Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
My brother I agree with your statement but it does not respond to my post. I’ll give you a hint: apostolic succession according to the RCC.The ways of God are far above our ways.
John 6:44no God wills all men everywhere to repent. The elect are those that will repent. God does not force them to repent.
Yes God draws them, He does not handcuff, hoodwink, or kidnap themJohn 6:44
No one can come to Me unless the Father who sent Me draws him; and I will raise him up on the last day.
Ephesians 2:8
For by grace you have been saved through faith; and this is not of yourselves, it is the gift of God;
You need to give me time. So as not to miscommunicate, can you tell me your point in quoting that portion of the Catechism?Again, assuming facts not in evidence.
My brother, you go where the Lord takes you and I will go where the Lord takes me. Talking RCC speak is not going to change my mind.
No church is invisible in the eyes of the Lord. Where 3 are gathered in my name there I am. You need to trust the Holy Spirit in which, as Christians, we walk in.
BTW- you are still to respond to my post 220 and to the post with the cathechism quotes that you requested and then quickly ignored.
Because it adds works for salvation. 1129 adds sacraments as a requirement for salvation which is not biblical. 2010 states that we can gather merits by ourselves during sanctification for the attainment of salvation. Meaning that we work for salvation not from salvation. 2027 is similar to 2010 but only states that we can gather merits for our own salvation which takes salvation to a merit salvation. 2068 related to the canons of Trent which requires baptism and the Ten Commandments in order to attain salvation. This is faith plus works salvation.You need to give me time. So as not to miscommunicate, can you tell me your point in quoting that portion of the Catechism?
I can show you the scriptures, but the sacraments were commanded by Jesus, so to deny them would be to rebel against Jesus commandsBecause it adds works for salvation. 1129 adds sacraments as a requirement for salvation which is not biblical. 2010 states that we can gather merits by ourselves during sanctification for the attainment of salvation. Meaning that we work for salvation not from salvation. 2027 is similar to 2010 but only states that we can gather merits for our own salvation which takes salvation to a merit salvation. 2068 related to the canons of Trent which requires baptism and the Ten Commandments in order to attain salvation. This is faith plus works salvation.
You have great theological drama in your responses. I don’t see John 3:16 adding anything to salvation beyond faith so anything else is done FROM salvation. See no drama. No one is rebelling.I can show you the scriptures, but the sacraments were commanded by Jesus, so to deny them would be to rebel against Jesus commands
More drama. No one is rebelling against the Ten Commandments because again we keep them FROM salvation. We keep them because of our love of Jesus and this love can only come from justification and regeneration. We cannot love Jesus in our fallen state.Jesus says if you love me, keep my commandments. To rebel against them then would be to not love Jesus. Are you saying that those that are saved do not love Jesus?
Because the catechism asserts that you need to do the above TO attain salvation. Once again we have the Lord’s supper and baptize new believers FROM salvation. In fact, we only baptize those that have professed their faith in Jesus Christ as it shows in scripture.I mean Jesus said unless you eat my flesh and drink my blood, you have no life in you. Also He commanded the Apostles to go into all the world and baptize them in the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit, teaching them to obey all that I have commanded you. How does the catechism contradict these scriptures?
John 6:53 So Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink his blood, you have no life in you; RSVCEBecause the catechism asserts that you need to do the above TO attain salvation. Once again we have the Lord’s supper and baptize new believers FROM salvation. In fact, we only baptize those that have professed their faith in Jesus Christ as it shows in scripture.
And that’s what happens when you use verses out of context.John 6:53 So Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink his blood, you have no life in you; RSVCE
Again, how can one claim to love Jesus and not desire to keep His commandments? The Ten Commandments are Old Covenant. Jesus expanded on the Ten Commandments in Matthew 5-7, and He gave additional commandments which are demonstrated in the sacraments.You have great theological drama in your responses. I don’t see John 3:16 adding anything to salvation beyond faith so anything else is done FROM salvation. See no drama. No one is rebelling.
More drama. No one is rebelling against the Ten Commandments because again we keep them FROM salvation. We keep them because of our love of Jesus and this love can only come from justification and regeneration. We cannot love Jesus in our fallen state.
Because the catechism asserts that you need to do the above TO attain salvation. Once again we have the Lord’s supper and baptize new believers FROM salvation. In fact, we only baptize those that have professed their faith in Jesus Christ as it shows in scripture.
