Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Yes this is very important when one is trying to actually put someone in jail or in this case remove from office. What's happening now is Nadler is left to try to 'prove' Schiff's narrative and timeline with a lot of speculation and innuendo as the sinew.
And again, I have repeatedly asked if the subpoenas are legal why has congress not pursued them through the courts?....so far no answer.See post #5.
So, you don't have any evidence....that's ok, no one else has been able to supply any either.The stuff in the testimony of the various witnesses and included in the report from the committee. You know, speaking of consistent, the one that GOP members both didn't have the time to read while at the same time are confident that it contains no evidence. Yet another argument seemingly made in bad faith.
And again, I have repeatedly asked if the subpoenas are legal why has congress not pursued them through the courts?
You mean Intelligence Committee?.....that is almost an oxymoron, isn't it?but the House Justice committee isn't finished yet either. So stay tuned.
So, you don't have an answer....that's ok, no one else does either.Wow, that was a quick change of subject.
So, you don't have any evidence....that's ok, no one else has been able to supply any either.
Ah yeah, the ignore the content of the reply and assert victory tactic. That's a sure sign of a viewpoint that's well backed by facts and reasonable inferences.So, you don't have an answer
I am quite aware of, and have read a fair amount of, the amount of testimony given but the volume of testimony in no way implies its veracity. In fact, witness after witness has contradicted other witnesses as well as themselves and still not one of them have any 1st hand knowledge or evidence that Trump made any such demand of anyone. Now, if I am wrong about this, here is you chance to show me. Please, some substantiated evidence that Trump has done what the claimed 'charges' accuse him of and you will have converted me to your side.Weird you seem to be both unaware of the volumes of testimony over the past few weeks and at the same time aggressively confident that there's nothing incriminating in it. Kinda reminds me of the stuff we heard from the GOP yesterday - they didn't have time to read the committee report but were positive there was no evidence in there.
I'll try but men's group reading club has priority. Maybe someone can ping me when they find "Rudy in the drawing room with the candlestick."So stay tuned.
You have not produced anything therefore I can't take your comments seriously......Ah yeah, the ignore the content of the reply and assert victory tactic. That's a sure sign of a viewpoint that's well backed by facts and reasonable inferences.
If the House proceeds solely on the Ukrainian allegations, this impeachment would stand out among modern impeachments as the shortest proceeding, with the thinnest evidentiary record, and the narrowest grounds ever used to impeach a president.7 That does not bode well for future presidents who are working in a country often sharply and, at times, bitterly divided.
You mean Intelligence Committee?.....that is almost an oxymoron, isn't it?
Your post said the 'Justice' committee, something I had never heard of..No, the Intelligence Committee (under Schiff) is done. The Judiciary Committee (under Nadler) is now undertaking the inquiry.
Is a president lying about a personal affair a threat to the democracy or national security of USA?IIRC, Clinton actually did commit perjury and temporarily lost his law license over it.
The court system can be dragged out for years. Once one court makes a ruling, it then gets challenged and so goes up to the next level of court, then when that court makes a ruling, it again gets challenged...And again, I have repeatedly asked if the subpoenas are legal why has congress not pursued them through the courts?....so far no answer.
Here in the US things like this can be expedited and move quickly up the chain to SCOTUS if necessary.The court system can be dragged out for years. Once one court makes a ruling, it then gets challenged and so goes up to the next level of court, then when that court makes a ruling, it again gets challenged...
Yes. His lie opens him up to blackmail especially the longer it is kept secret.Is a president lying about a personal affair a threat to the democracy or national security of USA?
Did Bill Clinton pose an ongoing threat to USA?
Yes. See above comment.If setting a precedence that USA presidents can have extra marital affairs, does this pose a threat to the future of USA, for future presidents and future administrations?
What did he do and what evidence do you have to prove it?What Trump did was far more serious, and does pose an ongoing threat to USA.
From what I've seen, these things drag on, and on, and on.Here in the US things like this can be expedited and move quickly up the chain to SCOTUS if necessary.
There is an abundance of evidence, which people have already mentioned.What did he do and what evidence do you have to prove it?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?