Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Ethics & Morality
Why group marriage is the next horizon of social liberalism.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bfdd6988" data-source="post: 68193839" data-attributes="member: 373233"><p><a href="http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/06/gay-marriage-decision-polygamy-119469_Page2.html#.VY4vQ_mqqkp" target="_blank">http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/06/gay-marriage-decision-polygamy-119469_Page2.html#.VY4vQ_mqqkp</a></p><p></p><p>I credit this author for admitting to the very real slippery slope consequence now created because of the SCOTUS decision yesterday. It's incumbent upon the person who supports ssm but not polygamy to show how he's not being a hypocrite when supposedly marriage is "all about love" and nothing else. Why do I say "all about love"? I say this because for years, one very popular mantra of ssm supporters was "don't tell me who I can love"--as if anyone were! Since SCOTUS decision, an equally popular mantra is "love wins". Therefore, love, and only love, appears to be the only criteria for ssm supporters and ought to be for supporters of polygamy.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bfdd6988, post: 68193839, member: 373233"] [URL]http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/06/gay-marriage-decision-polygamy-119469_Page2.html#.VY4vQ_mqqkp[/URL] I credit this author for admitting to the very real slippery slope consequence now created because of the SCOTUS decision yesterday. It's incumbent upon the person who supports ssm but not polygamy to show how he's not being a hypocrite when supposedly marriage is "all about love" and nothing else. Why do I say "all about love"? I say this because for years, one very popular mantra of ssm supporters was "don't tell me who I can love"--as if anyone were! Since SCOTUS decision, an equally popular mantra is "love wins". Therefore, love, and only love, appears to be the only criteria for ssm supporters and ought to be for supporters of polygamy. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Ethics & Morality
Why group marriage is the next horizon of social liberalism.
Top
Bottom