Contributor
Jul 6, 2004
41,711
2,142
A very long way away. Sometimes even further.
✟54,775.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
AU-Greens
dies-l said:
Doing something wrong? No. But, a lifestyle that is built around brazenly disregarding a central aspect of biblical morality is pretty solid evidence that one doesn't really want to be "part of the club".
Are we still talking about the OP, or everyone in the western world?
 
Upvote 0