There are tons of other examples if you want them. For example, all apes, including humans, have the same mutation in our GULO gene that is responsible for vitamin C synthesis which results in none of the apes being able to produce their own vitamin C. Why would we all have the same exact mutation, unless the mutation happened once in a common ancestor?
I would rather have you explain how an offspring can acquire a trait for which it parents had no gene for. If you cn do that there will some u se in coninuing. If not, we might as well part company in this discussion
My explanatin is that that is how God created humans and apes and any other being with the same things.
What brain size would a transitional fossil need? What cranial features would a transitional need? You need to be more specific.
The must be some kind of evidence that whatever apes evolved freom that showed an increase in skull size from them to apes to humans. Why do humans and apes have different skull sizes? Why has only one ape classification acdquiried the ability to speak in complex languages, plural?
Why are real apes not classified as homo sapian.
Repeating my words back to me is not an argument. What features would a fossil need in order for YOU to accept it as transitional?
You can use one fossil to prove evolution and most hard core evolutionists acknowlege the fossil record does not prove evolution. You need several fossils from A to B that show small changes until you come to the final one. You do not have any of those. Even your whale evolution chart only had 1 or 2 fossils until it became the next link in the chain. That is not acceptable and it certainly isn't scientific.
What shared genetic marker would you accept as evidence of common ancestry between humans and other apes?
The same basic quesion: What was an ape before it was an ape and how did apes acquire its traits from parents that did not have a gene for?
Or will you reject any DNA comparison and any fossil as evidence?
The only DNA comparison you have is the both have DNA. DNA cannot be used biologically to link species. It can only be use to distinguish one from the other. It an be used to distinguish between different species of apes. If we were apes, we could mate with them. WE are not apes based on DNA. I canot understand why that is so hard for some to understand.
You also can't use one fossil as evidence. You must have several with small changes and you must also provide the genetric evidende that cause these changes.
I already demonstrated, with ERV's and other genetic evidence, that humans and other apes share a common ancestor.
You hvae not. YOu have shown that there are some common similarities. That is not evidence. I can just as easy say God creaed them that way.
>>What features would a fossil need to have in order for you to accept it as being transitional between whales and terrestrial mammals? Or will you reject any and all evidence?<<
Again lets start with one basic: What caused packicetus to to lose it legs and nose?
I dont reject any real scientific evidence. If you can explain the above quesiton, I will not ony jump on the evo wagon, I will pull it for you. Don't forget, the explanation must include how it is possible genetically.
Good luck.
Already have multiple times. The ERV evidence can be found above.