• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,552
52,498
Guam
✟5,126,425.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
The oldest exposed rock on the Earth would be Keith Richards, correct?
But he is only 71 years old?

Still thinking. What about Led Zepplin?

Hold on a minute. This whole matter of the age of the Earth was settled around about the same time that ELVIS (the soon to become King of Rock 'n Roll) recorded with SUN RECORDS.
Good on yer Clair Patterson!
QV please:
-- this thread will be for serious discussion.
Didn't you ask me to vacate the thread when I was answering honestly and to the best of my ability?
 
Upvote 0

lewiscalledhimmaster

georgemacdonald.info
Nov 8, 2012
2,499
56
67
Scotland
Visit site
✟60,423.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Private
Politics
UK-Greens
Didn't you ask me to vacate the thread when I was answering honestly and to the best of my ability?

I don't recall doing that.
You asked me what the question in my OP was -- I replied. (here)
You said 'I'm not that complicated' - I said, 'Well. You know what to do'
I guess, you didn't get the picture of the girl in an easy chair -- relaxing. (here)

Now if you don't mind, I have some chicks to attend to: (link to follow: here)
 
Upvote 0

lewiscalledhimmaster

georgemacdonald.info
Nov 8, 2012
2,499
56
67
Scotland
Visit site
✟60,423.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Private
Politics
UK-Greens

Believe it or not, they'd probably understand you perfectly -- but I kept on thinking about chicks -- Beavis and Butthead an I.
Thanks for the effort, I think I'm beginning to get it.
It's exactly what I was reading about.
So this RADIOMETRIC DATING.
Nice.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,552
52,498
Guam
✟5,126,425.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Now if you don't mind, I have some chicks to attend to: (link to follow:
Which brings up a second point.

Didn't you say this in your OP?
No links, no quotes, only simple explanations by you.
You even underlined it.

I have a feeling there's more to why this thread was started than meets the eye.

If I'm wrong, then perhaps you can tell me what you have learned from the responses?

You asked for each one of us to respond with our own favorite method of calculating the age of the earth.

As of this post, Freodin has three replies -- what is Freodin's favorite method of calculating the age of the earth?

As of this post, whois has two replies -- what is whois' favorite method of calculating the age of the earth?

As of this post, essentialsaltes has two replies -- what is essentialsaltes' favorite method of calculating the age of the earth?

As of this post, Juvenissun has one reply -- what is Juvenissun's favorite method of calculating the age of the earth?

What exactly have you learned?

Or are you just providing us with your brand of "entertainment value" that you conveniently mentioned in your own OP?
 
Upvote 0

lewiscalledhimmaster

georgemacdonald.info
Nov 8, 2012
2,499
56
67
Scotland
Visit site
✟60,423.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Private
Politics
UK-Greens
<edit>

Several radiometric dating methods involve half-lives in the billions of years. They give consistent answers that the objects in the solar system (including the earth) are 4.5 billion years old.

What's the deal with people like say the well known Dr. Neil Tyson-DeGrasse and Co. (astrophysicists) who do this in a slightly different way -- something about the PULSATING STARS?
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,552
52,498
Guam
✟5,126,425.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,552
52,498
Guam
✟5,126,425.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Correct, Charlie.

Well, for the record, I don't see you pushing too hard for answers to your OP.

Essentialsaltes has, in my opinion, respected your OP -- albeit he didn't say if it was his favorite or not.

Then all of a sudden, you start waxing comical in a thread you started for serious replies with simple ways of explaining them.

But hey, if you don't care, I don't care either.
 
Upvote 0

whois

rational
Mar 7, 2015
2,523
119
✟3,336.00
Faith
Non-Denom
now that was a darned good explanation.
but . . . (wouldn't you know it)
the above only applies if the box always remains locked.
IOW you don't know if other isoducks has been snuck into the box.
in the real world this is known as leeching and cannot be stopped.
 
