• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
Status
Not open for further replies.

oldsage

Veteran
Nov 4, 2005
1,307
70
56
Pinellas Park, FL
✟1,833.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others
And sometimes as Christians we hold fast, uncompromising in the face of terrible error.
I personally wouldn't want you to change unless you become convinced.

I am not saying Jesus is not fully divine and fully man. To deny that Jesus is God is not to deny His divinity. There is a Divine unity of the Father and Son, but they are not the same person (nor are they two persons as one person).

I would have to ask, what do you believe "divine" means? What is it to be God? Now the Trinity Doctrine doesn't say they are the same person, nor does it say they are two persons in one person. God is one in His ontos, and three in persona. That is about the shortest I can say it.

Well, I will pick this up tomorrow, now I need to rest.
Take care,

Chris
 
Reactions: Sophia7
Upvote 0

oldsage

Veteran
Nov 4, 2005
1,307
70
56
Pinellas Park, FL
✟1,833.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others
Do you mean Montanist - gifts of the Spirit, prophecy et al?

No, I am using the term monist in the anthopological sense, man being a holistic being as opposed to trichatomy and dicatomy.

Respectully,
Chris
 
Upvote 0

oldsage

Veteran
Nov 4, 2005
1,307
70
56
Pinellas Park, FL
✟1,833.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others
I believe Divine means the nature or character(istics) of God.

The question would be, what Characteristics?
God has communicable and incommunicable characteristics, we possess the communicable ones. How is Jesus different from us then?

Chris.
 
Upvote 0

Tishri1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 28, 2004
59,894
4,321
Southern California
✟347,174.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Nicene Creed

(Romans 10: 8-10; 1 John 4: 15)
(Deuteronomy 6: 4, Ephesians 4: 6)
(Matthew 6: 9)
(Exodus 6: 3)
(Genesis 1: 1)
(Colossians 1: 15-16)

(Acts 11: 17)
(Mathew 14: 33; 16: 16)
(John 1: 18; 3: 16)
. (John 1: 2)
(Psalm 27: 1; John 8: 12; Matthew 17: 2,5)
(John 17: 1-5)
(John 1: 18)
(John 10: 30)
(Hebrews 1: 1-2)
(1 Timothy 2: 4-5)
(John 6: 33,35)
(Luke 1: 35)
(John 1: 14)
(Mark 15: 25; 1 Corinthians 15: 3)
(John 19: 6)
(Mark 8: 31)
. (Luke 23: 53; 1 Corinthians 15: 4)
(Luke 24: 1 1 Corinthians 15: 4)
(Luke 24: 51; Acts 1: 10)
(Mark 16: 19; Acts 7: 55)
(Matthew 24: 27)
(Acts 10: 42; 2 Timothy 4: 1)
(2 Peter 1: 11)

(John 14: 26)
(Acts 5: 3-4)
(Genesis 1: 2)
(John 15: 26)
(Matthew 3: 16-17)
(1 Samuel 19: 20; Ezekiel 11: 5,13)

(Matthew 16: 18)
(1 Peter 2: 5,9)
(Mark 16: 15)
. (Acts 2: 42; Ephesians 2: 19-22)

. (Ephesians 4: 5; Acts 2: 38)
(John 11: 24; 1 Corinthians 15: 12-49; Hebrews 6: 2; Revelation 20: 5)
(Mark 10: 29-30)

(Psalm 106: 48)

If you do IMO you are Trinitarian
 
Upvote 0

Sophia7

Tall73's Wife
Site Supporter
Sep 24, 2005
12,364
456
✟84,145.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Changing your view is not an option?

Btw do all SDAs share the same view as yours?

No, most Seventh-day Adventists do believe in the Trinity; it is part of our fundamental beliefs (#2 in the list). There are, however, some Adventists who do not agree with all of our official beliefs.
 
Upvote 0

Sophia7

Tall73's Wife
Site Supporter
Sep 24, 2005
12,364
456
✟84,145.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The Church founders believed in what I believe in, though, which is the funny part.

It is true that some of the founders of the Adventist Church were Semi-Arian. A couple of them had left the Christian Connection Church, which rejected the doctrine of the Trinity; their background influenced their thinking on these subjects. Others had come out of the Methodist Church and other churches that taught the Trinity and didn't have a problem with it.

The early Adventists disagreed with each other on many theological and Christological issues. They didn't have an official statement of beliefs as we have today, nor did they want one at first. However, as they studied and tried to work out these difficulties, they gradually moved toward more orthodox positions on the Trinity and the nature of Christ. The historic Adventist position on things is not always the right one.
 
Upvote 0

lionroar0

Coffee drinker
Jul 10, 2004
9,362
705
54
✟35,401.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single

It looks to me like it's a matter of semantics.

