Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I suggest you try to eliminate those people so you can make a good contribution to human evolution.
I suggest you try to eliminate those people so you can make a good contribution to human evolution.
I suggest you try to eliminate those people so you can make a good contribution to human evolution.
Come on dude. ALWAYS ? I haven't read every single post of yours, but this is the first I remember such a hasty generalization sticking out.The fact that theists ALWAYS, not sometimes, ALWAYS jump to murder to try and describe survival of the fittest also disturbs me.
It's like all you think about is killing. Which means I don't want to invite you to Chipotle with me.
Come on dude. ALWAYS ? I haven't read every single post of yours, but this is the first I remember such a hasty generalization sticking out.
It's coolOkay I will dial it back. But seriously in my experience discussing the subject I haven't gotten one counter argument that didn't involve murdering someone in order to survive and claiming it to be "survival of the fittest." I know it doesn't describe every theist as there are some who understand and accept evolution. So yes, I do apologize.
But It's super childish and very frustrating to re-read this shoddy argument over and over and over and over. And Hitler is like Obligatory to bring up too. I'm so annoyed by this that yes, briefly I broke my normal neutral composure.
Ya has ta undastand. I gots ma limits.
I don't know what to say, there are good arguments against evolution, I can't remember well but I have seen them, because the scientific community has never had the same opinion on stuff.
Every piece of scientific information ever said by scientists is ultimately wrong. That is the nature of science. How can you trust what scientist says?
In contrast, it is much more important to focus on what YOU would say. If you said that evolution is proven, then you need to have it pass through YOUR mind, instead of the mind of scientist. Have YOU ever taken a good look on ANY of the so-called "evidence"?
I bet you, if you do, you will find out it does not work.
No satisfactory answer yet. It is my fault for not specificing "scientific" in the title. I don't believe evolution and I believe that God created us, but, there are a lot of people convinced about evolution so I want to hear their arguments, and there are a lot of people not so convinced about it and I want to hear their arguments too.
The fact that theists ALWAYS, not sometimes, ALWAYS jump to murder to try and describe survival of the fittest also disturbs me.
It's like all you think about is killing. Which means I don't want to invite you to Chipotle with me.
In terms of evolution, what is wrong with it? Don't talk about love. It does not exist in evolution.
Every piece? Really?!!? That's quite a statement. I'd like you to back that up. How can I trust what scientists say: The axioms, the primacy of existence and the objective method of knowledge. That's how.
I have looked at the evidence, although I'm not an expert, and I think the question isn't even debatable. Do I accept every word from the mouth of scientists? No, I accept them tentatively, based on the track record of science as a whole for discovering the way the universe works. But when it comes to evolution, the evidence is simply massive and overlapping and overwhelming.
The nature of science is a continual increase in knowledge, with occasional corrections, which almost always represent an increase in understanding.
Evolution doesn't legislate morality. That's not part of the theory -- if it was, evolution wouldn't be part of science. Observing that life evolves, often through ugly mechanisms like death and disease, doesn't say anything about what's right and what's wrong, anymore than germ theory says tuberculosis is a good thing.
In terms of evolution, what is wrong with it? Don't talk about love. It does not exist in evolution.
Survival of the fittest is not justification for killing. Fitness in evolution refers to ability to survive and reproduce. You don't need to actively try to kill the "weakest", those that cannot handle the rigors of life just end up dying.
You base this opinion on what exactly?
Sure not. But if you hindered my welfare (physical and spiritual), I will certainly go against you. If you are serious, then terminate you is not a bad choice. This is true to individual survivorship, and is also true to group survivorship.
That is what you get from evolution. Happy?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?