I can show you the scriptures, but the sacraments were commanded by Jesus, so to deny them would be to rebel against Jesus commands
Again, that is not what anyone here is claiming. The difference is than your church teaches that a person needs to keep the commandments FOR salvation while we keep the commandments FROM salvation as the Holt Scriptures teach. Your church teaches a faith plus works salvation.Again, how can one claim to love Jesus and not desire to keep His commandments?
"Transubstantiation" is a word for what Jesus tells us in John. When Jews doubted that they were to eat His true flesh, Jesus became more emphatic. The Greek changes to a word meaning to "masticate," to actually chew, physical eating. It was such a "hard saying" for the disciples of Jesus that many actually walked away. Jesus did not call them back and say "Wait, I was only speaking symbolically." Jesus linked this new sacrament to the Passover. In order to complete the Passover meal the Jews had to physically eat the lamb. Had they disobeyed God's orders to eat the lamb at the Passover they would not have been saved.And that’s what happens when you use verses out of context.
Audience: Jews
Reason for passage: comparing the manna that the descendants of the Jews ate in the desert to Jesus deity. Jesus begins his discourse announcing that He is the bread of life. Right before the verse that you cited Jesus states:
“So then the Jews were complaining about Him because He said, “I am the bread that came down out of heaven.” And they were saying, “Is this not Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know? How does He now say, ‘I have come down out of heaven’?” Jesus answered and said to them, “Stop complaining among yourselves. No one can come to Me unless the Father who sent Me draws him; and I will raise him up on the last day. It is written in the Prophets: ‘And they shall all be taught of God.’ Everyone who has heard and learned from the Father, comes to Me. Not that anyone has seen the Father, except the One who is from God; He has seen the Father. Truly, truly, I say to you, the one who believes has eternal life.”
John 6:41-47 NASB2020
Here He states what is actually needed for salvation.John 6:41-47 So then the Jews were complaining about Him because He said, “I am the bread that came down out of heaven.” And they were saying, “Is this not Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know | New American Standard Bible - NASB
So then the Jews were complaining about Him because He said, “I am the bread that came down out of heaven.” And they were saying, “Is this not Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we knowbible.com
“I am the bread of life. Your fathers ate the manna in the wilderness, and they died. This is the bread that comes down out of heaven, so that anyone may eat from it and not die. I am the living bread that came down out of heaven; if anyone eats from this bread, he will live forever; and the bread which I will give for the life of the world also is My flesh.” Then the Jews began to argue with one another, saying, “How can this Man give us His flesh to eat?” So Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink His blood, you have no life in yourselves. The one who eats My flesh and drinks My blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up on the last day. For My flesh is true food, and My blood is true drink. The one who eats My flesh and drinks My blood remains in Me, and I in him. Just as the living Father sent Me, and I live because of the Father, the one who eats Me, he also will live because of Me. This is the bread that came down out of heaven, not as the fathers ate and died; the one who eats this bread will live forever.””
John 6:48-58 NASB2020
John 6:51-58 I am the living bread that came down out of heaven; if anyone eats from this bread, he will live forever; and the bread which I will give for the life of the world also is My flesh.” Then the Jews beg | New American Standard Bible - NASB
I am the living bread that came down out of heaven; if anyone eats from this bread, he will live forever; and the bread which I will give for the life of the world also is My flesh.” Then the Jews begbible.com
Here Jesus is telling the unbelieving Jews that they must believe in Him to have salvation. The Christians were accused of performing cannibalistic rituals because if Jesus words and many of His audience did not believe His words.
But whether you read the passage right or not the fact still remains that I continue to state that we do the Lords Supper FROM salvation for FOR salvation as verse 47 do eloquently proclaims.
BTW, transubstantiation is an invention of the council of Trent. The elements do not turn into the flesh and blood of Christ.
Jesus breathed on the Apostles and gave them the power to forgive sin, so there is confession or Penance. He validated marriage as binding, so there is matrimony. He said John baptized with water, but He would baptize with the Holy Spirit and with fire, so there is baptism in rhe Holy Spirit which is confirmation.In my church's tradition, there's a separation of the sacraments into two groups: dominical sacraments, which were directly instituted by Jesus himself; and church sacraments (also called ecclesiastical sacraments or sacramental rites), which developed later in the life of the church. Baptism and the Eucharist are in the first category, and the other five are in the latter category.
I thought that Catholic theology made the same distinction. Am I mistaken?
