Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
The myth of the "Nested Hierarchy of Common Descent"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="lifepsyop" data-source="post: 68193128" data-attributes="member: 346110"><p>Evolutionists say that phylogenetics point to the trait as being non-homologous, and not an "atavism". Not only do you have no homology argument, but you are now fighting against the peer-reviewed literature of the evolutionary community. You really do manage to twist yourself into knots. </p><p></p><p>You know, it's okay to admit when you're wrong.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="lifepsyop, post: 68193128, member: 346110"] Evolutionists say that phylogenetics point to the trait as being non-homologous, and not an "atavism". Not only do you have no homology argument, but you are now fighting against the peer-reviewed literature of the evolutionary community. You really do manage to twist yourself into knots. You know, it's okay to admit when you're wrong. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
The myth of the "Nested Hierarchy of Common Descent"
Top
Bottom