Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Sort of the good old "God created a problem so that there could be a solution"?Yes rather wouldnt exist, not absolutely, but relatively to human good. If God is for mankind, he is against evil. He's like big brother giving tips on playing chess with the cosmos. No cosmos, no chess, no problem.
Or God created evolution to do it.Either that or evoluiton did it.
For the sake of argument, let's say God has already done this: a lot of the (seemingly) bizarre and brutal laws in the Old Testament are now thought to be related to hygiene. Pigs for example carry far more parasites and diseases than other livestock, which is probably why it was forbidden to eat them. Rather than waiting for centuries for scientists and doctors to figure out why people are more likely to die after eating pork rather than beef, God just comes straight out and says "Don't eat pigs." Chances are most people still wouldn't listen.God could end human suffering or teach us about evil he could at any time and would take no effort from him to devise a perfect plan to enable humans to live in harmony with each other. If I was in his boots I would. I don't see the point in creating something then doing nothing while it suffers needlessly.
For the sake of argument, let's say God has already done this: a lot of the (seemingly) bizarre and brutal laws in the Old Testament are now thought to be related to hygiene. Pigs for example carry far more parasites and diseases than other livestock, which is probably why it was forbidden to eat them. Rather than waiting for centuries for scientists and doctors to figure out why people are more likely to die after eating pork rather than beef, God just comes straight out and says "Don't eat pigs." Chances are most people still wouldn't listen.
Like I said earlier, instructions on how to make pigs edible probably would not have made sense to people living 3,000 years ago. Even if they were willing to follow what He said despite the fact that it didn't made sense (because He is God and we should do as He says), they simply didn't have the technology required to make it safe to eat - they couldn't manufacture antibiotics, for example. Another reason why pork (rather than lamb, beef, chicken etc.) is more hazardous to eat is because, for whatever reason, pigs seems far more prone to parasites and diseases than other animals. It is more difficult to make pig meat sanitary enough to eat than it does other livestock.If God is coming down to tell us how to best live life, why on earth would his last word on pigs be "They are unclean; do not eat them or touch their carcasses"? Why not some caveat, like "Pigs are unclean; should thou find a way to cleanse the pig, only then may thou eat it"? Heck, he could even explain how to cleanse the pig! The Hindus and Buddhists seem to have figured this one out; why couldn't God have explained it?
Like I said earlier, instructions on how to make pigs edible probably would not have made sense to people living 3,000 years ago. Even if they were willing to follow what He said despite the fact that it didn't made sense (because He is God and we should do as He says), they simply didn't have the technology required to make it safe to eat - they couldn't manufacture antibiotics, for example. Another reason why pork (rather than lamb, beef, chicken etc.) is more hazardous to eat is because, for whatever reason, pigs seems far more prone to parasites and diseases than other animals. It is more difficult to make pig meat sanitary enough to eat than it does other livestock.
For people living in the desert 3,000 years ago, with no means of technology to make an "unclean" animal clean and with plenty of other meat options available, simply telling them not to eat it makes more sense.
As for whether it should be a moral or a hygiene law, I'd look at the smoking debate again: it is simply unhealthy to smoke, or is it morally wrong (given that we now know most of the consequences and choose to smoke anyway)?
I think part of the reason many of us (especially the non-religious users) find the idea that we can learn from evil and suffering abhorrent is because we are still clinging to the idea that "diabolical evil" is something that shouldn't exist and should be destroyed. If something that shouldn't exist can be useful - because we can learn from it - then it becomes hard to argue that we should get rid of it.
To use a random example: the Zika virus in Brazil causes severe birth defects in babies if their mothers catch it while pregnant. What could we possibly learn from this? ...Actually quite a lot:
But maybe that last part is debatable... if there are so many potential benefits to the virus, then why would we want to get rid of it?
- Biologically: we can see how viruses evolve, how they spread via mosquitoes, how it affects the development of the foetus etc.
- Society: in recent decades people have learned to be far more accepting of disabled people. If people are more accepting perhaps there will be fewer abortions.
- Personally: parents learn that having a disabled child is not in the end of the world and that they can still bring a lot of joy into their lives.