Let me rephrase your post.

The Godhead consists of God the Father, JEsus the Son and the Holy Spirit. All are of the same essence and are coequal but they are different three distinc persons.

How is this?

Peace
 
Upvote 0

tall73

Sophia7's husband
Site Supporter
Sep 23, 2005
32,739
6,135
Visit site
✟1,060,472.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Changing my view is not an option.

Also, no, SDAs in general believe in what eoe posted. The Church founders believed in what I believe in, though, which is the funny part.

So do I have stop posting here? What sections can Non-Trins post in?

Howdy Sunrunner, just trying to get a handle on where you are at here.

James White, Uriah Smith, Waggoner, etc. . believed in semi-arianism, and believed that Jesus at one time in the remote past had a beginning. Is this your view?

Is your concern that you don't want to consider Jesus as God because the title is reserved for the Father in your understanding?

I appreciate your stand either way. You must believe what you are convinced of.
 
Upvote 0

ttreg

Myself
Jan 1, 2006
7,880
67
Florida
Visit site
✟30,932.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
ditto
 
Upvote 0

oldsage

Veteran
Nov 4, 2005
1,307
70
56
Pinellas Park, FL
✟1,833.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others

It looks like the early sda church had the same struggles as the early church where they hashed out things dealing with the nature of God and the nature of Jesus.

Chris
 
Upvote 0

oldsage

Veteran
Nov 4, 2005
1,307
70
56
Pinellas Park, FL
✟1,833.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others
I appreciate your stand either way. You must believe what you are convinced of.

Right, Tall, this I whole heartily agree on. I don't think you should profess something you have no conviction in. Your whole mind and heart needs to be in it for there to be a conviction. Otherwise you are just lying to yourself.

Respectfully,
Chris
 
Upvote 0

Tonks

No longer here
Site Supporter
Aug 15, 2005
21,996
722
Heading home...
✟94,042.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Politics
US-Libertarian
Right, Tall, this I whole heartily agree on. I don't think you should profess something you have no conviction in. Your whole mind and heart needs to be in it for there to be a conviction. Otherwise you are just lying to yourself.

There is somewhat of a difference between maintaining heterdox views of the Trinity and not believing that Jesus is God (per the OP).

That's not "non-Trinitarian" that's not Christian.
 
Upvote 0

tall73

Sophia7's husband
Site Supporter
Sep 23, 2005
32,739
6,135
Visit site
✟1,060,472.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Just an update, Sunrunner has had his icon changed.

In any case, for those wondering, the church was primarily anti-Trinitarian for the early years, associating the Trinity with Catholic notions.

The change first started to take place with some fairly prominent statements by Ellen White.

Some of the statements :







Jesus declared, "I am the resurrection, and the life." In Christ is life, original, unborrowed, underived. "He that hath the Son hath life." The divinity of Christ is the believer's assurance of eternal life.--The Desire of Ages, p. 530 (1898)

The eternal heavenly dignitaries--God, and Christ, and the Holy Spirit--arming them [the disciples] with more than mortal energy, . . . would advance with them to the work and convince the world of sin.--Manuscript 145, 1901.

 
Upvote 0

MEH07

Member
Oct 15, 2006
7
0
✟22,617.00
Faith
Christian
Greetings Sunrunner,


Um, the passage in 1 John 5:7 has nothing at all to do with the Trinity, but that the three things listed (water, blood, Spirit) testify to Jesus being the Son of God - the water (Jesus' baptism, together with the Father's words to Christ at the time), the blood (the cross, together with the resurrection), and the Spirit (who was given to Jesus in a special way at His baptism and who guided Him throughout His ministry). The Spirit is the Spirit of truth who reveals God and continues to testify to us about Jesus.

The part of that verse where you talked about "the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost" bearing witness is not in the original manuscripts but is an added phrase called the Johannine Comma, so it should be disregarded - most translations have already done so while others may have a footnote about the verse.

I think that the Trinity issue has been expounded on enough by other users, so I won't bother with it here.
 
Upvote 0

Tinker Grey

Wanderer
Site Supporter
Feb 6, 2002
11,720
6,245
Erewhon
Visit site
✟1,132,160.00
Faith
Atheist
Perhaps this has been said already.

Don't let some quirk in your understanding run you off from this forum or make you change your icon.

Most trinitarians couldn't explain the trinity if pressed. If they tried they'd be guilty of some heresy.

Many of us can formulate the trinity according to tradition. But, every explanation borders heresy.

Fundamentally, any explanation or analogy I've ever heard that makes any sense at all is guilty of heresy. The only non-heretical position is that it can't be understood (which, to me, is a most unsatisfactory state of affairs).

Don't let it bother you that you have an idea that works for you that sets someone elses bells off.

HTH
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.