Are our teeth the same? their eyes certainly look like ours.
Precisely. They have this vestigial thingy and expect a universal adherence to the catch. Seeing that vestigial structures do not serve the
original function, our eyes used to be fish eyes, that was the
original function. Slightly different to help fish see underwater. But now they're human eyes. Teeth used to dinosaur teeth, the
original function was to help dinosaur eat, now in humans, slightly different, they are vestigial because the
original function is lost.
In fact, not just the structures you have stated but the entire human is vestigial. You just pick a structure, mix and match, speculate, then edit Wikipedia's complementary page.
It reminds me of the Ram Air Turbine (RAT) in aircraft. Its like a little propeller on the underside of the airplane which deploys to provide limited electrical and hydraulic power during a flame out. For the sake of emulation.
It was designed that way. But unless there is a loss of power, its function is minuscule to nil. In Carwinism however, it is clearly vestigial. It doesnt serve its
original function, which is to act as the main powerplant in props and turboprops.
So, when it serves a function, it is evidence. If it doesnt serve a function, it is evidence. All this dancing and humbuggery is completely irrelevant though seeing tests show that a car cannot turn into a 757.
-- When I get sick, I don't know if I'm supposed to go to a doctor, or a veterinarian -- (or even what the difference is).
