Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Ethics & Morality
Why group marriage is the next horizon of social liberalism.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dgiharris" data-source="post: 68194598" data-attributes="member: 322579"><p>You got it.</p><p></p><p>Basically, you want to make sure there is no loop-hole incentive for group marriage that deprives the state of revenue and/or puts undo burden on the State and businesses. Take for instance, health insurance.</p><p></p><p>There are a lot of policies out there that automatically extend health insurance coverage to a spouse. However, lets say that applied to multiple spouses. What would stop someone from "marrying" 15 people each with serious health issues just so that their insurance has to cover each spouse.</p><p></p><p>The counter to this would be for health insurance coverage to be fixed at a certain amount that does not increase as you add spouses. This way, you can't game the system...</p><p></p><p>that is the sort of protection I have in mind, basically, make it to where you can't game the system with group marriage with tax benefits or other benefits that a married couple enjoy. <strong>Essentially you normalize the benefits setting your benefit equation to two people.</strong> Whether it be tax deductions or whatever, you make it to where group marriage isn't a means to game the system...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I have my moments <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite7" alt=":p" title="Stick Out Tongue :p" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":p" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dgiharris, post: 68194598, member: 322579"] You got it. Basically, you want to make sure there is no loop-hole incentive for group marriage that deprives the state of revenue and/or puts undo burden on the State and businesses. Take for instance, health insurance. There are a lot of policies out there that automatically extend health insurance coverage to a spouse. However, lets say that applied to multiple spouses. What would stop someone from "marrying" 15 people each with serious health issues just so that their insurance has to cover each spouse. The counter to this would be for health insurance coverage to be fixed at a certain amount that does not increase as you add spouses. This way, you can't game the system... that is the sort of protection I have in mind, basically, make it to where you can't game the system with group marriage with tax benefits or other benefits that a married couple enjoy. [B]Essentially you normalize the benefits setting your benefit equation to two people.[/B] Whether it be tax deductions or whatever, you make it to where group marriage isn't a means to game the system... I have my moments :P [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Ethics & Morality
Why group marriage is the next horizon of social liberalism.
Top
Bottom