- Medically: if we can learn what causes the birth defects then perhaps we can also learn how to cure it.
Even if we do get rid of it - how? Do we destroy the virus? Destroy the mosquito that carries the virus? Destroy the forests the mosquitoes that carry the virus live in? That last part might sound a bit extreme, but keep in mind that building hospitals and day centres and special needs schools (all of which the affected babies and parents will need because of that damned virus) often destroys large parts of the environment.
So - the virus itself (potentially) has a lot of upsides whereas fighting the virus (again, potentially) has a lot of downsides. How then can we argue that the virus is evil e.g. shouldn't exist, and the only way to deal with evil is to get rid of it?
Replace "so" with "such"?Or God created evolution to do it.
Now, evolution isn´t considered an omnibenevolent entity (actually it isn´t even thought of as acting intentionally - thus "evolution did it so that there could be a solution" is an inaccurate statement), so I´m not sure how your remark is relevant for the topic at hand.
Or God created everything just the way it is because He has a purpose for everything being just the way it is.
He wanted the context.
The idea that evil must exist in order for good to exist is found in Eastern mystic religions such as Buddhism or Hinduism. That evil is something bad which needs to be destroyed, however, is found in the Abrahamic religions. So from a Christian POV no, there will not be evil in Heaven.
Were God to simply give us whatever wisdom comes from facing evil, there's no guarantee we would actually listen to it. If however we were to actually face a problem ourselves we'd probably understand how to deal with it far better. Or to put it another way - knowledge earned is a lot more useful than knowledge given.
It's also worth pointing out that the idea that evil can be useful (because it helps us gain wisdom) is a philosophical concept which is meant to bring together the idea that evil is simply the opposite of good [nondualistic evil] with the idea that evil is something to be destroyed because it shouldn't exist [diabolical evil]. It's focuses more on how we should react to evil rather than where evil comes from.
^This
To me it seems obvious that the presence of evil is there because He wants it there. Think about it. If we are believers then we are believers and children of light. But, we MUST be attached to the flesh during this life. The flesh (and evil) is there for us to war against and overcome.
I believe in the thousand year reign of Christ and the entire kingdom will have a heirarchy. The degree to which you resisted evil and overcame the flesh and the world will determine your rank in the kingdom.
This is all my opinion but this theory fits well when you must explain evil.
Sure. These kind of answers still need to be evaluated.
But it is one step forward.
What else can be filled in?
Evil is a tool used by God to _____ human.
Obviously, this should be related to the relationship between God and human.
For the sake of argument, let's say God has already done this: a lot of the (seemingly) bizarre and brutal laws in the Old Testament are now thought to be related to hygiene. Pigs for example carry far more parasites and diseases than other livestock, which is probably why it was forbidden to eat them. Rather than waiting for centuries for scientists and doctors to figure out why people are more likely to die after eating pork rather than beef, God just comes straight out and says "Don't eat pigs." Chances are most people still wouldn't listen.
We could argue that we are more likely to listen to doctors and scientists rather than God because the scientists have studies and evidence to back up what they say, whereas we are expected to listen to God just because He says so. We could also argue that we should listen to God (or the Bible) because He is all-knowing, whereas doctors and scientists are fallible humans, and their studies can be wrong.
Even if God were to come down and explain WHY He has forbidden us to eat pork (using germ theory,parasite life cycles etc.) we probably still wouldn't listen - because we wouldn't accept it as the truth until we discovered it for ourselves. Not to mention 3,000 years ago none of these theories would have made the slightest bit of sense to the Hebrews.
Most of us don't refuse to do what we're told because we don't understand - we refuse because we don't want to. Free will, rather than ignorance, is the culprit.
^This
To me it seems obvious that the presence of evil is there because He wants it there. Think about it. If we are believers then we are believers and children of light. But, we MUST be attached to the flesh during this life. The flesh (and evil) is there for us to war against and overcome.
I believe in the thousand year reign of Christ and the entire kingdom will have a heirarchy. The degree to which you resisted evil and overcame the flesh and the world will determine your rank in the kingdom.
This is all my opinion but this theory fits well when you must explain evil.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?