Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
OK, you're confused. My sympathies.I'm pro-evolution, I embrace evolution. That said, I'm anti-evolution, I reject evolution.
What "two"?EXACTLY! So if evolutionists can't separate the two, then we are against and for it. That is a logical stance.
I wasn't attacking your character. I was referring to your "debating" style. That is again evident in the post you just made. Let's examine just one part of your post as an example.further attacks on my character like this will not be tolerated ecco.
the links i presented support the following:
4. there is no evidence at all that life arose naturally from a "pond of goo".
Microevolution and macroevolution. I am pro microevolution and accept it, but against macroevolution and reject it.
The evolutionary model is founded on the assumption of slow and gradual change over millions of years.
Darwinism assumes that biological change is virtually unlimited—that, given enough time, bunnies can become belugas, and penguins can become people.
Microevolution and macroevolution. I am pro microevolution and accept it, but against macroevolution and reject it.
OK, you're confused. My sympathies.
Let's try a little word substitution and see how it works...
- I'm pro-Intelligent Design, I embrace Intelligent Design. That said, I'm anti-Intelligent Design, I reject Intelligent Design.
- I'm pro-Creationism, I embrace Creationism. That said, I'm anti-Creationism, I reject Creationism.
- I'm pro-God, I embrace God. That said, I'm anti-God, I reject God.
Your logic is impeccable.
No, they are not. Evolutionists extrapolate micro to be the same thing, but there is NO evidence of crossing kinds anywhere and the evidence of it should be everywhere, if it was there.
What's a kind?
Since evolution isn't a monolithic term, I can be pro-evolution and anti-evolution.
May I jump in here and say that bacteria producing bacteria ain't the same thing as a life blob (unknown) producing hickory nuts and elephants?
As I have said before, YOU do not get to make up definitions to suit your own beliefs.
You certainly can say that. Thank for supporting evolution. I'm quite certain that all people who support evolution would agree with your statement. I know I do.
I've pointed out the differences to you more than once.....it has to do with the how/process and the scientific method. Simply because you refuse the facts doesn't make the truth disappear.
my position is, we have no evidence it did.Let's look at the issue of life arising in a pond of goo. Your words "no evidence" suggest that your position is that life did not arise from a pond of goo.
i will save you the trouble:To support your position, you state you have presented links that support your position. But, at this point in the thread, you have posted many links. Do you expect me, or anyone else, to search back through the thread looking for "goo"?
my position is that the truth about evolution should be spelled out to our students.And is it really your position that life did not arise from a pond of goo? It is difficult to decipher what point you are trying to make, since you often make unresponsive or contradictory statements about your position.
that's exactly right, i certainly do not believe in the validity of the modern synthesis.And then you don't even remember what you said.
ecco post # 328
I asked:
How do you explain the presence of humans on earth?
What evidence do you have for that position?
Your own thoughts, words, beliefs, ideas, theories, concepts.
whois post # 330
i get asked this question a lot.whois post # 374
i don't have any real belief one way or another.
actually i said i don't know where i stand in regards to evolution.
some scientists already have written papers on this topic.Are you willing to write a paper on this subject and submit it to a reputable scientific publication?
Yes, I believe in God and Genesis, however macroevolution does not follow the laws of sciences. It does not follow the Law of Cause and Effect, The Second Law of Thermodynamics nor probabilities. In essence it should be thrown out. But because it is heralded by some as the best thing since apple pie it has not been.
- You are pro microevolution because you can use it to explain how two of the "kind" felines became lions and tigers and [bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse] cats as dictated by your beliefs in genesis.
- You are anti macroevolution because it contradicts your belief in genesis.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?