PsychoSarah
Chaotic Neutral
Actually, I looked at another thread, and RickG did actually already show you them, and you, in quick fashion, completely disregarded them without really showing valid evidence to back that outlook.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Ha. Careful before spouting the bravado next time.
He would need more than a cheap attempt at tossing out big words that might fool the uninitiated to make a case. Ever wonder why he didn't flesh out one or two for us there? It is just pious baloney.Actually, I looked at another thread, and RickG did actually already show you them, and you, in quick fashion, completely disregarded them without really showing valid evidence to back that outlook.
So each day for Assyria was eons? How about Jesus being dead 3 days? How about a morning and evening?Because they are older than 6,000 years. The days in Genesis are not 24 hour periods of time , but eons. The Assyrian empire was here long before Adam - see Ezekiel chapter 31 -
The Assyrians kept records of the King lines as well as other information regarding their movements and family records, They have thousands upon thousands of papyrus scrolls as well as thin highly baked clay plates, stacked rack upon rack upon rack in the British Museum to this day. Their histories are recorded in "everlastings", which are in 12,000 year periods.
So, from one everlasting to another everlasting is 12,000 years.
Counting back six everlastings, they come the the "Mantavera" which was the great upheaval and devastation of the great battle of the "Chaos monster" Lucifer and the great God of the universe "Murdock".
No. The war in revelation was something yet to come. Not ancient history.This jives with the war in heaven between Michael and his angels against Satan and his angels and Satan did not prevail.
In your dreams maybe.This was recorded as being 72,000 years ago.
You reevaluate what you were taught! It needs it something fierce.Unless your thinking is out of whack, you must then re-evaluate things you have been taught.
He would need more than a cheap attempt at tossing out big words that might fool the uninitiated to make a case. Ever wonder why he didn't flesh out one or two for us there? It is just pious baloney.
BTW AV, do you know where creationist get the information about problems in dating methods? They get them from dating method textbooks, which with every method discussed is a section that specifically that points out problems that can be encountered and how to avoid them, as well as limitations of the method. That is the section creationists like to "quote mine" and misrepresent.
I think the question you and all creationists need to be asking is, "Why do they deliberately misrepresent information concerning dating methods?" Really! It is so obvious to those of us who have the training and experience with them.
How do you think I grabbed two things he listed, and slew them on the altar?Would it have killed you to have perhaps plugged those terms in a search engine? I will give you a chance to do that and investigate them for yourself, but if you won't I will define them and you are going to feel like such a tool for disregarding them so quickly.
Bah...sour grapes. Just because God's people won't swallow your religion is no reason to get nasty!Why do they do it?
Denial, confirmation bias and selective reasoning. All driven by, cognitive dissonance.
How do you think I grabbed two things he listed, and slew them on the altar?
AV has an idea regarding embedded age, which he uses to explain how the Earth can be billions of years old while only having existed for 6000 years. Apparently it involves age being something that can be put into an object, somehow.
Now, I have a question about how all this works.
Firstly, AV has said that the embedding of age into the universe happened in creation week.
Secondly, AV has said that fossils came AFTER creation week.
However, that means that age could not have been embedded into fossils because they came about after the process of age embedding had finished.
My question is this: if age has not been embedded into fossils (as per the two points above), why do they date to be much older than 6000 years?
I call it rubbish for good reasons....none of those things help his case.By seeing big word, and just calling it rubbish for not real reason nor backing up why.
I call it rubbish for good reasons....none of those things help his case.
Take any one you like and explain it and how it applies to the far universe or past state!Elaborate, in a way that shows me you understand the terms.
Either way is an argument of deception. There is no biblical foundation for either scenario. The problem is easily solved when the genesis creation story is viewed as not being literal as most Christians do.
The scientific knowledge we have is what it is. Choosing what one likes and ignoring the rest is an exercise of conformation bias. In the scientific community it is called intellectual dishonesty.
Differences in carbon 14 do not mean that the differences resulted from our nature.
Same reason that a living mollusk has been carbon dated by the C-14 method as 10,000 years old dead. Fallible devices run by fallible men.
Take any one you like and explain it and how it applies to the far universe or past state!
All smoke no fire.
Careful. Judge not les ye be judged. That line of judgment can be said of your side of the discussion.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?