• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

A re-examination of nothing

Status
Not open for further replies.
P

Phinehas2

Guest
It would be good to consider that there are no new arguments being presented in this re-examination. All have been studied and discussed at length. If one reads for example the debates between Gagnon and Wink, all these arguments are thrashed out. These arguments include both sides of the argument ..all the claims that same-sex sex isnt condemned from the gay theologians such as Scroggs and McNeil and the theologians who were gay such as Boswell.

The bottom line is all the challenges to the translations of passages such as 1 Cor 6, 1 Tim 1, Romans 1, Lev 18 & 20, Genesis 19 etc. have all been made and refuted. One is left with either believing same-sex unions are condemned most strongly, or they arent.
For those who dont believe same-sex unions arent condmened, ther eis still them nothing in the Bible that countenances them and a stark absence of any countenance. On top of this one then has to deal with Genesis 2, Matt 19, Eph 5, 1 Cor 7, where God's purpose in creation is woman for man in union, with celibacy offered as the alternatve.

When I debate this issue, one pro-same-sex poster says the passage means one thing and another says something else, both merely to disprove what the passage actually says, they are not seeking the truth but seeking to overturn the truth.
Its the second biggest deception currently in the church after pluralism, and incidently the pro-gay contingent are usually the pluralists as well.
 
Upvote 0

tulc

loves "SO'S YER MOM!! posts!
May 18, 2002
49,401
18,804
70
✟286,600.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

Uhmm that may be what you heard but that's not what she said.
she said:
The Bible is not God's word to us. The Bible is the word of men INSPIRED by God... huge difference.
What in her statement says what you said it says? In fact I'll go one better: what in her statement is even wrong?
tulc(needs some coffee)
 
Upvote 0

davedjy

Well-Known Member
Dec 11, 2006
2,184
1,080
Southern California
✟33,592.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
Dear Davedjy,

Its not even a leap, its fairly obvious, especially as 1 Tim 1 refers to the law, and as this is a list of sins with fornication and adultery its about as much proof as one needs.
If it was so obvious, why is it that there are different translations of it, and even from different Bible translations?

It is unknown, because I only gave you what the word means broken a part, you still don't put that together and get "homosexual". A promiscuous man was another sound interpretation (a male who goes from bed to bed). Seeing that interpretation should make you understand why a word meaning "Male" and "beds" still can mean something other than homosexual. As stated, it was universally translated as those who touch at the time of Martin Luther. I do not trust the NIV, whole parts of it have had to be thrown out in the past, so in answer to your question, I don't believe it to be an accurate Bible version.

Already answered: Male pimp, male prostitute, promiscuous male, those who touch, etc.

Trying to "justify" something is irrelevant to this debate forum, but many here don't try to justify anything about explain their beliefs.
 
Upvote 0

davedjy

Well-Known Member
Dec 11, 2006
2,184
1,080
Southern California
✟33,592.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
Greek, "koit" is the direct derivative to "coitus", sexual intercourse. "Arsenokoitai" definitely refers to a male having sexual intercourse with another male.

How convenient to ignore the obvious...
There is only one male (singular) in the word, and even your own God-inspired translators do not all agree on that translation (hence the male pimp, masturbator, and male prostitute translations).


At best, you have demonstrated only ONE usage of the word Koitai, but there are actually 3. Even if you got that correct, you still cannot prove that there is more than one male involved.
 
Upvote 0

tulc

loves "SO'S YER MOM!! posts!
May 18, 2002
49,401
18,804
70
✟286,600.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

So you don't believe that the scriptures above are saying that it is hard for a rich man to get into heaven?
I believe that.

You don't believe that alot/most rich people place that wealth above God, and aren't able to put God first and have riches?
I also believe that.

Do you believe that if we take these scriptures with the ones that speak about people loving money and also trying to love God explain each other?
Yes.
Do you not believe that what is simple being pointed out here is that, you can't have two master because you will love the one and dispise the other?
I don't believe you can have two masters.

You don't believe that the scriptures are saying that without God no one can get into heaven?
No I do believe the scriptures say that.

Can I ask what you do think they are saying?
I believe they are saying exactly what they say, we can't serve the World and God at the same time.
What also I believe is I have often heard sermons preached about taking the Bible literally, but when the subject of selling all and following Him comes up, suddenly THAT Scripture isn't so much taught as explained away. Imagine of John 3: 16 was explained the same way?
tulc(is that clearer?)
 
