Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
The Blind Atheist: The Unscientific Root of Atheism
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="notto" data-source="post: 1088172" data-attributes="member: 2918"><p>LOL!</p><p> </p><p> But apparently you can't explain it to me.</p><p> </p><p> How does a spliced gene react in a new genome? Does it act the way we would predict based on its molecular makeup? YEP! </p><p> </p><p> Basically you are saying that anytime a chemical reaction happens something is "reading information" to tell it how to react with another chemical.</p><p> </p><p> I guess every reaction is intelligently designed, right down to burning wood, water forming, and I guess inert compounds simply "communicate" a message of "don't react with me, even though you couldn't if you tried".</p><p> </p><p> Your argument is simplistic, has no predictive power (can you provide a prediction from your conclusion that can be tested?), and does nothing to explain the evidence any better than mainstream theories. </p><p> </p><p> You just took the shortcut, jumped to an early conclusion, and said "God did it!".</p><p> </p><p> Poor science.</p><p> </p><p> Did you submit your publication to peer review? Who reviewed it? What is there backgroud? What did they say?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="notto, post: 1088172, member: 2918"] LOL! But apparently you can't explain it to me. How does a spliced gene react in a new genome? Does it act the way we would predict based on its molecular makeup? YEP! Basically you are saying that anytime a chemical reaction happens something is "reading information" to tell it how to react with another chemical. I guess every reaction is intelligently designed, right down to burning wood, water forming, and I guess inert compounds simply "communicate" a message of "don't react with me, even though you couldn't if you tried". Your argument is simplistic, has no predictive power (can you provide a prediction from your conclusion that can be tested?), and does nothing to explain the evidence any better than mainstream theories. You just took the shortcut, jumped to an early conclusion, and said "God did it!". Poor science. Did you submit your publication to peer review? Who reviewed it? What is there backgroud? What did they say? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
The Blind Atheist: The Unscientific Root of Atheism
Top
Bottom