Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
The Blind Atheist: The Unscientific Root of Atheism
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RFHendrix" data-source="post: 1088373" data-attributes="member: 14195"><p>Well the problem is we cannot obtain the same type of information from an underected source that we can from a directed one in all cases. Yes, a machine can type this sentence but it cannot intelligently answer it unless there has been intelligent input. That is the essence of language that is not duplicated by any random process. A parot says a lot of things that could be determined to be the result of intelligent input if we are not careful but two parrots carrying on an extended conversation would prove that there was more than a random process involved. If there is no way to prove that intelligent life exists then why are people trying to find radio signals in space in order to find intelligent life? Coded communication determines the input of intelligence.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RFHendrix, post: 1088373, member: 14195"] Well the problem is we cannot obtain the same type of information from an underected source that we can from a directed one in all cases. Yes, a machine can type this sentence but it cannot intelligently answer it unless there has been intelligent input. That is the essence of language that is not duplicated by any random process. A parot says a lot of things that could be determined to be the result of intelligent input if we are not careful but two parrots carrying on an extended conversation would prove that there was more than a random process involved. If there is no way to prove that intelligent life exists then why are people trying to find radio signals in space in order to find intelligent life? Coded communication determines the input of intelligence. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
The Blind Atheist: The Unscientific Root of Atheism
Top
Bottom