Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I dunno --- do they?
And if they do, he can tell them too.
Sin occurs --- you remember that word, don't you? Even though it is fast disappearing from our language?what happens when abstinence education fails?
Abstinence education has no cause-and-effect with pregnancies. How much education does it take to tell someone to say "No"?lots of unplanned pregnancies.
Little Princess walks the aisle with Little Prince.What happens when Daddy Dearest finds out Little Princes has been courted by all the guys?
Uh-huh.He wont... Thank god for Abortions.
Not if it's implemented.Ironic how abstinence only education is almost a direct cause of unwanted pregnancies.
Keep saying that --- you'll eventually believe it.Its almost like it was planned that way.
Assuming you meant What, and not Why, I'd say he didn't read (and heed) the Bible.
Well, if Thaumaturgy's point is that we don't need the Bible to do what is right --- and that doing right just comes naturally --- how's come atheists get abortions?No, I meant why. My fault, I didn't word that very well. How about this:
At any rate, he said "If an atheist treats a fellow human well". Why are you talking about an atheist, in your opinion, not treating a fellow human well?
Judges 17:6 said:In those days there was no king in Israel, but every man did that which was right in his own eyes.
Well if their is so many examples, care to share some that show a difference between the Effects of God manifested by people vs the effects of people doing good on their own.
If their are so many examples, it should be simple to show them.
OK, how about feed the monkey (Hindus vs atheist).
Asserting the that the Celtic gods were saints while doing so with threats of death or fire was an unforgivable atrocity. I don't agree that other peoples gods are angles. I think its wrong to destroy other peoples cultures as the christains did.
However, if you really beleave your argument, thier would be no need for missionaries. Clearly they dident get the memo.
I don't understand the reference, care to elaborate?
The short-term action is the same, the motivation is different, the goal is different, and there are many other differences.
Christianity was founded by the Prince of Peace.How does this apply to the topic of this thread, specifically Christianity vs Hinduism?
Christianity was founded by the Prince of Peace.
Hinduism is predicated on Shiva, the god of destrucion, as Shoko Asahara made plain.
(emphasis added).In the Yajurveda two contrary sets of attributes for both malignant or terrific (Sanskrit: rudra) and benign or auspicious (Sanskrit: śiva) forms can be found.(SOURCE)
That's pretty neat. "Time" is a destroyer. Which, as you no doubt know, is kind of metaphorically true. Time wipes away all things. But the point also seems to my mind that any supreme being who can bring can take. It is the nature of a transcendent god.Another of Shiva's fearsome forms is as Kāla (Sanskrit: काल, "Time", and as Mahākāla (Sanskrit: महाकाल , "Great Time", which ultimately destroys all things
...
In contrast, the name Śaṇkara (Sanskrit शङ्कर, "Beneficent" or "Conferring Happiness" reflects his benign form. (ibid)
Christianity was founded by the Prince of Peace.
Hinduism is predicated on Shiva, the god of destrucion, as Shoko Asahara made plain.
In other words, what I'm saying is that Christianity is founded upon the Prince of Peace, whereas Hinduism is predicated on Shiva, the god of destruction, as Shoko Asahara made plain.So in other words, what your saying is that to truly believe in the truth of Christianity over Hinduism, you must completely misunderstand and misinterpret the words and spirit of Hinduism via the use of oversimplification and other forms of logical fallacies?
In other words, what I'm saying is that Christianity is founded upon the Prince of Peace, whereas Hinduism is predicated on Shiva, the god of destruction, as Shoko Asahara made plain.
So in other words, what your saying is that to truly believe in the truth of Christianity over Hinduism, you must completely misunderstand and misinterpret the words and spirit of Hinduism via the use of oversimplification and other forms of logical fallacies?
In other words, what I'm saying is that Christianity is founded upon the Prince of Peace, whereas Hinduism is predicated on Shiva, the god of destruction, as Shoko Asahara made plain.
One of the most important, maybe even the most important gods of Hinduism is Brahman, traditionally depicted as a wise creator, while Christianity was founded by a man who physically assaulted people in a temple and said that he didn't "come to bring peace, but the sword." Furthermore, the violent nature of Christianity was demonstrated by Shoko Asahara, who declared himself Christ in 1992.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?