• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
Status
Not open for further replies.

toolmanjantzi

Veteran
Site Supporter
Feb 1, 2013
2,505
28
Sundridge, Ontario
✟72,222.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
Subduction Zone said:
You mean gravity? Or electromagnetism?

I don't think either of the two nuclear forces could be said to be responsible.

Well the strong nuclear force is responsible for sunlight. So I guess you may be correct there.

Have you seen either?
 
Upvote 0

toolmanjantzi

Veteran
Site Supporter
Feb 1, 2013
2,505
28
Sundridge, Ontario
✟72,222.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
Subduction Zone said:
You mean gravity? Or electromagnetism?

I don't think either of the two nuclear forces could be said to be responsible.

Well the strong nuclear force is responsible for sunlight. So I guess you may be correct there.


Web definitions
Empirical research is research that derives its data by means of direct observation or experiment, such research is used to answer.......

Have you observed either forces?
 
Upvote 0

Subduction Zone

Regular Member
Dec 17, 2012
32,629
12,069
✟230,471.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Your evidence so far has shown you know nothing about energy or what makes God; God.


Wrong. I have asked you to be specific about what you wanted to know about energy. You haven't been specific. The failure is yours.

There is no evidence for God. The null hypothesis instructs us that without evidence there is no valid reason to believe something.

What is the evidence for a god? For any god? How about for your God? If yo believe in one surely there must be some evidence that supports your beliefs.
 
Upvote 0

HitchSlap

PROUDLY PRIMATE
Aug 6, 2012
14,723
5,468
✟288,596.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
I want to know what a photon is, try that one.

Photon
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is about the elementary particle of light. For other uses, see Photon (disambiguation).
Photon
Military laser experiment.jpg
Photons emitted in a coherent beam from a laser
Composition Elementary particle
Statistics Bosonic
Interactions Electromagnetic
Symbol γ, hν, or ħω
Theorized Albert Einstein
Mass 0
<1×10&#8722;18 eV/c2[1]
Mean lifetime Stable[1]
Electric charge 0
<1×10&#8722;35 e[1]
Spin 1
Parity &#8722;1[1]
C parity &#8722;1[1]
Condensed I(JPC)=0,1(1&#8722;&#8722[1]
A photon is an elementary particle, the quantum of light and all other forms of electromagnetic radiation, and the force carrier for the electromagnetic force, even when static via virtual photons. The effects of this force are easily observable at both the microscopic and macroscopic level, because the photon has zero rest mass; this allows long distance interactions. Like all elementary particles, photons are currently best explained by quantum mechanics and exhibit wave–particle duality, exhibiting properties of both waves and particles. For example, a single photon may be refracted by a lens or exhibit wave interference with itself, but also act as a particle giving a definite result when its position is measured.
The modern photon concept was developed gradually by Albert Einstein to explain experimental observations that did not fit the classical wave model of light. In particular, the photon model accounted for the frequency dependence of light's energy, and explained the ability of matter and radiation to be in thermal equilibrium. It also accounted for anomalous observations, including the properties of black body radiation, that other physicists, most notably Max Planck, had sought to explain using semiclassical models, in which light is still described by Maxwell's equations, but the material objects that emit and absorb light, do so in amounts of energy that are quantized (i.e., they change energy only by certain particular discrete amounts and cannot change energy in any arbitrary way). Although these semiclassical models contributed to the development of quantum mechanics, many further experiments[2][3] starting with Compton scattering of single photons by electrons, first observed in 1923, validated Einstein's hypothesis that light itself is quantized. In 1926 the chemist Gilbert N. Lewis coined the name photon for these particles, and after 1927, when Arthur H. Compton won the Nobel Prize for his scattering studies, most scientists accepted the validity that quanta of light have an independent existence, and Lewis' term photon for light quanta was accepted.
In the Standard Model of particle physics, photons are described as a necessary consequence of physical laws having a certain symmetry at every point in spacetime. The intrinsic properties of photons, such as charge, mass and spin, are determined by the properties of this gauge symmetry. The photon concept has led to momentous advances in experimental and theoretical physics, such as lasers, Bose–Einstein condensation, quantum field theory, and the probabilistic interpretation of quantum mechanics. It has been applied to photochemistry, high-resolution microscopy, and measurements of molecular distances. Recently, photons have been studied as elements of quantum computers and for sophisticated applications in optical communication such as quantum cryptography.
Contents [hide]
1 Nomenclature
2 Physical properties
2.1 Experimental checks on photon mass
3 Historical development
4 Early objections
5 Wave–particle duality and uncertainty principles
6 Bose–Einstein model of a photon gas
7 Stimulated and spontaneous emission
8 Second quantization
9 The hadronic properties of the photon
10 The photon as a gauge boson
11 Contributions to the mass of a system
12 Photons in matter
13 Technological applications
14 Recent research
15 See also
16 Notes
17 References
18 Additional references
Nomenclature[edit source | editbeta]

