What scriptures do Baptists use to support sola scriptura? I'm working on an assignment, and would love your help!
Are the parts that I bolded key here? Is it the detachment from the worldly that this verse is used?BT said:1 Corinthians 2:9-13 But as it is written, Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them that love him. But God hath revealed them unto us by his Spirit: for the Spirit searcheth all things, yea, the deep things of God. For what man knoweth the things of a man, save the spirit of man which is in him? even so the things of God knoweth no man, but the Spirit of God. Now we have received, not the spirit of the world, but the spirit which is of God; that we might know the things that are freely given to us of God. Which things also we speak, not in the words which man's wisdom teacheth, but which the Holy Ghost teacheth; comparing spiritual things with spiritual.
Ah yes, one of my TMS verses! So scripture is useful, certainly, but the only thing?2 Timothy 3:16-17 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.
No problem.clskinner said:I just selected the two Pauline verses because it's for my Pauline class, which I forgot to mention. Please know too that I really am trying to understand, and so my questions are genuine.
Are the parts that I bolded key here? Is it the detachment from the worldly that this verse is used?
1 Corinthians 2:9-13 But as it is written, Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them that love him. But God hath revealed them unto us by his Spirit: for the Spirit searcheth all things, yea, the deep things of God. For what man knoweth the things of a man, save the spirit of man which is in him? even so the things of God knoweth no man, but the Spirit of God. Now we have received, not the spirit of the world, but the spirit which is of God; that we might know the things that are freely given to us of God. Which things also we speak, not in the words which man's wisdom teacheth, but which the Holy Ghost teacheth; comparing spiritual things with spiritual.
The key in this verse is "that the man of God may be perfect". Since we realize that only the Scriptures are perfect and were given by God for this purpose we reason that there is no other thing required to "perfect us", and so the Bible is our sole authority.Ah yes, one of my TMS verses! So scripture is useful, certainly, but the only thing?
Ok, that's where I thought it was going - separation of flesh & spirit. And so a Baptist would say that the only way in which the Holy Ghost can teach/speak (speak may be putting words into your mouth?) is through the Scriptures? This question actually speaks to the next verse as well - your "every word fthat proceeds from the mouth of God" example.BT said:"As it is written"
"The things which God has prepared for them that love Him"
" even so the things of God knoweth no man, but the Spirit of God."
I would say that it is the detachment from the flesh (and the worldly) that prompts this verse to be used. Separating that which is from man, from that which is from God. In keeping with the idea that we no longer walk in the flesh but now in the Spirit. God sent "through the spirit" those things which are "of God" so that we might know them and speak no longer "words which man's widsom teacheth" but that "which the Holy Ghost teacheth".
Huh, this isn't something I've heard before. But it's very interesting to me. Ah, that's for another day!The pivot-point comes when we look at the fullness of the temptation and see that Christ rose above the flesh (as we are called to do) and lived only by the Word of God. Which He used to defend and strengthen Himself, it was all that was needed (the bread was refused), for Christ to "live". Christ then as our example shows us sola scriptura...
Something like that. I'm trying to work on a project for my class (due tomorrow, nonetheless), and it's rarely as simple as a verse or two (thankfully!).Clear as mud?
The primary way the Spirit speaks to us is through the written word of God. There are other ways, but each and every thing that we think the Spirit might be saying must be compared to the written word. If the "revelation" we think we have received contradicts scripture, then it is bogus, it is either our own desires speaking to us or it is erroneous thinking or it even could be of the devil. Nothing that does not match with the Bible is from God, nothing. The Bible is the complete revelation of God for us at this time and it doesn't need embellishment or augmentation.clskinner said:Ok, that's where I thought it was going - separation of flesh & spirit. And so a Baptist would say that the only way in which the Holy Ghost can teach/speak (speak may be putting words into your mouth?) is through the Scriptures? This question actually speaks to the next verse as well - your "every word fthat proceeds from the mouth of God" example.
