- Aug 11, 2017
- 25,838
- 8,372
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
Oh like Christ’s resurrection? So you can’t believe in that either?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Because they are demonstrably wrong.
In fact modern creationists are afraid to state their beliefs clearly because they are so easier to shown to be wrong.
Only in the Bible.Not being accepted does not mean that the account isn’t true. Moses was obviously an eyewitness to the Exodus events.
Why? Let's not get into other beliefs here. This is not the place to debate other parts of the Bible.
This is the wrong place for that discussion.Oh like Christ’s resurrection? So you can’t believe in that either?
I would like to discuss thus. But I don't want to get this thread closed down.No if we can’t believe something because science says it’s impossible then let’s by all means explore the full implications of that statement.
Of course.Only in the Bible.
This is the wrong place for that discussion.
So perhaps that could be discussed in the apologetics forum.Of course.
Since there are countless Christians that accept evolution, probably the majority when one looks worldwide it appears that they are not.I think it’s the perfect place because the two are entangled.
This is the wrong place for that discussion.
This is a non-sequitur.
Where other people came from is a huge problem with the Garden of Eden story. It might be better not to take it literally at all. It still works as a morality tale.In general, it seems the main difference between humans and animals is that God gave us this nature so we continued to grow in a direction that is distinctive of humans.
The teachings passed down that seem restrictive and annoying to be told appear to be an attempt to avoid regression back to beasts.
In the garden there were two humans. One was taken from outside the garden, and God breathed life into clay, and then divided the genders making two though they were still one in another sense in the beginning.
Since the first two humans only had sons, then it would stand to reason they might have had children with evolved beings that looked similar that came from beasts.
So this is why it is a struggle to "be human" since there's so much animal in us.
Just a thought I had, thanks for the inspiration, maybe someone will make it into a book.
I wouldn’t call a hand full of bones numerous. All they have are a few unconfirmed theories based on assumptions.
Misinterpreting the Bible, at best, does not help you.Just keep in mind friend that the Lord said that the wisdom of the world is foolishness to God and vice versa.
It seems a lot of the "textbook evolution" taught in schools is outdated already - but the debate is against this strawman theory that no one really believes in anymore.
That's what it looks like anyway.
Since there are countless Christians that accept evolution, probably the majority when one looks worldwide it appears that they are not.
I don’t see why. Moses talks of creation, and this is the Creation & Evolution forum.So perhaps that could be discussed in the apologetics forum.
intelligent design is not typically the only evidence Christians have. It’s typically also supported by life experiences and documentation of eyewitness testimonies dating back to 3,500 years ago.
Oh my goodness! The 'dead guy' argument. Logically faulty and based on an Arianist christology. I thought creationists had given that one up finally.Well I surely hope that the scientists can figure out how to resurrect a body after it’s been dead for three days for your sake my friend. I’d hate to think that you can’t believe in Christ’s resurrection because scientists say it’s impossible.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?