• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Kira Faye

Spiritualist Witch
Aug 27, 2003
872
26
39
Visit site
✟1,172.00
Faith
Pagan
You know anouther way to get rid of a fetus is just to kill urself, some peopel wouldn;t have much else of a choice if abortion was nto allowed, or a backyard abortion, stick a crochet needle up and let the girl bleed to death, or better yet dump the child liek they do in china when they have extra children, much better alternative to let the child die in the cold then to have never experianced any pain really.

As you can see there are not really any pretty sides, we migth as well for the sake of humanity allow abortions so we don't have to see the above. I would prefer that it never was needed as an option, cause people are lose in their ways or get attacked. I would like to see adoption of the child or keeping it of people in that situation, btu I wish the situation never occured and people never had to make that drastic choice. The people who are in real trouble with pregnancy, liek rape medical problems, shoudl get our support not to be condemmed.
 
Upvote 0

jazzbird

Senior Veteran
Mar 11, 2004
2,450
154
Wisconsin
✟27,241.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
Either a fetus is a living human being, or it is not. If it is a human being then abortion is murder. We don't have the choice to murder an individual who is outside the womb, why are we given the choice to murder one who is not yet born?
 
Reactions: Bob Moore
Upvote 0

AdJesumPerMariam

To Jesus through Mary
Jan 26, 2004
38,016
932
68
At Home
Visit site
✟59,121.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Mylinkay Asdara said:
Excuse me? Wouldn't the woman qualify as an innocent party in rape, or are you one of the few remaining cavemen who thinkthat women (and apprantly children) bring rape on themselves?

I don't think that is what he meant. Our society is much too easy on rapist. (castration?) Anyways, there are 2 innocent parties here, the baby, and the mama. I have seen some mamas keep their children & raise them, thinking they are blessings, and I have seen girls give their babies up for adoption after rape. Both were similarily happy with the decisions they made.
I am just saying there are better ways than abortion.

Love-n-Blessings
dee
 
Upvote 0

Bob Moore

Reformed Apologist
Dec 16, 2003
936
38
77
North Carolina
✟23,884.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Mylinkay Asdara said:
Excuse me? Wouldn't the woman qualify as an innocent party in rape, or are you one of the few remaining cavemen who thinkthat women (and apprantly children) bring rape on themselves?

I meant innocent in the sense of not yet having done anything. Truly innocent, playing no part, having no say, and winding up as the ultimate victim. There is something terribly wrong with that.
 
Upvote 0

jazzbird

Senior Veteran
Mar 11, 2004
2,450
154
Wisconsin
✟27,241.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
Why wouldn't a woman "have much else of a choice if abortion was not allowed" than to:

A. Kill herself to get rid of the baby
or
B. Get a back alley abortion to get rid of the baby

Yes, pregnancy can be a great inconvenience, and it can be embarressing and even shameful depending on your family and community, but are these really the only options you can come up with other than legal abortion?? It's all about "choice," right? No one is dragging this woman into some seedy place with a greasy guy with a dirty coat hanger. If that's what she wants to do to deal with her problem - that's her choice.

What is so horrible in this woman's life that she would go to such measures rather than carry the child for nine months? She doesn't have to keep it, and be responsible for it for the rest of her life. That too is her choice.

You're right - it's not a pretty issue any way you look at it. No one here is condemning. I, and most pro-life people, are not against abortion because we think people should be punished, but rather because the baby is a human being, and as a human being it deserves our protection, even in the case of rape. A human being is a human being. It doesn't matter the circumstances surrounding it's creation. There is already one victim in the situation of rape. We do not need to make it two. BTW, 95% of the abortions performed are "birth control" abortions. There is a very small percent which are due to rape or endangered health. I do not dismiss those cases, simply because they are few in comparison, but it is not a reason to end another life.
 
Reactions: Knight
Upvote 0

flicka

Contributor
Site Supporter
Dec 9, 2003
7,939
617
✟60,156.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
Bob Moore said:
If a woman does not want to have a child there is a sure fire way to avoid it that does not involve murder. Abstain.

I just had a mental image of a world where no woman ever, anywhere, would have sex unless she was 100% willing to carry a baby for 9 months and give birth....what a outcry there would be from the men!
 
Upvote 0

AdJesumPerMariam

To Jesus through Mary
Jan 26, 2004
38,016
932
68
At Home
Visit site
✟59,121.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
There are natural ways of avoiding pregnancy...there are only about 3 days out of the month a woman is furtile-abstain on those days! Also, what is SO WRONG about waiting until you are married? Are women of today so afraid of not pleasing a man?

