Validating the Abrahamic Covenant.
And thereby failing to fulfill his promise of immunity?
I reiterate: there was no Jewish empire. What makes you think there was one? True, Judaism was wide-spread, but so is Christianity nowadays. Do you really claim that there is a Christian empire?
I'd also like to point out your fallacy:
1) The Judaeo-Christian god is claimed to have ensured an empire for his believers
2) A (Judaeo-)Christian empire existed
3) Therefore, the Judaeo-Christian god intervened
4) Therefore, the Judaeo-Christian god exists
The fallacy here is that Correlation does not imply Causation. So, just because the Christians had an empire, does not mean it's the empire their god promised them.
Allah is the mood god of the Quraysh (?) tribe from which Mohammad was born
Do you mean 'moon'?
Brahman, or more correctly, Brahma is a Hindu god.
I beg to differ. ब्रह्म (
brahma) is the nominative singular, whilst ब्रह्मन् (
brahman) is the neuter plural. Since Brahman is considered to be a plurality of many thousands of deities, I would argue for the latter. However, both words are in popular usage, and we are just arguing semanitics.
Offensive and unjustified assertion. I posit that it is
your god who is the false idol. After all, the FSM came to me in a dream yesterday, and did tell me that AV1611VET would say, 'Both are false idols.', and wouldst in fact be referring to his own deity.
Do you see, via my lovely sarcasm, that your argument is both offensive and unjustified? Arguments that work both ways get us nowhere.