Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
that pretty much sums it up.
now prove it
this is an athiest thread, so prove your athiesm. I don't need to prove Christianity. It's not a christian topic!
Ha, no.
Again - the atheists here are weak atheists. Weak atheism does not involve making a claim of nonexistence.
You are claiming that god does exist. Burden of proof is on you.
I already said I was not putting any more evidence out there until you prove that God does not exist on your finger tips.
that pretty much sums it up.
now prove it
Why? That was never my claim.
Strawman fallacy.
This is getting rather pathetic.
so then prove God does not exist, your the one claiming He doesn't so the burden of proof is on you.
It was a definition involving a lack of BELIEF in the existence of gods, not about the existence of gods itself.The first statement made was regarding a definition of atheism , so I know for a fact that the burden of proof is on the athiest making the claim.
so answer it or this convo is over.
For the n-th time - I have not claimed that God does not exist. I have clarified this several times already.
It was a definition involving a lack of BELIEF in the existence of gods, not about the existence of gods itself.
I don't think there is evidence for gods, I don't think belief based on a lack of evidence is ever justifiable, ergo, I lack belief in gods. Perfectly simple, but it still eludes you.
This conversation is definitely over. You have evidently not been paying attention since the first statement.
so then prove God does not exist, your the one claiming He doesn't so the burden of proof is on you.
The first statement made was regarding a definition of atheism , so I know for a fact that the burden of proof is on the athiest making the claim.
so answer it or this convo is over.
I win, see ya.
For the sake of positive progression and common understanding in future discussions on this thread let me make a very important point.
The statement below is a fallacy.
"An Atheist is one who holds a belief in the non existence of gods"
Except for I won, by default. You do not appear to understand words and stuff.
Go me, for declaring myself the winner!
I said that there is no evidence for the non existence of God...
He said that there is no evidence for the existence of God,
I said that there is no evidence for the non existence of God...
who is correct?
Both.
No evidence neither confirms nor denies things.
exactly.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?