Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Twitter user Douglass Mackey sentenced to 7 months in prison after being found guilty of election interference for making memes disparaging Hillary
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ThatRobGuy" data-source="post: 77422371" data-attributes="member: 123415"><p>That's actually a separate conversation...</p><p></p><p>But for the record, I was critical of the fact that government actors were putting, what I felt, was pressure on social media outlets to hide the NY Post story.</p><p></p><p>That being said, someone opting not to allow something on a platform isn't the same as taking a proactive dishonest action.</p><p></p><p>For instance, if I was someone who was against concealed carry, there's a huge difference between</p><p>"I'm not going publish/advertise what the process is because I don't want people to do it"</p><p>vs.</p><p>"I'm going to blast text 50,000 people and falsely tell them that there's constitutional carry in their jurisdiction (when there isn't) so that they get in trouble"</p><p></p><p></p><p>Or perhaps a better way to boil it down to its base elements:</p><p>It's the difference between refusing to talk about something vs. lying. (our legal system makes that distinction too)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ThatRobGuy, post: 77422371, member: 123415"] That's actually a separate conversation... But for the record, I was critical of the fact that government actors were putting, what I felt, was pressure on social media outlets to hide the NY Post story. That being said, someone opting not to allow something on a platform isn't the same as taking a proactive dishonest action. For instance, if I was someone who was against concealed carry, there's a huge difference between "I'm not going publish/advertise what the process is because I don't want people to do it" vs. "I'm going to blast text 50,000 people and falsely tell them that there's constitutional carry in their jurisdiction (when there isn't) so that they get in trouble" Or perhaps a better way to boil it down to its base elements: It's the difference between refusing to talk about something vs. lying. (our legal system makes that distinction too) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Twitter user Douglass Mackey sentenced to 7 months in prison after being found guilty of election interference for making memes disparaging Hillary
Top
Bottom