A2SG
Gumby
- Jun 17, 2008
- 7,684
- 2,508
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Other Religion
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Democrat
Maybe not those specific pronouns, but it seems to me there have been a lot of posts that purport to claim some overreaching "trans agenda" that seems to begin with pronouns and ends, somehow, with world domination or something.I haven't seen anyone scaremongering about zir/xem/cake/cat pronouns here.
Or, I dunno, maybe I just don't get how trans people using bathrooms is a disaster for society.
And I know literally nothing else. So, what about her?I just told you something about her.
What problems, exactly? And what do you suggest as a solution for those problems?If the plumber or bagger commit a serious crime they will go to a prison that correlates with their sex. If a transwoman goes to prison they have the potential to be sent to a women's prison where they can cause problems for the female inmates, as has already happened.
And why should that solution involve any trans person who hasn't been arrested or incarcerated?
I'm sure you do.I see that as going forwards.
I don't support anything of the kind. If you're uncomfortable about that...or anything at all...that's your problem to deal with. Unless the person using the bathroom is committing a crime or directly causing a problem of some sort (for the record, I don't consider you being uncomfortable that the other person exists to be a problem they directly caused), I would support a "live and let live" approach.No one is asking you to make it your responsibility to ensure everyone is comfortable all the time, just that you support the majority of people who are uncomfortable at the idea of having biological men in women's spaces.
I seem to remember, not that long ago, being in the men's room of a Target (or some such place) where a woman came in with her toddler son to let him go to the bathroom. She explained that the women's room was full (not that I asked). It didn't bother me at all.
Maybe so...but knowing nothing whatsoever would only elicit an ignorant, uninformed opinion. I would need to know something about them to have an informed opinion. Oh, and I'd probably need to care a tiny little bit as well.You don't need to know them to have an opinion on them.
Okay.I don't know Clint Eastwood. I'm not a actor, so I don't know how well they can act. But if someone asked me if it was okay for Clint Eastwood to play a specific role, I would say yes.
See above. I still don't see any reason why I should care one way or the other.So would you be okay with Stefonknee Wolscht playing with little children in a swimming pool or Rachel Dolezal starring as a black historical figure in a movie? Yes or no.
Shocking, I know.Other people lie?!
Oh wow!! That's never happened before, ever in the history of humanity!!!!!It's a deliberate attempt to spread false information about a minority.
I'd say the impeding has been greatly exaggerated. To a massive degree.Trans ideology impeding other people's lives.
But, I willingly admit, that's my opinion.
Who should or should not occupy biological women's spaces isn't something I get to decide; plus which, my opinion on the subject is less than worthless, and not in any way needed or wanted.Yet you can't bring yourself to say "Trans women are not biological woman and therefore should not occupy biological women's spaces". A phrase that doesn't conflict with either of those two facts.
But my dream job. Thing is, I'm not looking for a job as a professional oath taker, it's not my field. Plus which, I already have a job.Because I said it required that. My hypothetical, remember.
Thing is, people can have medical procedures that alter their body in a way that allows them to live as their preferred sex. If that's good enough for them, it's certainly good enough for me.So you randomly decided to bring up a random celebrity just to tell me they may or may not agree with me about sex being unchangeable.
You know who else might disagree with me? Anyone.
If you want to debate whether or not those medical procedures are sufficient to allow a complete, 100% alteration to a different sex, you'll have to take it up with someone who has sufficient medical knowledge to discuss the subject. That ain't me.
Pronoun usage.Which is?
They can do that if they want to, with or without my advising them. Further, if they feel they are being harassed at work, they have the right to speak to HR about that, and have HR deal with the issue. And that goes for everyone, trans or otherwise.That should be your advice to trans people when others refuse to use their pronouns.
What's apparent to you is your concern, not mine. I know what matters to me better than you do.It seems apparent to me in this last post that other people's suffering doesn't matter to you unless it's trans people.
True. I can always guess.You don't need to work in HR to come up with a possible solution.
I guessed.Wait, I thought you didn't work in HR? How did you come up with that possible solution?
-- A2SG, see how that works?
Last edited:
Upvote
0