- Dec 20, 2009
- 30,223
- 8,526
- Country
- Canada
- Faith
- Christian Seeker
- Marital Status
- Married
We're not muslims, so restrictions regarding that aren't a thing.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
We're not muslims, so restrictions regarding that aren't a thing.You see it often and regularly. Christians who either have an image of Jesus hanging on their wall at home or have a picture of Jesus as their profile picture on social media. There are also Christians who bow down before an image of Jesus (or Mary).
My question is: Is that reprehensible to make an image of God?
Paul said in Acts 17:29: "Because we are descended from God, it is absurd to think that we can represent God in statues made of gold, silver or hewn stones. These are, after all, only creations of our art and our imaginations."
Isn't that a clear statement?
My other question is: Why do people always tend to make an image of God? We see this already in the early times of mankind and until today it is still common. How do you explain this phenomenon?
Yup, you got them all. Both the middle (Christ) and right (HS) angels are facing the left one (Father), reminiscent of the Orthodox version of the Nicene Creed. The Son is begotten of the Father and the Spirit is begotten of the Father (and not "The Father and the Son"). The house on the left is indicative of Abraham's house. The tree in the background is the Oak of Mamre, but also a reflection of the Tree of life. The mountain is one of spiritual ascent, as in Orthodox theology, we climb with the aid of the Holy Spirit.If I look at that with my eyes crossed there's definitely a circle defined by the bodies. I also see a cup framed by the two outside figures that becomes almost three-dimensional when viewed the same way. The oak in the background suggests that this is the encounter at Mamre; the wings (which I almost missed) do as well since the "three men" who visited Abraham at Mamre have traditionally been understood to have been angels.. The faces seem identical (I'd want a much larger image to be certain, but I'd bet that they are), which makes this a suggestion of the Trinity. The center figure would be Christ since he is inside the framed cup. I'm guessing the figure on the right would then suggest the Holy Spirit, since blue and green indicate life and He is the Lord and Giver of life. That would leave the figure on the left as the suggestion of the Father (though there must be something else I'm missing that tells this is the Father). I can't tell what's in the cup on the table, so no guess at any meaning.
The item in the right background looks to me like a tsunami wave; I suppose it must be a mountain?
Yup, you got them all. Both the middle (Christ) and right (HS) angels are facing the left one (Father), reminiscent of the Orthodox version of the Nicene Creed. The Son is begotten of the Father and the Spirit is begotten of the Father (and not "The Father and the Son"). The house on the left is indicative of Abraham's house. The tree in the background is the Oak of Mamre, but also a reflection of the Tree of life. The mountain is one of spiritual ascent, as in Orthodox theology, we climb with the aid of the Holy Spirit.
Yup, my mistake. Brain no workee on a Saturday at 6:35amOuch! The Spirit is not begotten, but proceeds.
So what's in the cup on the table
Yeah, I remember posting on one forum almost compulsively until about 4 a.m. once; when I two days later re-read what I'd written I had to do a lot of re-writes.Yup, my mistake. Brain no workee on a Saturday at 6:35amAnd trying to answer this at 5:17am on a Monday is even worse
The head? That's . . . weird.The bowl in the center contains the head of a calf from Gen 18
That's a purely subjective opinion. It's not based on any commandment from God. The commandment God gave in Exodus 20 is quite clearly laid out, that we are not to make idols of gods to replace him. Like when the Isealites made a golden calf god (probably a representation of Baal) to replace YHWH while Moses was away. It's alright that you don't like pictures of Jesus, but you can't claim God doesn't like pictures of Jesus, without quoting Him saying so. Unless you're claiming to be a prophet God is speaking through, you need scripture to back up what you're saying. Otherwise is just your (and John Calvin's) personal pet peeve.It is self-evident that it is forbidden to paint God a face. Go to a Reformed church, a Syanagoge or a mosque, you will not find an image of God, because these people fear God. Only catholic-minded Christians see it differently.
