Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Tell me, Steve, what exactly does a single misspelled word say about a person to you? I get that it would mean they don't have common sense in your mind...anything else?
And if you like, I can get into what indicates small mindedness to me, and how people will say the darnedest things when they have no other defense.
Like I said, some people don't like the term, and pretty sure that's because it gets in the way of their agenda. but going so far as to call it a meaningless term is a pretty far fetched way to try to make it go away.
Always tickles me how Atheists like to redefine words, but removing their meaning all together, is a new one on me.
No, that will be enough.....you've demonstrated your limitations sufficiently.....
No,it's meaningless because there's nothing 'common' about it and people will disagree as to whether it makes 'sense'....try to pay attention.
My, sharp tonight, lol
Maybe you can get them to remove the term from the dictionary? Let me know how that goes.
From Wikipedia:Yes, DNA
Instructions imply an instructor.Deoxyribonucleic acid is a molecule that carries the genetic instructions used in the growth, development, functioning and reproduction of all known living organisms and many viruses.
How did a process involving random mutations where the extremely rare random mutation that is considered as beneficial create such a complex code?
Technically, to answer DNA is to beg the question since it is assuming that DNA arose from Natural Selection in a purely Naturalistic Materialist world. I assume the OP is inferring this is not the case.
For DNA to satisfy, it would therefore require us to show that its existance began independant of a creator in entirety or has always existed.
This is a tall order and frankly not possible to show.
For even if the initial event solely was due to such a being, the rest arising materialistically, all else would still follow from this first act.
The question as I understand it, rather asks this to either support DNA possibly being such a type of code or to undermine it if no other example can be given.
I would rather suggest Crystallisation or atomic energy states, although the idea of it being 'information filled code' is less clear cut.
What does these mutations do?
Why is DNA not a(?) code?
Because in reality, it's just a complex molecule involved in a gigantic chemical chain reaction.
DNA is not a code because that title is not convenient at the moment.
I've gone on in the past about the human eye as a for instance of being something so complicated, it could never come about on it's own
Over the last several months, I've found that some don't like the use of common sense, they prefer evidence
, even though common sense is one thing that allows us to see evidence.
Though, for some, common sense may not tell what is most likely to be, it should at least tell them what is not likely to be
, and it is so unlikely something so introkit as DNA came about without intelligence, or even that the odds are astronomical,
they are simply impossible.
At least that's what common sense tells me.
Maybe.From Wikipedia:
Instructions imply an instructor.
It has everything to do with science, religion, the visible and the invisible. The common sense that men have today will be destroyed soon. Then a new "common sense" will be discovered by all God's people but all of us will agree that we're not real people living in a real universe. Many scientists are beginning to believe this today.
Is that more or is it less complex than a code?
The Tree of Life that has been hidden from man since man woke up in a world is the computing technology that our Creator converted His thoughts with to make characters called people and beasts come alive on a simulated planet whirling around in a simulated universe. Very few scientists believe this might be possible but the Creator has been in contact with me in the Tree of Life for 37 years now. Once he got his characters to build the voice recognition software that computer programmers can use for speaking code ( thoughts converted to computer language ) into and build computer simulation games, it is what he needed to help me understand how he was able to take his thoughts and speak them into a simulation program called Eternal Life where all the characters will experience life forever.
Is that more or is it less complex than a code?
The truth of how we were created is very scary to most people.
And I'm sure people have lectured you in response to those rants, explaining how the evolution of the eye is actually very well understood.
Evidence trumps "common sense". Because one doesn't know what is sensible in advance.
"Common sense" didn't include the relativity of time.
"Common sense" didn't include black holes.
"Common sense" didn't include quantum mechanics.
New discoveries, more often then not, defy our common sense.
False. Common sense allows to draw sensible conclusions based on the knowledge we actually have. Common sense can't account for the things we do not know.
If you do not know what paper is, then common sense will be useless until you understand the nature of paper.
Arguments from incredulity, ignorance and complexity, are fallacious.
This claim requires evidence.
And I have just explained rather extensively why common sense is not usefull regarding things you do not know.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?