Matthew you must see the truth...
Jesus wasn't 6'2", he couldn't have been. As the average middle eastern man was just above 5ft tall...
Also, as was mentioned earlier. His head was covered with a seperate piece than the shroud was... His body was covered with a shroud and his head was wrapped in a seperate piece of cloth, the shroud of turin shows otherwise and is thus contradictory to scripture.
Yes I know leaves and such were found from Jesus' area. But that doesn't prevent some one from travelling down there and getting the cloth and plants from there now does it?
They also say that the spear and nails were imprinted on the shroud. But there is no evidence nor mention of them being in his tomb and buried with him.
It shows Jesus as having a stronger right arm... However he wouldn't have had much muscle on his right arm as he had been ministering for 3 years and muscle doesn't stay strong like the shroud shows... I personally lost my muscle in my arms after 3 months of not weight lifting and working out.
His hands aren't in the position that if he were dead, that they would be in... It shows he was nailed through the wrists (historically accuract) but his hands (fingers and palm) don't show much like he had been nailed.
That illustration originally came from a physician. (and has danced through the internet since then)
The so-called nail imprint on the shroud actually closer resembles a modern railroad tie nail.
Of course railroads didn't exist till about the mid 19th century...
But thats beside the point, the nail on the shroud isn't consistant with historical nails, and if you compare that to the hands and blood, there isn't nearly the amount of blood that would have existed had he been nailed with it.
Jesus wasn't 6'2", he couldn't have been. As the average middle eastern man was just above 5ft tall...
Also, as was mentioned earlier. His head was covered with a seperate piece than the shroud was... His body was covered with a shroud and his head was wrapped in a seperate piece of cloth, the shroud of turin shows otherwise and is thus contradictory to scripture.
Yes I know leaves and such were found from Jesus' area. But that doesn't prevent some one from travelling down there and getting the cloth and plants from there now does it?
They also say that the spear and nails were imprinted on the shroud. But there is no evidence nor mention of them being in his tomb and buried with him.
It shows Jesus as having a stronger right arm... However he wouldn't have had much muscle on his right arm as he had been ministering for 3 years and muscle doesn't stay strong like the shroud shows... I personally lost my muscle in my arms after 3 months of not weight lifting and working out.
His hands aren't in the position that if he were dead, that they would be in... It shows he was nailed through the wrists (historically accuract) but his hands (fingers and palm) don't show much like he had been nailed.
That illustration originally came from a physician. (and has danced through the internet since then)
The so-called nail imprint on the shroud actually closer resembles a modern railroad tie nail.
Of course railroads didn't exist till about the mid 19th century...
But thats beside the point, the nail on the shroud isn't consistant with historical nails, and if you compare that to the hands and blood, there isn't nearly the amount of blood that would have existed had he been nailed with it.
Upvote
0
