• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Christian God encourages abstaining from sexual relations

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,281
8,501
Milwaukee
✟411,038.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others

Unmarried people cannot commit adultery.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

BigV

Junior Member
Dec 27, 2007
1,093
267
48
USA, IL
✟49,404.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others

the inference is exactly as it’s written. God tells David, through the prophet, that he has given him wives(!) of Saul (why no mention of males placed unde David’s care?) and condemns David’s acting on his lust and having Uriah killed by placing him where the fiercest fighting took place.

why wasn’t David told to let Bathsheeba go? Why was she accepted as David’s yet another wife?

And David had concubines but never a word from the Lord condemning concubines, was there?

no wonder you’re still a Christian.
 
Upvote 0

BigV

Junior Member
Dec 27, 2007
1,093
267
48
USA, IL
✟49,404.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Uh... I wouldn't say that David's various romantic relationships are portrayed in anywhere near a positive light. Abandonment, adultery, and then he outright has Uriah killed so that he can cover up the affair that he was having with Bathsheba.

where is the word from the Lord condemning concubines or taking Bathsheba as his yet another wife? Uriah’s killing was condemned and punished but not taking Bathsheba as his yet another wife! Bathsheba’s first child with David died as a punishment but David continued in adultery with Bathsheba and bore Solomon!
 
Upvote 0

Silmarien

Existentialist
Feb 24, 2017
4,337
5,254
39
New York
✟223,224.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat

Are you arguing that the Old Testament condones adultery? Because yikes, that is right in the Ten Commandments.
 
Upvote 0

BigV

Junior Member
Dec 27, 2007
1,093
267
48
USA, IL
✟49,404.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Are you arguing that the Old Testament condones adultery? Because yikes, that is right in the Ten Commandments.

Old Testament condemns adultery but it’s not clear how it defines adultery. Clearly God doesn’t punish people for having multiple wives and for having sexual relations with one’s servants.

On the other hand, Old Testament condemns murder white explicitly commanding the killings of all women and children of some Of the Israel’s enemies.

as a matter of fact, when Moses was given 10 commandments, Israel was worshiping a golden calf. Read up on what the Levites were told to do. Hint: take their swords and kill each his neighbor and brother. This was commanded by God who is against murder!
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Silmarien

Existentialist
Feb 24, 2017
4,337
5,254
39
New York
✟223,224.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat

"Read up on what the Levites were told to do"?

Do you live in some sort of alternative universe where nobody reads the Pentateuch?

Back on topic, I really don't know what you're trying to argue. There is a lot of stuff in the Old Testament that is condoned without actually being endorsed. Having a king, for one, but I would say that polygamy is another example. People do it, but it's not really the ideal offered in Genesis, and it tends to be painted in a destructive light.

As for having sexual relationships with one's servants, that's a clear misrepresentation. If you look at Deuteronomy 21:10-14, for example, you'll find that you are not actually permitted to have sexual relations with captives without first marrying them. Yes, yes, I know that's still messed up by modern standards, but noticeably more humane than the sort of rampant abuse that was the norm elsewhere in the ancient world.
 
Upvote 0

BigV

Junior Member
Dec 27, 2007
1,093
267
48
USA, IL
✟49,404.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
"Read up on what the Levites were told to do"?

Do you live in some sort of alternative universe where nobody reads the Pentateuch?

Well, why the questions then? How can you ask me about Bible condoning adultery when you yourself know and quote Deut. 21:10-14? Isn't Deut. 21 a word of the Lord too?

Hence, I said it's not clear how adultery is defined. Certainly not as narrow as Jesus would define it.


NIV: Deut. 21:10 “When you go out to war against your enemies, and the Lord your God gives them into your hand and you take them captive, 11 and you see among the captives a beautiful woman, and you desire to take her to be your wife, 12 and you bring her home to your house, she shall shave her head and pare her nails. 13 And she shall take off the clothes in which she was captured and shall remain in your house and lament her father and her mother a full month. After that you may go in to her and be her husband, and she shall be your wife. 14 But if you no longer delight in her, you shall let her go where she wants. But you shall not sell her for money, nor shall you treat her as a slave, since you have humiliated her.

