Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
tactile sensory units, 2
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PsychoSarah" data-source="post: 67997877" data-attributes="member: 345531"><p>Mine was related to tactile sensory units. I want you to prove that your reasoning apparently working with tactile sensory units (in your opinion) isn't a fluke: prove it works with other things, and it will at least show that your method has consistent results. This is the only way to show that your method works, if you use only 1 example and refuse to apply a method to anything else, I can just disregard it as a fluke and I don't even have to point out flaws in it, because you won't put in the effort to show that your method actually works. Use your criteria for 2 other items, 1 complex, and 1 simple, you are free to choose (and I am being generous with that). Show that your criteria for created items works for both, and I will be satisfied. It isn't hard, it isn't off topic, and if you continue to refuse to provide evidence that your criteria aren't tailored to 1 example, then why should I make the effort of taking you seriously?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PsychoSarah, post: 67997877, member: 345531"] Mine was related to tactile sensory units. I want you to prove that your reasoning apparently working with tactile sensory units (in your opinion) isn't a fluke: prove it works with other things, and it will at least show that your method has consistent results. This is the only way to show that your method works, if you use only 1 example and refuse to apply a method to anything else, I can just disregard it as a fluke and I don't even have to point out flaws in it, because you won't put in the effort to show that your method actually works. Use your criteria for 2 other items, 1 complex, and 1 simple, you are free to choose (and I am being generous with that). Show that your criteria for created items works for both, and I will be satisfied. It isn't hard, it isn't off topic, and if you continue to refuse to provide evidence that your criteria aren't tailored to 1 example, then why should I make the effort of taking you seriously? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
tactile sensory units, 2
Top
Bottom