Upvote 0

Floatingaxe

Well-Known Member
Apr 14, 2007
14,757
877
73
Ontario, Canada
✟22,726.00
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives

Seeing as one can't "koit" oneself, one must assume Paul meant one on one! Paul's smart that way, eh...
 
Upvote 0

Danyc

Senior Member
Nov 2, 2007
1,799
100
✟17,670.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
Seeing as one can't "koit" oneself, one must assume Paul meant one on one! Paul's smart that way, eh...

Why not?

To have sex with oneself is generally a reference to masturbation.
I would also point out, strange as it may be...some men are capable of having literal 'relations' with themselves...if you get what I mean.
 
Upvote 0

Floatingaxe

Well-Known Member
Apr 14, 2007
14,757
877
73
Ontario, Canada
✟22,726.00
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
Why not?

To have sex with oneself is generally a reference to masturbation.
I would also point out, strange as it may be...some men are capable of having literal 'relations' with themselves...if you get what I mean.

koit=intercourse. Birds and bees talk required here?
 
Upvote 0

savedandhappy1

Senior Veteran
Oct 27, 2006
1,831
153
Kansas
✟26,444.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Hi everyone.

Back in August some of you might remember me asking for prayer because a family friend was accidently shot by her husband on her sons birthday. She was killed instantly.

Well our crazy cops arrested the husband last night for 2nd degree murder.

The husband has many health problems which are life threating. In fact they stopped paying for his wifes life insurance and put all their money on life insurance for him. They had even made all the arrangements for his death and burial.

Anyhow I may not be on line much to try and help them, so if I miss a post please understand.

Please pray for my friend his 18 year old daughter and 14 year old son as they go through this nightmare that has been going on since August. Also lift his mother and brother up in prayer also. Thanks.
 
Upvote 0

tulc

loves "SO'S YER MOM!! posts!
May 18, 2002
49,401
18,804
70
✟286,600.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Praying Sis!
tulc(and for you as well!)
 
Upvote 0

EnemyPartyII

Well-Known Member
Sep 12, 2006
11,524
893
39
✟20,084.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
In Relationship
*rolls eyes* Fine, if you want to play semantics... PARTS of the Bible, noteably those attributed to Christ, are the words of God.

The rest is the word of men.
 
Upvote 0

Jet_A_Jockey

Jet+Jetslove=2gether4ever :)
Site Supporter
Mar 9, 2006
11,279
1,082
hurricane central
Visit site
✟62,391.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
*rolls eyes* Fine, if you want to play semantics... PARTS of the Bible, noteably those attributed to Christ, are the words of God.

The rest is the word of men.
2 timothy 3:16 , don't pick this apart please.


And on the masturbation subject, that is a very broad word also, and could mean anything outside of standard sexual intercourse (the kind that gets ya pregnant, ya know?)
 
Upvote 0

Floatingaxe

Well-Known Member
Apr 14, 2007
14,757
877
73
Ontario, Canada
✟22,726.00
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
*rolls eyes* Fine, if you want to play semantics... PARTS of the Bible, noteably those attributed to Christ, are the words of God.

The rest is the word of men.

That is just not the truth. Every word in the Bible is God-breathed.

You don't have to believe it, but it is so just the same.
 
Upvote 0

Jet_A_Jockey

Jet+Jetslove=2gether4ever :)
Site Supporter
Mar 9, 2006
11,279
1,082
hurricane central
Visit site
✟62,391.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married

Just thought I"d requote this since no one addressed it. Is it not relevant?
 
Reactions: Floatingaxe
Upvote 0

EnemyPartyII

Well-Known Member
Sep 12, 2006
11,524
893
39
✟20,084.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
In Relationship
Greek, "koit" is the direct derivative to "coitus", sexual intercourse. "Arsenokoitai" definitely refers to a male having sexual intercourse with another male.

How convenient to ignore the obvious...
"coitus" derives from "koit"... you have it backwards.
 
Upvote 0

EnemyPartyII

Well-Known Member
Sep 12, 2006
11,524
893
39
✟20,084.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
In Relationship
2 timothy 3:16 , don't pick this apart please.


And on the masturbation subject, that is a very broad word also, and could mean anything outside of standard sexual intercourse (the kind that gets ya pregnant, ya know?)
I wasn't the poster refering to masturbation.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.