It is a question of Godliness not to do it. Why do you desire to make images of God? Why do you want to do it so badly? You can make pictures of anything else, isn't that enough for you?
So it is recognisible as the fatted calf Abraham prepared for them. You might not recognise a lump of meat as a lump of meat in an icon. In a sense it is a visual example of synecdocheThe head? That's . . . weird.
Yeah, I remember posting on one forum almost compulsively until about 4 a.m. once; when I two days later re-read what I'd written I had to do a lot of re-writes.
The head? That's . . . weird.
Context, for those wanting to argue:"God has forbidden two things [ cf. Exodus 20:4-5]. First, the making of any picture of Him…. The other is, that no image may be worshipped…." - John Calvin.
"4 Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth.
5 Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the Lord thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me;" Exodus 20:4-5
It seems pretty clear that God isn't limiting this to images of Him, but rather is saying not to make images of anything that exists... to worship in place of Him.
You see it often and regularly. Christians who either have an image of Jesus hanging on their wall at home or have a picture of Jesus as their profile picture on social media. There are also Christians who bow down before an image of Jesus (or Mary).
My question is: Is that reprehensible to make an image of God?
Paul said in Acts 17:29: "Because we are descended from God, it is absurd to think that we can represent God in statues made of gold, silver or hewn stones. These are, after all, only creations of our art and our imaginations."
Isn't that a clear statement?
My other question is: Why do people always tend to make an image of God? We see this already in the early times of mankind and until today it is still common. How do you explain this phenomenon?
One of the earliest depictions of Jesus, dated 235AD
View attachment 324484
The synagogue unearthed at Dura Europos was filled with images depicting scenes from the Old Testament. They did not have images of God because God had never been seen. Since the incarnation, God has been seen.So, when we got the image of the long haired Jesus we have now? It was developed at a time when pagans were being converted and coming into the church. In their enthusiasm for their new found faith some of their artists wanted to depict Jesus in paintings and pictures.
Where are some of these pagan images of "holy men" that it is claimed images of Jesus were based on? I can understand different ethnicities depicting Jesus with the same ethnic features, but the above claim sounds like pure conjecture.What was their frame of reference for how Jesus should look? The curator said that they depicted Jesus according to their own concepts of what constituted a holy man from their pagan temples they had come out of. Which unfortunately, were often times in appearance like we now get pictures of Jesus.
The word translated as "long hair" literally means "hairdo". The Nazerenes who vowed never to cut their hair were not considered a disgrace. Samson was not considered a disgrace and John the Baptist was not considered a disgrace. It was considered a disgrace if they were styling their hair like a woman would do."Does not the very nature of things teach you that
if a man has long hair, it is a disgrace to him?"
1 Cor 11:14
You have details on the construction of the tables which had been set up in the outer court?When he cleared the Temple? To turn over those heavy wooden tables in the Temple? Tables which were holding hundreds of pounds of coins? Besides the heavy wooden table being heavy in itself! To flip over the tables of the money changers? That took exceptional physical power! He was not some long haired religious mystic type.
Is that the best you can try?You have details on the construction of the tables which had been set up in the outer court?
You have documentation of what weight of coins would have been on those tables?
It sounds to me that you have created in your mind your own image of Jesus.
So you offer no archaeological evidence, just your opinion that the tables must have been massive, heavy timber construction and there would have been hundreds of pounds in weight of coins on them, because 'reasons'.Is that the best you can try?
So you offer no archaeological evidence, just your opinion that the tables must have been massive, heavy timber construction and there would have been hundreds of pounds in weight of coins on them, because 'reasons'.
Have you got a reference for that? In ancient Greek it comes from the verb κομάω, "I have long hair".The word translated as "long hair" literally means "hairdo". The Nazerenes who vowed never to cut their hair were not considered a disgrace. Samson was not considered a disgrace and John the Baptist was not considered a disgrace. It was considered a disgrace if they were styling their hair like a woman would do.
You made a set of claims. You were challenged to provide sources. Your response here is strange; common sense would be to at least provide some information!Is that the best you can try?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?