• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Article: IT’S NOT EVANGELICALISM ANYMORE

aog17

Active Member
Sep 23, 2017
86
84
45
West
✟32,231.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
300 years ago a movement of revival started within British and later American churches. This movement called the Church to return to the Gospel. It called the Church to share the message of Jesus with others and to follow Jesus more boldly. This movement was very diverse for its day. It affected most Christian denominations in the English-speaking world, and it touched many Christian communities. It was an international, interracial, intercultural, and interdenominational movement.

This movement promoted education, social reform, and inclusion in the Church. This movement was one of the main forces behind social justice movements for much of its history. Abolitionism, poverty-relief efforts, the Social Gospel, Labor Movement, Civil Rights Movement, and many other important causes were at least influenced by this movement.

The movement that I am talking about is Evangelicalism, but despite Evangelicalism having such a long and noble history, most don’t recognize it today – at least not in the United States. There are a number of factors that contributed to this:

First, Evangelicalism has always had a white supremacist wing. Even though Evangelicalism was indispensable in the abolitionist and civil rights movements, there was also always a segment that opposed those movements. On the one hand, you had John Wesley who argued strongly against slavery, but on the other you had Jonathan Edwards who owned slaves. There are still schisms in American churches over this exact issue. The Southern Baptist Convention is an example of an American Evangelical church founded on white supremacist principles.

Second, a movement in the early 20th century United States arose known as Fundamentalism. The original fundamentalists were orthodox theologians who were largely mainstream but opposed liberal theology. However, the second generation of the movement (and the movement today) is known for anti-intellectualism, separatism, bigotry, and literalism. This movement became extremely popular in many Christian churches and now some people will equate Evangelicalism and Fundamentalism.

Third, a movement emerged in the 1970s that closely linked Evangelicalism, Fundamentalism, and American conservative politics. One primary force behind this movement was an organization called the Moral Majority, but the movement is much bigger than one organization and is often collectively called the Religious Right. This movement was very successful. They essentially highjacked the term “evangelical” to refer to white American Protestants who were in the conservative wing of the Republican Party. They also latched onto two key issues – abortion and homosexuality. Still to this day, abortion and homosexuality seem to be the only cultural issues many American Evangelicals care about.

These three movements – white supremacy, fundamentalism, and conservatism – have all slowly chipped away at classical Evangelicalism, and they have been incredibly successful at doing so. I am a person of Evangelical background, and the church community I serve has some Evangelical background as well. However, it is nearly impossible to use the term anymore. If I say that I am an “Evangelical” in any sense, people immediate assume that I am a fundamentalist, conservative, white American Protestant.

Since the rise of the Religious Right in the 1980s, there has been a sad hypocrisy associated with the Evangelical movement in the United States. It is plain to see. Many of us know the news stories of conservative preachers or politicians losing their careers in scandals of sex, drugs, or corruption. It is something of a stereotype at this point, but it is unfortunately a very true one.

Over these past few decades we have seen American Evangelicalism distance itself more and more from historic Evangelicalism as well as the Evangel (Gospel) itself. In order to gain popularity, many preachers built media and political empires which came with fame and fortune. Many involved in politics or activism sacrificed their values to win elections. It often seems to be the case that many American Evangelicals today go as far as to endorse beliefs and practices that they consider sinful as long as it gives them more power. The endorsement of Mitt Romney in 2012 was an example of this, since Romney is a Mormon. But the endorsement of Donald Trump takes this even further. Here is a man who shows a complete disregard for God and the Bible and lives the life of a playboy, and yet he is held up as the “Christian” candidate.

What we have now is a sad Frankenstein’s monster. Right wing politics (including white supremacism at times) and fundamentalism have twisted Evangelicalism into something it was never intended to be. It reminds me of the history of European monarchs bending the Church to do their bidding, or how early 20th century fascists seduced European churches.

Instead of Evangelicalism, I think what we have now is Americanism. The three movements that chipped away at Evangelicalism all reflect a very American context. The US has a history of white supremacy, slavery, and systemic racism that still hasn’t been fully addressed. It is the US that served as the birthplace of Fundamentalism, and it is the US that gave us the contemporary Religious Right. I have come across many Evangelicals who believe that the US is uniquely blessed and inspired by God, and that our elections are supernatural battlegrounds. This has really shown itself with the 2020 presidential election as many Evangelicals are now taking it on faith that Trump has won reelection somehow.

There are also many ideological principles that American Evangelicalism has since adopted that have no basis in the Bible. The US Constitution is not in the Bible (nor in historical Evangelicalism, which was based in the United Kingdom), but yet so many will hold up the US style of government as being uniquely Christian. The Bible does not teach republicanism, capitalism, or individualism. These are all products of the Enlightenment, and many early Evangelicals (such as John Wesley) disagreed with those ideologies. In European Evangelicalism, the movement is heavily involved within Christian Democratic parties today, showing that many Evangelicals outside of the US still retain some of that perspective. But in American Evangelicalism, one does not dare challenge the American-style of government or capitalism.

Simply put, we are no longer talking about Evangelicalism in America. Over the course of decades, negative forces picked away at the Evangelical movement until almost nothing of substance was left in it. That void was then filled by America, and not the real America either. That void was filled by an American ideal. I think we all know exactly what I mean here – it is the idealistic version of America that was created during the Cold War to oppose Communists and hippies. It is the American ideal created by white conservative churches worried about the Civil Rights Movement, Equal Rights Movement, and other progressive causes. In fact, Jerry Falwell – who founded the Moral Majority – was a segregationist and opposed the Equal Rights Amendment.

We are then left with a question – what do we do about Evangelicalism? Most people involved with PCPJ are Evangelicals (or of Evangelical background). I personally love the term. But how can we possibly reclaim it? How can we restore it to what it originally meant? I am not sure, but I know that we must return to the Gospel like the founders of Evangelicalism did. Only by trying to actively and boldly follow Jesus again will any positive change be made.