Standard model of particle physics
CERN LHC Tunnel1.jpg
Large Hadron Collider tunnel at CERN
Background[show]
Constituents[show]
Limitations[show]
Scientists[show]
v t e
In 1900, Max Planck was working on black-body radiation and suggested that the energy in electromagnetic waves could only be released in "packets" of energy. In his 1901 article [4] in Annalen der Physik he called these packets "energy elements". The word quanta (singular quantum) was used even before 1900 to mean particles or amounts of different quantities, including electricity. Later, in 1905 Albert Einstein went further by suggesting that electromagnetic waves could only exist in these discrete wave-packets.[5] He called such a wave-packet the light quantum (German: das Lichtquant). The name photon derives from the Greek word for light, &#966;&#8182;&#962; (transliterated phôs), and was coined[Note 1] in 1926 by the physical chemist Gilbert Lewis, who published a speculative theory in which photons were "uncreatable and indestructible".[6] Although Lewis' theory was never accepted as it was contradicted by many experiments, his new name, photon, was adopted immediately by most physicists. Isaac Asimov credits Arthur Compton with defining quanta of energy as photons in 1923.[7][8]
In physics, a photon is usually denoted by the symbol &#947; (the Greek letter gamma). This symbol for the photon probably derives from gamma rays, which were discovered in 1900 by Paul Villard,[9][10] named by Ernest Rutherford in 1903, and shown to be a form of electromagnetic radiation in 1914 by Rutherford and Edward Andrade.[11] In chemistry and optical engineering, photons are usually symbolized by h&#957;, the energy of a photon, where h is Planck's constant and the Greek letter &#957; (nu) is the photon's frequency. Much less commonly, the photon can be symbolized by hf, where its frequency is denoted by f.
Physical properties[edit source | editbeta]