Upvote 0

lewiscalledhimmaster

georgemacdonald.info
Nov 8, 2012
2,499
56
67
Scotland
Visit site
✟60,423.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Private
Politics
UK-Greens
Then all of a sudden, you start waxing comical in a thread you started for serious replies with simple ways of explaining them.

I think my comments were awesome!

Keith Richard - step one in determining the age of the earth: search for and date the oldest exposed rocks on the Earth. (16)
Led Zepplin - an elegant model for the evolution of lead isotopes. (18)
and Elvis Presley -- for Clair Patterson and he both made major discoveries in 1953 - well, Elvis was discovered @ Sun Records (19)

Forgive me for a having a little fun -- but you go on right ahead and do what you always do. You know, necro-threads. Good luck with that.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
41,778
44,873
Los Angeles Area
✟999,702.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)

I imagine the most likely thing is that argon would leach out of rocks, and make rocks look younger than they actually are.

But in any case, this and many other methods have been used on many different samples. If leaching is causing all sorts of problems, why do these different methods involving different elements all yield the same answer for the maximum rock age? Why do they cluster around 4.5 billion years ago as the maximal age or earth rocks? Meteorites are in space, nothing can leach into them. Why do they also consistently give that same age of 4.5 billion years?

Is it all a coincidence that multiple faulty methods give the same result? It is just not plausible.
 
Reactions: Astrophile
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
41,778
44,873
Los Angeles Area
✟999,702.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
What's the deal with people like say the well known Dr. Neil Tyson-DeGrasse and Co. (astrophysicists) who do this in a slightly different way -- something about the PULSATING STARS?

Your original question, when finally provided, was: "Question: Please explain how you would calculate the age of the Earth?" [my emphasis]

I'm not sure pulsars can do that.
 
Upvote 0

lewiscalledhimmaster

georgemacdonald.info
Nov 8, 2012
2,499
56
67
Scotland
Visit site
✟60,423.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Private
Politics
UK-Greens
Your original question, when finally provided, was: "Question: Please explain how you would calculate the age of the Earth?" [my emphasis]

I'm not sure pulsars can do that.

My bad. My imagination is running away with me. It's such an interesting topic. I shall endeavor to stay focused.

I'm not sure either, but then I've only recently read of Henrietta Leavitt's discovery in 1908 -- and something called 'period-luminosity relation'
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,552
52,498
Guam
✟5,126,425.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Forgive me for a having a little fun --
I'll say this again (but I'm getting tired of hearing myself whine about it):

You set the rules in your OP; viz., be serious and no links.

Then you not only violate your own rules, but don't seem to care about others who aren't answering your OP.

(Except when I posted, of course.)

But as I said, I'm getting tired of hearing myself whine about it.

It's your thread, not mine.
 
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
41,778
44,873
Los Angeles Area
✟999,702.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
I'm not sure either, but then I've only recently read of Henrietta Leavitt's discovery in 1908 -- and something called 'period-luminosity relation'

Aha, that is for variable stars. This is one of the great ways of calculating astronomical distances.

[And since it takes light time to travel those astronomical distances, it can tell us something about how long ago the light we see now took to travel from the star to us. But again this does not tell us anything about the earth's age. But it would set some lower bounds for the age of the variable stars we see, and consequently the age the universe that contains those stars.]
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,552
52,498
Guam
✟5,126,425.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Lewis, all joking aside, I want to thank you for giving these guys a chance to talk about their favorite method of calculating the age of the earth, as well as a chance to explain it in such a way as a child could understand it.

You would think people here would be falling over themselves to present their methods of choice; but as it turns out ...
 
Upvote 0

whois

rational
Mar 7, 2015
2,523
119
✟3,336.00
Faith
Non-Denom
i've run across an excellent treatise on radiometric dating.
not quite fit for a 5 year old, but:
naturalselection.0catch.com/Files/radiometricdating.html#Assumptions
 
Upvote 0

Oncedeceived

Senior Veteran
Jul 11, 2003
21,214
629
✟66,870.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kjxSCAalsBE
 
Upvote 0