It’s not Evangelicalism Anymore
 

Pioneer3mm

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 12, 2018
1,783
1,368
North America
✟723,674.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Good post.
----
Jerry Falwell Sr. & 'Moral Majority' story..in 1980's.
- The beginning of focus on..political power/establishment.
 
Last edited:
Reactions: mkgal1
Upvote 0

com7fy8

Well-Known Member
May 22, 2013
14,734
6,636
Massachusetts
✟654,459.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
They also latched onto two key issues – abortion and homosexuality. Still to this day, abortion and homosexuality seem to be the only cultural issues many American Evangelicals care about.
If parents push Christ but are not deeply satisfied and living in God's love, children can see through this and reject their parents' church copy-catting which is culture and not Christ. Then their kids in desperation can go to peers who likewise have merely a culture, where homosexuality and abortion can develop while they seek pleasure in order to satisfy themselves > in their desperation for pleasure, this can take them anywhere. So, if their parents don't like such a product, they need to change how they themselves have helped to produce it by not showing their children how to love in marriage.

Personal example is needed; changing laws can not make people find out how to love in a close relationship. And God's word has plenty to help us become His examples.

The US Constitution is not in the Bible (nor in historical Evangelicalism, which was based in the United Kingdom), but yet so many will hold up the US style of government as being uniquely Christian.
Jesus appointed people with authority to rule His people. Plus, they ruled by means of unanimous agreement, in which Peter trusted the people to choose deacons (Acts 6), and the whole church came to agreement before they were able to settle the issue of if Gentiles must follow the Law of Moses (Acts 15). There were rulers and unanimous agreement . . . among those who obeyed God in His grace, I would say. And I would not trust or expect less.

But we have many cultural human things which call attention elsewhere and make it look as though this is not possible. But right now God is succeeding in all His word means to Him > Isaiah 55:11 > "Therefore submit to God." (in James 4:7)

Simply put, we are no longer talking about Evangelicalism in America.
I tell people that "evangelical" rightfully means preaching the death and burial and resurrection of Jesus on the third day, and trusting in Him and all He did on the cross, for salvation, and discovering how God changes us to submit to Him and share with Him in His love while He corrects us so we are loving each and every person the way He has us loving creatively while sharing and caring with one another as His family. And indeed, this needs how our Father is able to correct us and change us to become and love like His Son Jesus; and God's focus is to conform us to the image of Jesus (Romans 8:29, Colossians 1:28-29, Ephesians 4:15). And the Bible helps us with this while we feed on the example of leaders and others who love like this while becoming more and more maturely like Christ.

So, Biblical evangelicalism is about how God is able, not how we humanly have been trying and crying and frying while denying.

Over the course of decades, negative forces picked away at the Evangelical movement until almost nothing of substance was left in it. That void was then filled by America, and not the real America either.
The one nation of God is God's "holy nation" (1 Peter 2:9) in Jesus, and we include brothers and sisters all around the earth and in eternity. Many people in the United Sates, by the way, are divided in a national fifty-fifty divorce and political civil war. How many are united in God's way of loving, I do not know. But we win by example, by prayer and obeying God; this helps the most, I now understand > yes, I myself can analyze and criticize and congratulate myself on how insightful I am, but this does not work, either > only God is able to change us to all which is better than what people can seek with politics and controlling people.

I see that God's basic for bringing Biblical change is how His word says for leaders to lead >

"nor as being lords over those entrusted to you, but being examples to the flock." (1 Peter 5:3)

A Biblical leader takes the lead in what everyone needs to feed on. And we need to personally know an example so we can see how the person lives in submission to God and shares in close relationships of marriage and friendship. And the children of such example will know which way to go.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

mkgal1

His perfect way sets me free. 2 Samuel 22:33
Site Supporter
Jun 22, 2007
27,338
7,348
California
✟573,733.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Last edited:
Upvote 0

com7fy8

Well-Known Member
May 22, 2013
14,734
6,636
Massachusetts
✟654,459.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Many people in the United Sates, by the way, are divided in a national fifty-fifty divorce and political civil war.
This, I now think, is because so many couples have not related the way God's word says to relate > including >

"Do all things without complaining and disputing," (Philippians 2:14)

Children of fussing and fighting parents grow up not knowing how to relate in love. And then they can go anywhere, as we are seeing. And the lost politicians are just the tip of the iceberg of this problem.

So, the solution needs to be home, not in law courts. Law can help make an issue, though, but home example feeds children how to love in marriage and other close relating.

And isolating in dating does not do this.

We need to grow and develop in family caring and sharing with various other Christian people, including ones much more mature than we are . . . not merely trying to find someone like ourselves so we can isolate and inbreed with each other and get pleasure we want. Preference for pleasure is a real problem, and wrong sexual preferences could, then, be another tip of the iceberg of preference for pleasure more than for God and being all-loving.
 
Upvote 0

Minister Monardo

Well-Known Member
Mar 9, 2020
8,725
3,541
69
Arizona
✟204,233.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Celibate
These three movements – white supremacy, fundamentalism, and conservatism – have all slowly chipped away at classical Evangelicalism, and they have been incredibly successful at doing so.
2 Corinthians 2:11 lest Satan should take advantage of us; for we are not ignorant of his devices.

Luke 22:
31
And the Lord said, Simon, Simon, behold, Satan hath desired to have you, that he may
sift you as wheat:
32 But I have prayed for thee, that thy faith fail not: and when thou art converted, strengthen
thy brethren.


Romans 11:5 Even so then, at this present time there is a remnant according to the election of grace.

Revelation 12:17 And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.
 
Upvote 0