Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Not if you have one or two witnesses...which might be a good idea regardless who does it.
Not if you have one or two witnesses...which might be a good idea regardless who does it.
Indeed; but if the baptism happened far away, or a long time ago, witnesses might be tricky to get hold of. That's why "baptismal certificates" exist.
Valid Body of Christ procedures ought to work everywhere all the time. Baptismal certificates might not be a good idea in North Korea.
But then, if a congregation is not going to accept a new member's statement, "Yes, I have been baptized by immersion," then maybe that's not a membership that ought to happen anyway.
It is best that an ordained minister baptized because he or she has a special calling to do the Ministry of Word and Sacrament and because he or she has been specifically trained to serve in the capacity.
However, there are times when an ordained minister is not available and there arises a situation when baptism is desired and must be done quickly. Anyone can baptize, even a non-Christian, insofar as the Baptismal Rite is done with water, in Trinitarian formula and theology, and with the intent to give an actual baptism (in other words, it wasn't done in practice or play).
In these Emergency Baptism situations, find out the persons name, make sure they truly intend to be baptized, have never been baptized before, and then say and do "N, I baptize you in the Name of the Father (pour water on the head), and of the Son (pour water on the head), and of the Holy Spirit (pour water on the head)." Do not attempt to solicit any sort of confession or affirmation of any kind (that's outside your prevue), and if there is someone who is ordained around (or at least someone who can serve in some official capacity, like a licensed and instituted Reader or Acolyte, or a Subdeacon), do not attempt to baptize unless directed to do so by the cleric.
And never baptize anyone who does not desire or has been baptized before. God works the grace in all baptisms; all the cleric or layperson does is perform the outward and visible rite (a real symbol, if one will). It has always been on record that "rebaptizing" is a serious offense.
A person who survives the encounter is not rebaptized. Instead, the individual should be brought to church at the most earliest convenient time to then be welcomed and be anointed with Chrism in churches or denominations with that ancient rite, as well as given charge officially to take roll in the Church, confess, affirm faith, and so on and so forth. The layperson who did the baptism should be present at the same time and can act as a witness.
Can a believer that has been baptized themselves baptize another believer?
Wow. I had No Idea that when people are baptized, they are merely baptized into a church! Is this the general belief? Or is it the belief among a few?
Wow. I had No Idea that when people are baptized, they are merely baptized into a church! Is this the general belief? Or is it the belief among a few?
Which posts say or suggest that?
The second one says it:...In your picture if you were baptised by a believer, then found a church and got baptised again, what happens if you move away from the area and settle in another church? Should you be baptised a third time?
I had an interesting discussion with a Baptist pastor once about this issue. His contention was that one is baptized into a local church and when one changes churches one must be rebaptized into the new church. This helps explain the amazingly large number of baptisms performed by such denominations as the Southern Baptist Convention.
It should be noted that not all Baptists believe this. Nevertheless, I view it as a serious error on their part.
...The most strict churches I've run into would require, at most, a letter or some communication with the previous church to indicate you were a member of a church that baptized by immersion.
I've never heard before of one that would require re-baptism of someone who had already been baptized by immersion, and I think most would consider that a heretical opinion that denied the basic efficacy of baptism.
...But then, if a congregation is not going to accept a new member's statement, "Yes, I have been baptized by immersion," then maybe that's not a membership that ought to happen anyway.
I had asked: "Wow. I had No Idea that when people are baptized, they are merely baptized into a church! Is this the general belief? Or is it the belief among a few?
Here are a couple:
The first, while not sayng that, seems to indicate it:
The second one says it:
I noted these posts also...
Here are a couple:
The first, while not sayng that, seems to indicate it:
....
No, no, no! I was not reading that the writers intended that people are baptized into churches. I should have been clearer. I was reading, in those first two mentioned notes, that the churches seemed to take that liberty to think that the people were baptized into them. And it amazes me, too, that in the bottom two mentioned notes, the churches did not believe the people but demanded proofs.
I believe any believer can baptize a new believer.
I don't see any problem getting baptized a 2nd time. What ever helps one feel they are committed to Jesus and walking with God.
I believe any believer can baptize a new believer.
I don't see any problem getting baptized a 2nd time. What ever helps one feel they are committed to Jesus and walking with God.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?