What I'm trying to figure out is where the Scriptures say that. Any ideas?lambslove said:The Bible is the complete revelation of God
Do you have an insights to share, Glorianna? I'd be grateful for any contributions.Glorianna said:I find this topic fascinating... I learnt all about it in RELS 160 (Introduction to Theology).
I know the Bible says the words, "word of God" 45 times, but it doesn't say "other commentaries" or "catechisms" even once!clskinner said:What I'm trying to figure out is where the Scriptures say that. Any ideas?
I'm not looking to argue this with you, Lambslove. I'm looking for scriptures that show a Baptist's belief in sola scriptura. Where in the Sacred Texts does it say that the scriptures contain the entirety of God's revelation, per your statement above?lambslove said:I know the Bible says the words, "word of God" 45 times, but it doesn't say "other commentaries" or "catechisms" even once!
Mark 7:13 says, "You cancel the effect of the word of God through your traditions which you have birthed, and many similar things, too."
It seems to me that Christ is saying NOT to make up traditions or follow cathechisms, but to do the word of God, because traditions and catechisms cancel the effect of the word of God, that is, they take the focus off following the teachings of Christ and put it on following the teachings of mere mortal men.
In those words it doesn't. But why follow the teachings of mere mortal men when we have the complete teachings of Christ right in front of us? If he wanted there to be more, he would have said so.clskinner said:I'm not looking to argue this with you, Lambslove. I'm looking for scriptures that show a Baptist's belief in sola scriptura. Where in the Sacred Texts does it say that the scriptures contain the entirety of God's revelation, per your statement above?
Sorry that I didn't get back to you, but a guy has to sleep sometime. Let me know if you still need to pursue this or if it's too late now...clskinner said:Something like that. I'm trying to work on a project for my class (due tomorrow, nonetheless), and it's rarely as simple as a verse or two (thankfully!).
I think she (and I) is wondering where in the Bible it supports those claims.In those words it doesn't. But why follow the teachings of mere mortal men when we have the complete teachings of Christ right in front of us? If he wanted there to be more, he would have said so.
We do not add anything to the Bible...What do you need to add to the Bible to make it good enough?
Oh no problem. I really appreciated hearing your thoughts last night. It is too late for the assignment, but I'd still like to pursue it if you wouldn't mind. It's something I'm interested in, and it may be useful in the future. Besides, it's something that so many of my Protestant brothers and sisters hold to; I'd just like to understand where y'all are coming from. I'll be in and out this morning, as I have class, but I'll definitely check back this afternoon. Thanks, BT.BT said:Sorry that I didn't get back to you, but a guy has to sleep sometime. Let me know if you still need to pursue this or if it's too late now...
No problem. I'll go back to the first reply I missed and start there then. Just remember that I already said the list that I gave wasn't comprehensive.. just the common ones.. and the thing from Matthew isn't one that I've heard before it's just something that occurred to me some time ago...clskinner said:Oh no problem. I really appreciated hearing your thoughts last night. It is too late for the assignment, but I'd still like to pursue it if you wouldn't mind. It's something I'm interested in, and it may be useful in the future. Besides, it's something that so many of my Protestant brothers and sisters hold to; I'd just like to understand where y'all are coming from. I'll be in and out this morning, as I have class, but I'll definitely check back this afternoon. Thanks, BT.
The separation of flesh and spirit (Christian from the world, etc) is different than how the Holy Spirit teaches. We believe that the revelation from God of Himself to Man is complete. That there is no more new revelation coming.clskinner said:Ok, that's where I thought it was going - separation of flesh & spirit. And so a Baptist would say that the only way in which the Holy Ghost can teach/speak (speak may be putting words into your mouth?) is through the Scriptures? This question actually speaks to the next verse as well - your "every word fthat proceeds from the mouth of God" example.
Yeah that's something that I came up with in my devotions. I devoted some study to it and have been mulling it around for awhile. I haven't dedicated the time to it that I will before I see if I'm on the right track or way off... It's one of those things that I usually don't talk about because I'm not 100% on it myself...Huh, this isn't something I've heard before. But it's very interesting to me. Ah, that's for another day!