Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I sent you a message apologising for coming across that way I hope that you will read the message I sent youJGG said:I also should point out an experience today on another thread. A person made a comment about an aspect of salvation. My response was that I didn't understand and proceeded to ask 5 questions. The response to all 5 questions was something like: "Our relationship with God is paved by the sacrifice of Jesus." Now, not only were my original 5 questions not actually answered, but I was given a "generic religious answer" which was basically just a rewording of the original statement. This kind of answer is meant to answer a variety of questions generally, but none specifically. That only raised several more questions. I'm sure this poster found his answer satisfying, but I didn't. This is how religion has always worked for me. I often see theists say to myself or other atheists when we've asked "too many questions" we're told "you just want to argue". It's not so much that as much as we generally have more questions than answers. These answers may satisfy you, but they don't work for me.
I think you missed the point. Some people are just analytical, others are inuitive.
I have a hard time seeing certain types movies with certain people. For instance, I just saw Interstellar and walked out with tons of questions and problems with the story. Don't get me wrong, I loved all the ideas about blackholes and passage of time stuff. But the story presented too many problems for me to let go. I find often that's how I enjoy a movie. As I result I tend to gravitate to comedies and documentaries. I especially like absurd comedies like Monty Python because they're not supposed to make sense.
There's a group on YouTube with videos with the title "Everything Wrong With..." and they pick apart a movie. I love these guys, I feel a certain kinship with them.
I also should point out an experience today on another thread. A person made a comment about an aspect of salvation. My response was that I didn't understand and proceeded to ask 5 questions. The response to all 5 questions was something like: "Our relationship with God is paved by the sacrifice of Jesus." Now, not only were my original 5 questions not actually answered, but I was given a "generic religious answer" which was basically just a rewording of the original statement. This kind of answer is meant to answer a variety of questions generally, but none specifically. That only raised several more questions. I'm sure this poster found his answer satisfying, but I didn't. This is how religion has always worked for me.
I often see theists say to myself or other atheists when we've asked "too many questions" we're told "you just want to argue". It's not so much that as much as we generally have more questions than answers. These answers may satisfy you, but they don't work for me.
What were the 5 questions?
I would point out that I presented that as an example, not to derail the thread. If someone really feels compelled to answer I can start an appropriate thread.
This 3-Question Quiz Predicts Whether You Believe in God | Big Think | Praxis
Before you put your martyrdom tunic on, it isn't the point of the quiz that IQ determines religious belief. The explanation for the reasoning behind the quiz is at the end of the article.
So, do the creators of the quiz have a point here?
eudaimonia,
Mark
So, I took the quiz and got one out of three correct, I'm not gonna lie. I had my husband answer the questions without telling him what it was about and he got them all correct. He's a Christian- for whatever that's worth.
Okay. That is interesting.
I don't know of any statistics to back up the claim in the article that this sort of test has some value in predicting whether one is an atheist or a theist, but it is clear that this test is probably not a very strong indicator.
eudaimonia,
Mark
Okay. That is interesting.
I don't know of any statistics to back up the claim in the article that this sort of test has some value in predicting whether one is an atheist or a theist, but it is clear that this test is probably not a very strong indicator.
eudaimonia,
Mark
I agree that it's probably not a strong indicator of who is an atheist or a theist.
Um, no. I'm pretty sure the people who put down the correct answers were simply confident of the correct answers. The information is all provided, and what I was "taught to do" is to use it properly. There's no absence of certainty and you don't have to make any assumptions. The correct answers were the obvious ones to me because I've been given similar problems multiple times in my education and I used the information given (I'm not saying this has anything to do with me being an atheist).well what really ticked me off about it is I knew both answers but put down the most obvious answer for the first two ..
because of that thing we are taught to do .
you know Oscam's razor, " Other, more complicated solutions may ultimately prove correct, but—in the absence of certainty—the fewer assumptions that are made, the better." so was it that the atheist were all in all rebellious and wanted to show off..
and the christians were doing what they were told and or taught to do?
I don't know of any statistics to back up the claim in the article that this sort of test has some value in predicting whether one is an atheist or a theist, but it is clear that this test is probably not a very strong indicator.
In study 1, as hypothesized, analytic thinking was significantly negatively associated with all three measures of religious belief, rReligiosity = 0.22, P = 0.003; rIntuitive = 0.15, P = 0.04; and rAgents = 0.18, P = 0.02. This result demon- strated that, at the level of individual differences, the tendency to analytically override intuitions in reasoning was associated with religious dis- belief, supporting previous findings (4).
The article has a link to the original Science article, where it lays out the correlations between the questions and religiosity. They aren't very strong, but are statistically significant
This 3-Question Quiz Predicts Whether You Believe in God | Big Think | Praxis
Before you put your martyrdom tunic on, it isn't the point of the quiz that IQ determines religious belief. The explanation for the reasoning behind the quiz is at the end of the article.
They aren't very strong, but are statistically significant
So you think all Christians are stupid?
I think that says more about you than about us.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?