helmut
Member
Let's look for answers.
1 If there’s only one shooter, why did so many eyewitnesses report multiple shooters at the scene?
- Are there really "many" eyewitness that said so? I remember the fake "loose change" video, which distorted the reports of eyewitnesses, up to the point that a man describing how the airplane he saw crashed into the pentagon and then was no plane, but rubble, was only quoted with his last sentence "There was no plane", creating the assumption he saw no plane. No, I don't believe everything a man with agenda tells on the internet.
- Witnesses may be wrong. They don't anticipate moves of the shooter and so think he is more than one person. Or mistake echoes for real shots and so report shooting from multiple direction, hence multiple shooters.
Well, it is police routine to arrest suspects that turn out innocent. Better than to leave suspects in the wild that turn out to be the very criminal they looked for.2) Why did the local police arrest and hold three suspects in custody, as was widely reported by the media before the story was changed to a “lone shooter?”
It was in the USSR, where several decades ago a first draft of a code of criminal procedure did not mention the possibility that a suspect arrested and accused turned out innocent. You seem to have a similar strain of thought as those who made that draft.
Because much of what he writes are not his own words? I read enough of the Breivik manifesto (Oslo/Utøya shooter, 2011) to see that he quotes (with only few hints he is quoting) texts from other right wing internet activists, e.g. some "fordman". The el Paso shooter used thoughts from Trump, he may have used words from other people, too.3) Why does the so-called “manifesto” appear to be written by someone far older than 21 years of age?
And how do you determine the age of a poster? ?-)
Which photo?How does one man kill 20 people and wound another 30 people with a single magazine that only holds 30 rounds? The surveillance photo shows no chest rig, no battle belt and no spare magazines.
Because he wants to see and hear, in order to kill more people?If the shooter is on a suicide mission, why does he bother to wear both eye protection and ear protection?
If you go to a town where 80% are Mexicans, you will shoot at immigrants even in a shopping center.BONUS QUESTION: If you hate illegals and want to protect America, why would you mass murder Americans shopping in an American store?
You may consider someone with an American document (passport etc.) an American, the shooter did not, he only saw whites as true Americans. Maybe the eye protection allowed him to spare people of his "race"?
There are no questions that "blow" the story told by the police. The chances are definitely above zero that pages like the your link may push some people into radical ideas that end up with another shooting.
Upvote
0