- Feb 4, 2006
- 46,773
- 10,976
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Protestant
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Others
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
And what science do you disagree with? A specific example please.
Scientific observations are constantly being reinterpreted.
Scientific observations are constantly being refined, to accommodate new or better evidence and improve accuracy.
This is a feature, not a drawback.
Why?
I don't get updates from my high school about knowledge that has changed, so I'm locked in a time warp.(Oh wait, they closed my old high school.)
All they have presented is the hardware. I want to see the OS and the software.
ToE is not very specific, not to mention off topic for this thread. Perhaps you could weave your ToE suggestion into deep time?The ToE.
So, you're upset about your failure to stay abreast of scientific progress?
What an odd statement.
Scientific 'observations' are loaded with speculations 'explaining' the 'meaning' of what they've discovered, and is apt to change at a moments notice. But that's ok as much of it is just entertainment anyway.
Scientific observations are constantly being reinterpreted.
Why shouldn't they be? Isn't that what open minded and honest scientists should do, keep reinterpreting the data as new data comes in?
What?????Very few people can keep up with it. Science is like a wagon train heading west. The lead wagons are in California already but many stragglers were lost along the way (and some never made it out of St. Louis).
Very few people can keep up with it. Science is like a wagon train heading west. The lead wagons are in California already but many stragglers were lost along the way (and some never made it out of St. Louis).
Why should scientific knowledge slow itself so that those who reject science can keep up with it?
Few, including myself, reject science, but some reject the ToE.
If you reject the ToE, then you reject science.
But the rejection of ToE is based on belief, rather than any science that contradicts it, right?So it's "love me, love my dog" is it?
When you reject a scientific theory because it conflicts with your religious beliefs, you are rejecting the very purpose of doing science.So it's "love me, love my dog" is it?
But the rejection of ToE is based on belief, rather than any science that contradicts it, right?
When you reject a scientific theory because it conflicts with your religious beliefs, you are rejecting the very purpose of doing science.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?