See also: Special relativity


The cone shows possible values of wave 4-vector of a photon. Green and indigo represent left and right polarization
A photon is massless,[Note 2] has no electric charge,[12] and is stable. A photon has two possible polarization states. In the momentum representation, which is preferred in quantum field theory, a photon is described by its wave vector, which determines its wavelength &#955; and its direction of propagation. A photon's wave vector may not be zero and can be represented either as a spacial 3-vector or as a (relativistic) four-vector; in the latter case it belongs to the light cone (pictured). Different signs of the four-vector denote different circular polarizations, but in the 3-vector representation one should account for the polarization state separately; it actually is a spin quantum number. In both cases the space of possible wave vectors is three-dimensional.
The photon is the gauge boson for electromagnetism,[13] and therefore all other quantum numbers of the photon (such as lepton number, baryon number, and flavour quantum numbers) are zero.[14]
Photons are emitted in many natural processes. For example, when a charge is accelerated it emits synchrotron radiation. During a molecular, atomic or nuclear transition to a lower energy level, photons of various energy will be emitted, from radio waves to gamma rays. A photon can also be emitted when a particle and its corresponding antiparticle are annihilated (for example, electron–positron annihilation).
In empty space, the photon moves at c (the speed of light) and its energy and momentum are related by E = pc, where p is the magnitude of the momentum vector p. This derives from the following relativistic relation, with m = 0:[15]
E^{2}=p^{2} c^{2} + m^{2} c^{4}.
The energy and momentum of a photon depend only on its frequency (&#957 or inversely, its wavelength (&#955:
E=\hbar\omega=h\nu=\frac{hc}{\lambda}
\boldsymbol{p}=\hbar\boldsymbol{k},
where k is the wave vector (where the wave number k = |k| = 2&#960;/&#955, &#969; = 2&#960;&#957; is the angular frequency, and &#295; = h/2&#960; is the reduced Planck constant.[16]
Since p points in the direction of the photon's propagation, the magnitude of the momentum is
p=\hbar k=\frac{h\nu}{c}=\frac{h}{\lambda}.
The photon also carries spin angular momentum that does not depend on its frequency.[17] The magnitude of its spin is \scriptstyle{\sqrt{2} \hbar} and the component measured along its direction of motion, its helicity, must be ±&#295;. These two possible helicities, called right-handed and left-handed, correspond to the two possible circular polarization states of the photon.[18]
To illustrate the significance of these formulae, the annihilation of a particle with its antiparticle in free space must result in the creation of at least two photons for the following reason. In the center of mass frame, the colliding antiparticles have no net momentum, whereas a single photon always has momentum (since it is determined, as we have seen, only by the photon's frequency or wavelength—which cannot be zero). Hence, conservation of momentum (or equivalently, translational invariance) requires that at least two photons are created, with zero net momentum. (However, it is possible if the system interacts with another particle or field for annihilation to produce one photon, as when a positron annihilates with a bound atomic electron, it is possible for only one photon to be emitted, as the nuclear Coulomb field breaks translational symmetry.) The energy of the two photons, or, equivalently, their frequency, may be determined from conservat
 
Upvote 0

HitchSlap

PROUDLY PRIMATE
Aug 6, 2012
14,723
5,468
✟288,596.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Web definitions
Empirical research is research that derives its data by means of direct observation or experiment, such research is used to answer.......

Have you observed either forces?

I own a photon emission canon.
 
Upvote 0

Subduction Zone

Regular Member
Dec 17, 2012
32,629
12,069
✟230,471.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Web definitions
Empirical research is research that derives its data by means of direct observation or experiment, such research is used to answer.......

Have you observed either forces?


I don't think you quoted that correctly. Try again.

I have observed the effects of gravity and of electromagnetism. In fact I am doing so right now. How about you?
 
Upvote 0

toolmanjantzi

Veteran
Site Supporter
Feb 1, 2013
2,505
28
Sundridge, Ontario
✟72,222.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
Subduction Zone said:
How so?

Aren't all definitions of God mythical?

How about you give me your empirical evidence of what attributes are required for the existence of a God.

Does your concept of God, make him God?
 
Upvote 0

toolmanjantzi

Veteran
Site Supporter
Feb 1, 2013
2,505
28
Sundridge, Ontario
✟72,222.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
HitchSlap said:
Which god are you referring to?

I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, saith the Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty. (Revelation 1:8 KJV)

Which one are you thinking about?
 
Upvote 0

HitchSlap

PROUDLY PRIMATE
Aug 6, 2012
14,723
5,468
✟288,596.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
How about you give me your empirical evidence of what attributes are required for the existence of a God.

Does your concept of God, make him God?

He's your concept, existing inside the bounds of your mind alone, suppose you tell us what attributes we might be able to empirically test if he existed in reality.
 
Upvote 0

HitchSlap

PROUDLY PRIMATE
Aug 6, 2012
14,723
5,468
✟288,596.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, saith the Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty. (Revelation 1:8 KJV)

Which one are you thinking about?

Doesn't matter to me. I'm an equal opportunity atheist. I'd just like to know which one you're talking about before we proceed. Care to try and define him yet?
 
Upvote 0

Archaeopteryx

Wanderer
Jul 1, 2007
22,229
2,608
✟78,240.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Usually when a rock gets thrown at a pack of scientific wolves, the one that barks the loudest is the one that got hit.

So what point was it that I made that caused you spill over like this?

just wondering.

carry on.

gradyll, do you actually plan on answering my questions sometime soon?
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.