Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
None of this foolish debate will matter when the impending total economic collapse happens. Society as you know it will come to an end and billions will die in the fire. You will be killing your neighbors over canned goods and the internet will only be a useless memory in the fight for survival. I only pray the Lord will forgive us for what we will have to do to survive and procreate.
None of this foolish debate will matter when the impending total economic collapse happens. Society as you know it will come to an end and billions will die in the fire. You will be killing your neighbors over canned goods and the internet will only be a useless memory in the fight for survival. I only pray the Lord will forgive us for what we will have to do to survive and procreate.
None of this foolish debate will matter when the impending total economic collapse happens. Society as you know it will come to an end and billions will die in the fire. You will be killing your neighbors over canned goods and the internet will only be a useless memory in the fight for survival. I only pray the Lord will forgive us for what we will have to do to survive and procreate.
So in this proposed future of economic collapse, a lack of food, and violence towards neighbours just to survive, you think bringing more kids into existence under those circumstances is a good thing?
I think we can all agree this is hilarious.None of this foolish debate will matter when the impending total economic collapse happens. Society as you know it will come to an end and billions will die in the fire. You will be killing your neighbors over canned goods and the internet will only be a useless memory in the fight for survival. I only pray the Lord will forgive us for what we will have to do to survive and procreate.
I think that was more a PR battle that has shuffled nuclear to the bottom of the pile. Events like Chernobyl, rightly or wrong, are pretty big impactors on the public.The example I think of that is of very immediate concern, is the federal regulations of nuclear power use that essential killing the industry. Now we have to reconsider nuclear power as one source of alternative energy.
I guess you're a genius in figuring out what people are thinking or reading now, huh? Is that the next challenge after global warming? You are blind since day one and not know it. You shamelessly looked the other way on the faux data and the incriminating emails, that is why there's no way you can ever be convinced. You think the weather is static annually? What about in 10 years? How about 100 years? Or 1000 years? Do you think CO2 is the cause the ending of the ice age? You probably don't even know that methane is 20 times worse than CO2 and it stays in the atmosphere much, much longer before dispersing into space. But you are soooo sure CO2 is THE cause when it stays in the atmosphere for a day or two vs. 20 days for methane. It only shows you're not objective and very narrow minded. If you're so sure global warming is man-made, then you're contributing to it every single day.Note: I'm not actually making that claim. I'm using the exaggerated claim to illustrate a point....
You realize that though right?
It's a shame you didn't really read the article (which speaks to a CLEAr trend in GW). If you had, you'd realize that the scientist doesn't really say what the article title states. If the scientist (and more importantly, the journalist) wouldn't have had to pander to the readership, we could have seen something akin to scientific information being put forward.
Also, given how Brits have bellyached about snow storms in recent years, I found this quote to be disturbingly accurate:
Michael:
Interesting sentiment. Where do you still see potential holes in the ACC "story" and what kind of evidence would you need to see to be convinced?
British Broadcasting Company, commercial free due to the revenue generated from the TV Tax.
I lived in England for 2 years.
It was in relationship to Global Warming that the BBC is prejudiced.
Well, that's certainly the allegation that's been made.
Whether there's any basis to the allegation is another thing entirely.
Seems to me the BBC is just reporting the facts.
David.
Good job jsn112, tell it like it is.
Margret Thatcher pushed man caused global warming in the eighties, she threw money at it to get control over the oil companies.
So that is a man caused crisis caused by mankind that never existed. We like sheep are just traveling down the path of bad science with it all mapped out for us ,only it was all contrived by Thatcher, incredible!
That would be..."selectively" reporting the facts.
Yes, BBC was biased: Director General Mark Thompson admits a 'massive' lean to Left
BBC's bias in not only political, but that colors most of their reporting.
Three important words in that interview - "in the past". Thirty years in the past, to be precise.
So not really relevant to current reporting on Climate Change.
David.
It's very relevant.
The thirty years the Director refers to is the thirty years he's been with the BBC, a period of time, BTW, over which the global warming issue has been framed by overly zealous environmentalists and biased news organizations in apocalyptic terms.
He did indicate that the "current crop of young journalists" were different - for which we should be grateful - but BBC bias did not suddenly stop thirty years ago.
"The BBC has long been accused of being institutionally biased towards the Left, and an internal report from 2007 said it had to make greater efforts to avoid liberal bias."
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?