Love-n-Blessings
dee
 
Upvote 0

flicka

Contributor
Site Supporter
Dec 9, 2003
7,939
617
✟60,156.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private

hehe...well lots of married women don't want a baby every 9 months either..
 
Upvote 0

AdJesumPerMariam

To Jesus through Mary
Jan 26, 2004
38,016
932
68
At Home
Visit site
✟59,121.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
flicka said:
hehe...well lots of married women don't want a baby every 9 months either..

So again, whats wrong with abstaining the 3 fertile days a month? It would be much cheaper than an abortion, or birth control...

Love-n-Blessings
dee
 
Upvote 0

jazzbird

Senior Veteran
Mar 11, 2004
2,450
154
Wisconsin
✟27,241.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
flicka said:
hehe...well lots of married women don't want a baby every 9 months either..
What is the big deal about birth control? Sure, it's not fullproof, but if used correctly it's very effective. I wonder how many women who have abortions are responsible about protecting themselves from unwanted pregnancy before they get pregnant. There are way too many abortions performed in this country for all of those women to have been on birth control when they got pregnant.
 
Upvote 0

flicka

Contributor
Site Supporter
Dec 9, 2003
7,939
617
✟60,156.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private

I agree 100%!!!

I think most educated women are responsible about using bc but it needs to be more readily available and education is a must. Men need to be more active about this as well.
 
Upvote 0

Outspoken

Standing in the Gap
Nov 8, 2002
6,441
16
48
✟29,688.00
Faith
Christian
Mylinkay Asdara said:
Excuse me? Wouldn't the woman qualify as an innocent party in rape, or are you one of the few remaining cavemen who thinkthat women (and apprantly children) bring rape on themselves?
I think the applicable analogy is that someone leaves a baby on your doorstep in a blizzard. you cannot get the child to anyone else for the next few weeks. Do you leave it to die outside simply because it was forced on you?
 
Upvote 0

Outspoken

Standing in the Gap
Nov 8, 2002
6,441
16
48
✟29,688.00
Faith
Christian
flicka said:
I agree 100%!!!

I think most educated women are responsible about using bc but it needs to be more readily available and education is a must. Men need to be more active about this as well.
I totally agree. I would venture to say that around 80% or so of women that get abortions are because of just unwanted pregency, with no life threatening problems. They just didn't want to use birth control.
 
Upvote 0

jazzbird

Senior Veteran
Mar 11, 2004
2,450
154
Wisconsin
✟27,241.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
Well, I did a little searching on contraceptive use and abortion. This is what I have found so far:

The following is from a recent study in MN. I'm not sure how they compare with the rest of the country, or the west in general:
http://www.mccl.org/birthcontrol90.pdf

This is a side note, but I found it rather shocking:
http://www.popcouncil.org/mediacenter/newsreleases/sfp900bongaarts.html
 
Upvote 0

jazzbird

Senior Veteran
Mar 11, 2004
2,450
154
Wisconsin
✟27,241.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
Outspoken said:
I totally agree. I would venture to say that around 80% or so of women that get abortions are because of just unwanted pregency, with no life threatening problems. They just didn't want to use birth control.
Actually the percentage is even higher than 80%, at least in all the statistics I have seen. It's around 95%.
 
Upvote 0

jazzbird

Senior Veteran
Mar 11, 2004
2,450
154
Wisconsin
✟27,241.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
flicka said:
I agree 100%!!!

I think most educated women are responsible about using bc but it needs to be more readily available and education is a must. Men need to be more active about this as well.

I'm very glad we can agree on that!

Women need to be educated about various bc methods and how to use them effectively, and I also believe that abstinance should be taught and strongly encouraged in high schools, but I am not for abstinance only education, because we still need to prepare them and give them proper knowledge. I don't believe that schools should be handing out condoms, though.
 
Upvote 0

transientlife

lotus on the mount
Mar 21, 2004
1,300
52
✟1,724.00
Faith
Christian
jazzbird said:
Either a fetus is a living human being, or it is not. If it is a human being then abortion is murder. We don't have the choice to murder an individual who is outside the womb, why are we given the choice to murder one who is not yet born?

I quite disagree. I'm not debating if the fetus is living or not. And we do have the choice to murder an individual outside the womb, it's more or less the exercising of that choice. Most people CHOOSE not to kill others because of the repercussions and/or individual's morals. You completely missed the point I was trying to make in the post, but oh well. To each our own. I choose to let individuals decide for themselves and let them deal with the consequences...not impose my morals and ethics on those who may not share the same. It's their body, their kid (or not, depending) and none of my business.
 
Upvote 0