Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
No, you clearly get excited by being degrading to people. Perhaps if you dialed back the ego about 20 clicks, things would seem different.
Epiphany, Alfred is your Smiley.Are you consol ?
Yall should ask yourselves why this was what evolution used to teach before it was apparently debunked. Why does evolution always shift the goalposts when Christians and skeptics of evolution prove what they say as wrong as the theory becomes more refined. It's like they refine the theory of evolution only in order to make it more believable. The truth doesn't need that treatment.
You legit say what I said is wrong, then proceed to say what I was trying to say, haha. I think some folks just get excitable by the idea of winning an argument. And that is not what I sound like.
You legit say what I said is wrong, then proceed to say what I was trying to say, haha. I think some folks just get excitable by the idea of winning an argument. And that is not what I sound like.
I agree that one can be saved and believe that God was that starter of evolution/big bang. I do not hold to that, though. Out of all the branches of science I've studied, there are several that take note as having a lot of false info propagated within them, there is a lot of false information in this world held on a pedestal. Once you see how certain branches of science misinterpret the data either on purpose or accidentally [via steps they follow as part of the process] you start becoming skeptical of the infallibility of modern day, agenda and money-driven science.
For example, climate alarmism is probably the very most obvious example [or perhaps the pharmaceutical industry studies] that show just because something that was peer reviewed comes out, doesn't mean it is accurate at all. When scientists find results contradictory to the agenda at hand given by the funders of most of the research projects, they find themseves without a job, blackballed. There are many folks with degrees in said field who explain their field is like a club, and if you're the odd man out, good luck finding work in that field. How many other branches of science could that be happening in?
In fact there are data for the number of days in a year 900 million years ago. Analysis of rhythmic sedimentary rocks that have preserved evidence for the tides implies that at this time there were between 481 and 486 days in the year.Furthermore, in biblical times a year was 360 days - today it is 365 days - we have no data as to how many days a year was a billion years ago. The data simply is not available.
Thanks for that.In fact there are data for the number of days in a year 900 million years ago. Analysis of rhythmic sedimentary rocks that have preserved evidence for the tides implies that at this time there were between 481 and 486 days in the year.
There's a number of different ways thatIn fact there are data for the number of days in a year 900 million years ago. Analysis of rhythmic sedimentary rocks that have preserved evidence for the tides implies that at this time there were between 481 and 486 days in the year.
There's a number of different ways that
days per year at different earth ages is
determined.
There's no way it was 360 days in biblical
times.
People who just make things up and
state them as fact do themselves no credit.
The primary objection to evolution from creationists seems to be centered on human evolution specifically. For some reason the fact of sharing hereditary ancestry with other species causes creationists no end of grief.
However, if we didn't share ancestry with other species, why are we made of all the same 'stuff' as other animals? Especially in regards to our closest relatives (other primates), we share the same body plan, organs, cell structure, majority of our genetic makeup and so on.
If it was really important that we be distinct from other animal species, why didn't God make us wholly unique? Why not give us a completely unique physical makeup and genetic structure?
Evolution at least can explain this via genetic inheritance. Independent creation... not so much.
And before you say, "God just reused common parts":
a) Why would God reuse common parts in a manner that is perfectly consistent with genetic inheritance and biological evolution?
b) Why would it matter if we consider ourselves physically "related" to animals if we're all made from the same stuff to begin with?
Nor is nuclear physics.I’m not sure what creation supporters you engage with, but my primary objection is that evolutionism isn’t supported by scripture.
Dug deep for that one.Nor is nuclear physics.
Dug deep for that one.
Where does scripture discuss physics?
Okay.Nowhere, which is why I don't read them.
Wow...going back a bit for this one.I’m not sure what creation supporters you engage with, but my primary objection is that evolutionism isn’t supported by scripture.
my primary objection is that evolutionism isn’t supported by scripture.
Wow...going back a bit for this one.
My primary objections with scripture is that when it comes to creation they do not support what God's own Creation, created by His own hands and signed off with His signature has shown us.
This evolutionism isn't an actual thing ...
The dictionary and standard methods of creating neologisms can take a hike, can't they?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?