Your church stands alone in this belief. Jesus defined a simile for the rest of us."Transubstantiation" is a word for what Jesus tells us in John. When Jews doubted that they were to eat His true flesh, Jesus became more emphatic. The Greek changes to a word meaning to "masticate," to actually chew, physical eating. It was such a "hard saying" for the disciples of Jesus that many actually walked away. Jesus did not call them back and say "Wait, I was only speaking symbolically." Jesus linked this new sacrament to the Passover. In order to complete the Passover meal the Jews had to physically eat the lamb. Had they disobeyed God's orders to eat the lamb at the Passover they would not have been saved.
The Greek Orthodox also believe the literal words of Jesus. The three leaders of the reformation all came up with their own different ideas on the Eucharist and I don't know how may are ideas out there today. This was not new, first with the disciples described in John, who had been with Jesus up until that point. It was also so decades later:Your church stands alone in this belief. Jesus defined a simile for the rest of us.
The Greek Orthodox also believe the words of Jesus.
Ignatius is not pitching transubstantiation. Start with Thomas Aquinas but Trent finalized it. As a counterreformation council that only applied to the RCC the impetus was to separate the RCC from everyone else. Mistakes were made.The three leaders of the reformation all came up with their own different ideas on the Eucharist and I don't know how may are out there today. This was not new, first with the disciples described in John, who had been with Jesus up until that point. It was also so decades later:
Ignatius of Antioch:
“I have no taste for corruptible food nor for the pleasures of this life. I desire the bread of God, which is the flesh of Jesus Christ, who was of the seed of David; and for drink I desire his blood, which is love incorruptible” (Letter to the Romans 7:3 [A.D. 110]).
“Take note of those who hold heterodox opinions on the grace of Jesus Christ which has come to us, and see how contrary their opinions are to the mind of God. . . . They abstain from the Eucharist and from prayer because they do not confess that the Eucharist is the flesh of our Savior Jesus Christ, flesh which suffered for our sins and which that Father, in his goodness, raised up again. They who deny the gift of God are perishing in their disputes” (Letter to the Smyrnaeans 6:2–7:1 [A.D. 110]).
No you are misconstruing Church doctrine.Again, that is not what anyone here is claiming. The difference is than your church teaches that a person needs to keep the commandments FOR salvation while we keep the commandments FROM salvation as the Holt Scriptures teach. Your church teaches a faith plus works salvation.
You are starting from the wrong premise, hence theological drama.
And yet I posted the evidence from the CCC that you still have not addressed.No you are misconstruing Church doctrine.
Then you work FOR salvation not FROM salvation. No one here is saying that the believers with saving faith refuse to do works or keep the Ten Commandments.Please review the Canons on justification from the Council of Trent. Man is fully dependent on the grace of God for justification and does no work to bring it about.
The Church teaches works from justification as you say that you do. What the catechism teaches is that it is impossible to claim salvation and refuse to work.
Again, you are starting with the wrong premise. This is more theological drama. All Christians, including you, still sin otherwise no one would ever need to repent. Second, all Christians with saving faith pray and deny themselves. All Christians who have saving faith will do works but not for salvation but from salvation. We do the works that God prepared in advance for us to do because we are made a workmanship for Christ (Eph. 2). No one is made a workmanship for Christ unless they have been born again and justified. We will join the marriage supper of the Lamb.There is no such thing as a Christian who does not pray and does not deny himself, and does not repent of sin. Those that are justified and claim salvation yet continue to sin make a mockery of God.
The teaching on justification is simple. One who is justified will do the works lovingly and willingly.
If one refuses to work and rather enter in under presumption, he should have no hope of joining the marriage supper of the Lamb. As Jesus teaches that we cannot enter in without a wedding garment, though some will try, and Jesus said they will be bound hand a foot and cast into outer darkness.
Yes God draws them, He does not handcuff, hoodwink, or kidnap them
I know it is not of myself as the natural man has no instinct to chose God. Our natural state wishes to make a god of ourselves. That is the temptation between which our will chooses.
Take pride and claim we know enough of God ourselves and brag we can never lose Him, or humble ourselves, take up our cross and say not my will but thine be done, let it be done to me according to your words.
If we claim mental ascent of Jesus is all that is needed, it goes against Jesus own instruction when He says you will seek me and find me when you search with all your heart. If we say we have already found Him, how does that spur us to keep searching? That kind of preaching leads to spiritual sloth and the attitude of the Laodiceans which God warned us about
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?