Very interesting teaching from the Lord here. It seems that marriage has not been defined as a union between one man and one woman, rather it was defined as having relations. I think we can conclude that adultery was taking another man's wife, so it was similar to stealing. If the woman with which a previously married man had relations was not married, it was not adultery. So, polygamy and having concubines is not explicitly forbidden and seems to have been practiced without a punishment from the Lord, who was quick to punish offenses, such as those in Numbers 15 (that I like to bring up constantly).
 
Upvote 0

Silmarien

Existentialist
Feb 24, 2017
4,337
5,254
39
New York
✟223,224.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Well, why the questions then? How can you ask me about Bible condoning adultery when you yourself know and quote Deut. 21:10-14? Isn't Deut. 21 a word of the Lord too?

You seem to think that the Bible condones the adulterous relationship between David and Bathsheba. That is crazy talk.


No, marriage is not defined merely as "having relations." There are a whole bunch of social and economic obligations attached to marriage.

I do not think anyone is claiming that polygamy is explicitly forbidden in the Old Testament. What I'm pointing out is that it's not really shown in a positive light. Not with Jacob, not with David, not with Solomon.
 
Upvote 0

BigV

Junior Member
Dec 27, 2007
1,093
267
48
USA, IL
✟49,404.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
You seem to think that the Bible condones the adulterous relationship between David and Bathsheba. That is crazy talk.

People got married in the Old Testament by having sex. That's clear in the verse I quoted.

Regarding Bathsheba, I think you are confusing condoning and encouragement. I think condoning is same as accepting and allowing. And this is exactly what we see in the Old Testament.

Sure, the Bible doesn't encourage adultery nor polygamy, but we see that David wasn't punished for living in adultery other than his firstborn son with Bathsheba being killed. Just contrast this with Jesus' teaching. Jesus made it sound as if people who divorce and marry others are living in adultery! David did not divorce any of his wives and did not forsake any of his concubines after taking Bathsheba to be his wife.

Just contrast it what happened to the poor chap in Numbers 15. There you see a swift condemnation of the "sinful" behavior.


It's good that you agree that polygamy is not explicitly forbidden in the Old Testament. The whole point of the OP is to show that a Christian God turned sharply away from the Old Testament, all the way to asceticism or close to it.

As far as marriage definition, you are right. People had relations with concubines and wives and slaves, so it was more than an intercourse. I stand corrected on that.
 
Upvote 0

ViaCrucis

Confessional Lutheran
Oct 2, 2011
39,673
29,282
Pacific Northwest
✟818,426.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others

Revelation, singular. There is no such thing as "the book of Revelations". Or, if you want to be old school, the Apocalypse of St. John. Am I being pedantic? Yes.

-CryptoLutheran
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

BigV

Junior Member
Dec 27, 2007
1,093
267
48
USA, IL
✟49,404.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Revelation, singular. There is no such thing as "the book of Revelations". Or, if you want to be old school, the Apocalypse of St. John. Am I being pedantic? Yes.

Book of Revelation - Wikipedia

The Book of Revelation, often called the Book of Revelations, Revelation to John, Apocalypse of John, The Revelation, or simply Revelation, the Revelation from Jesus Christ (from its opening words) or the Apocalypse, is the final book of the New Testament, and therefore also the final book of the Christian Bible.
 
Upvote 0

BNR32FAN

He’s a Way of life
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2017
25,856
8,382
Dallas
✟1,091,033.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married

There are some who try to remain chastened and often end up sinning worse than they would’ve if they had just gotten married.
 
Upvote 0

ViaCrucis

Confessional Lutheran
Oct 2, 2011
39,673
29,282
Pacific Northwest
✟818,426.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others

Often, but incorrectly, called "Revelations". It's a common error.

-CryptoLutheran
 
Upvote 0