Oh, I guess that will collect itself. It's foolproof because no one has ever cheated on that even with IRS oversight.It is called payroll deduction.
It's a good idea if you want to see the deficit soar and our government crash.
of course we can trust the bosses to actually turn in the money they deduct, as opposed to pocketing it.
Yes, didn't you know that all business people behave ethically?
Perhaps Obama's revered Treasury secretary, the guy in charge of the IRS, convicted tax cheat Timothy Geithner?Of course -- if you can't trust the patrons of offshore tax shelters and dollar-a-year CEOs to be ethical with money, then who can you trust?
Perhaps Obama's revered Treasury secretary, the guy in charge of the IRS, convicted tax cheat Timothy Geithner?
Playing fast and loose? Timmeh is not the Treasury Secretary anymore. Nor is he a convicted tax cheat.
And even if he were -- crooks in Washington? Say it ain't so, Shoeless Joe!
LOL ... didn't say he still was.Playing fast and loose? Timmeh is not the Treasury Secretary anymore.
Now who's playing fast and loose?Nor is he a convicted tax cheat.
[/INDENT]"Not being convicted" is a distinction without a difference when the IRS is involved. The IRS rarely goes to actual court when it prosecutes ... as it did in Geithner's case.
OK, then ...Then you probably shouldn't have called him "convicted." The truth will set you free.
Perhaps Obama's revered Treasury secretary, the guy in charge of the IRS,Of course -- if you can't trust the patrons of offshore tax shelters and dollar-a-year CEOs to be ethical with money, then who can you trust?
OK, then ...
[NHE does quick correction ... redoing prior post ... in its entirety ... ]
Perhaps Obama's revered Treasury secretary, the guy in charge of the IRS,convictedconfessed tax cheat Timothy Geithner who admitted guilt only after being caught by IRS enforcers?
It's a start, now let's work on "revered," and "cheat"?
One can hope.Besides, we're doing away with the IRS enforcers, remember?
It is curious that the IRS needs such people to enforce a "voluntary" tax system.Clearly men of Geithner's moral character need no jackbooted thugs to keep them in line.
It is called payroll deduction.
Please show me the law that says I must pay an income tax. I'll wait.Admittedly, I only read the headline, not watched the video, but:
ABOLISH the IRS? How would taxes be collected, then?
For sure, it seems that the proverbial guillotine needs to be put to heavy use in the IRS, but there's a long way from that, to "abolish it" altogether.
Lols - you linked to letters to the editor?LOL ... didn't say he still was.
Now who's playing fast and loose?Mr. Geithner "came clean" only when he was caught, first by an IRS audit that found he owed Social Security taxes for 2003 and 2004 and then when additional tax liabilities for 2001 and 2002 were discovered after his nomination. Timothy Geithner's Tax Problems | Washington Post
The difference is huge - it's the difference between being convicted and not being convicted in a criminal court. The "evasion" was pretty minimal - he didn't do his own taxes and he had paid every year."Not being convicted" is a distinction without a difference when the IRS is involved. The IRS rarely goes to actual court when it prosecutes ... as it did in Geithner's case.
LOL ... let's go with your "scenario" then, DaisyDay. It only strengthens the Ted Cruz argument.Lols - you linked to letters to the editor?
The difference is huge - it's the difference between being convicted and not being convicted in a criminal court. The "evasion" was pretty minimal - he didn't do his own taxes and he had paid every year.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?